Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good Evening, I've got a fairly simple question but I'll provide some context incase needed. I've pursued a company that has operations in england despite them having no official office anywhere. I've managed to find a site they operate from and the papers there have been defended so I know they operate there. They've filed a defence which is honestly the worst defence ever, and despite being required to provide their witness evidence, they have not and have completely ignored the courts and my request for copies of it. I'm therefore considering applying to strike out their defence on the grounds the defence was rubbish and that they haven't provided any evidence for the trial. However, it has a trial date set for end of june, and a civil application wouldn