Jump to content

  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi,  Here's my draft and please feel free to give me suggestion: ========== Dear Sir/Madam, TFL case number: **** I would like to thank TFL for providing me the opportunity to explain my behaviour. I realised the stupidity of what I have done and wish to seek a resolution to this matter. I have no valid excuse for this action and I am extremely sorry and deeply regret my action. I hope you will accept my sincere apologies. Nothing can justify my action. I am aware that TFL are only able to operate if everyone pays their fare correctly and I feel so guilty about attempting to breach public trust. This has caused me sleepness nights and raised my anxieties. I have history of anxiety. This has been a hard lesson learnt. I have never been in trouble with the law in the past and I ensure that I won’t be in the future. I am and will be using my oyster card (PAYG). I would like to humbly appeal to TFL to allow me to settle this matter out of court and avoid going to prosecution given the adverse consequences it can have on me and my family. I am very concerned that prosecution for the first time and I would like to make restitution for my action. Having a criminal offense on my record will have detrimental consequences on me. I have always been a law abiding person and have no previous offences.     I would really appreciate if I can be given the opportunity to pay for any unpaid fares plus any charges and/or administrative cost which have been incurred by TFL due to this incident. I am sincerely remorseful and ashamed of myself, and I fully appreciate the severity and stupidity of my transgressions. Again, I would like to offer my sincerest apologies. Yours Faithfully, My Name -----------------------------  
    • My wife dropped my daughter off at a kids party space on a trading estate and didn't think to look for signs as she parked outside the establishment. We got a £60 (reduced early payment) fine. Although now the signs are to be seen its a lot of money is this something we must now pay? Attached is the notice and the signs. Looks obvious now but when you are driving to a party warehouse on a trading estate and looking for the place itself its easy to miss this and especially when it seems logical to park there and walk in. My wife was there for 30 minutes. Thanks in advance Sam          A4.pdf
    • That's such a perverse judgment its almost unbelievable Looks like totally ignored everything and just gave judgement on something that's not compulsory as in name a driver or appeal did judge confuse having to name a driver in a motoring offence case like speeding with the civil?
    • The OH had letter from Resolvecall regarding a very old LTSB debt at the start of the month. Knowing it was SB, I sent off the SB letter to Intrum who owns the debt. They responded to the OH last week when I was away. They basically said speak to Resolvecall and the standard letter, we'll pop to your house malarkey.... Just ignore as Intrum own the debt and from the looks of it have ignored the SB letter? The OH gets twitchy with these things, thanks PM.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.


      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell / Fredrickson Issues - 02 Mobile

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4899 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then


Please click the "Report " link


at the bottom of one of the posts.


If you want to post a new story then


Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 



Recommended Posts

Hi Everyone,


Sorry about this but these people are really beginning to bug me so i thought id ask the advice of people who know much more about it than me.


A number of years ago i had a mobile contract with 02, however, like so many others i hit financial issues and was no longer able to afford it. It ended at about £310 i owed to them.


It was idiotic of me but i ignored it hoping it would go away.


I hadn't heard anything from it for a number of years - going on 4/5 i think it is then out of the blue i get letters from Lowell Financial chasing me for this, again idiotic but i ignored them again, then they pulled in a company called Fredrickson International who put the pressure on a bit more.


I told them i wanted proof of the debt, both in letter and over phone and they sent a piece of paper out to me that has no real identifying issues. Additionally this piece of paper has this info at the top 2 lines:


DATE Type Debit Credit Balance

22/10/2008 Write Off-manual £310.49 £0.00

16/11/2006 Physical Payment £310.49 £310.49


This dont look right on posted version... on the 16th post it stated £310 on debt, 22/10 it stated £310 credit and balance of 0


Now to me..that looks like my debt has been written off in 2008. Also like i mentioned this piece of paper has no real identifying features on it.


I am not disputing i owe this debt however i have not said that to these people.


I'm in no better position now than i was when this became an issue, anyone that can help me it would really be very appreciated, this has started to keep me up nights lately.


Thank you all in advance




Link to post
Share on other sites

Fredricksons and their sidekicks HFO, Bryan Carter and First Logistics are bottom feeders and are trying to get you to pay up more than you actually possibly owe. If I were you I would contact 02 and ask to speak to somebody senior and see if you can get the proper amount, I bet the £310 includes fees which take your contract up to a year and beyond.


Do not speak to Fredricksons on the phone as they are only intent on getting money from you by hook or crook (usually by crook) and they are unlikely to have actually paid more than about £30 for buying this alleged debt from O2.


Others will be along soon to help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you didn't pay anything towards this alleged debt from 2005 then it is STATUTE BARRED.


I would check on when you last made payment and if it is 6 years then they cannot enforce collection.


Report Fredricksons for buying a statute barred debt to the Office of Fair Trading, Trading Standards (via Consumer Direct, you can upload the document they sent as proof of their stupidity) and to the Ministry of Justice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i dont think its been 6 years yet, something like october 06 so not quite 4 years. However my memory is poor and this information is what Fredrickson sent on that piece of paper additionally at one point in this info it says a balance of £10.67 and i have no recollection whatsoever that i ever paid something that low.

Edited by johnrh
Link to post
Share on other sites

Phishing trip, lowlifes like to chase mobile phone debts as they believe they can't be argued or questioned, IMO I would send the the 'No debt acknowledged letter@ as what they have sent you is not even worthy of flushing down the toilet;



Don't worry about sending it recorded delivery, personally I would send it 2nd class (get proof of posting) and this will tell them exactly how much of a priority you deem this, see what they come back with, which will probably be nothing more than another piece of tissue paper which bears no relevance to you, which you can simply file under ignore, keep all correspondence mind, including their envelopes, and keep a diary of events, NEVER EVER talk to them over the phone EVER! Unless you are confident and can run circles round them.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!



Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks so much for your help guys, is there any issues going on at all with the site as im having a very hard time connecting to the link you posted Baz.


Again Baz and sillygirl thanks so much for rapid responses

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi again everyone, i was hoping that leaving this a few days would fix my ie issues but i still cant access the link provided even with logging in, can i trouble you guys once more and request a copy and paste into here for me to do the same? also in regards to the letter do i state the company as the original debtor or the people trying to chase me up?

Link to post
Share on other sites


There have been a few issues since the revamp of the site but these will be addresed


Are you after the link that Bazooka Boo posted?

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes silver, everytime i click it it takes me to the forum index and not what was intended, ive managed to find it int he library section yet i still cant get into the file itself, keeps saying sign up to read more or something along those lines

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the Prove it letter:


Dear Sir or Madam


You have contacted me/us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself/ourselves.


I/we would point out that I/we have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to (insert company name).


I am/we are familiar with the CPUTR 2008 and the Office of Fair Trading's Guidance on debt collectionlink3.gif, which states that it unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.


I/we would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. AND in not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.


I/we would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you can provide evidence as to my/our liability for the debt in question.


I/we await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed. Otherwise I will have no option but to make a complaint to Trading Standards and also inform the Office Of Fair Trading of your actions.


I/we look forward to your reply.


Yours faithfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

As people have said John, your first port of call should be to get Lowell to prove - in writing - that they are legally entitled to chase any alleged debt. It may take them a couple of weeks to respond, or maybe several months. Either way, you will be a little more sure of where you stand. Take the advice from Silverfox, Sillygirl, Bazooka and HS and send the letter. Sit tight and await the outcome. I would advise sending anything by recorded delivery and head your correspondence as such, but that's just my way of doing things.


When you have some more information, post again here and let us know what's happening. I'm sure everyone will do what they can to help.


Best of luck mate.





Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

hi again guys, im sorry to bump an old thread but ive just had a response from a solicitors in reference to this issue, i sent it as advised 2nd class by bazooka boo. I dont recall getting a reply from them, im worried that sending it 2nd class it never reached its destination.


Now i have a letter from a Bryan Carter Solicitors stating that i have 10 days to pay or they will refer it to courts, also the letter ends with This matter has now reached a critical stage and you may wish to obtain independant legal advise.


Whats my next step? The "proof" that was sent to me a while back was little more than numbers on a piece of paper that i could have produced myself in 10 minutes and had no identifying info whatsoever.


EDIT: sorry about renewing the thread but this is getting out of hand, i have no idea whetehr i have an issue or this is just another scare tactic


EDIT 2: Additionally, ive been reading the forums about this Bryan Carter, what is a CCA request and is it something i could send to him?

Edited by johnrh
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ha ha, I'm glad you sent it 2nd class, a man of my own heart good for you.

There is absolutely no reason at all to think it failed to reach it's destination, IT DID, trust me, they are clearly deluded and infuriating, as this is the method of postage they all use, if it isn't 2nd class it will be walk sort or tnt, I have only ever had one letter sent to me via 1st class and that is from the foolish credit solutions.

If you check the letters you have received from BC/Lowell it will invariably be 2nd class, but it still got to you didn't it!


All BC needs is a modified version of failure to send evidence, as this is a mobile phone contract they fall outside of the remit of the normal CCA regs, so you won't be able to send them a CCA request.

If you satnd up to BC and he knows that you won't simply adopt the position and hold onto your ankles he will drop this like a hot potato, he normaly works along side Fredrickson International, have they not sent you anything?


That is normally this excuse of a solicitors first letter anyway, to everyone that has the misfortune of dealing with the horrible little man.


You could send him the same letter, the 'No debt acknowleged' with a little extra couple of sentences, saying that on the dd/mm/yyyy you sent Lowlifes the same letter to which they failed to respond or provide any evidence that this alleged debt exists and is owed by yourself, which you do not acknowlege it is.

Please therefore provide strict proof that this alleged debt, is indeed owed by me, how it has accrued and to whom.

Failure to provide such evidence will be my absolute defence and I will defend this allegation robustly.

I look forward to your prompt reply.

Or words to that effect.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!



Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?

  • Create New...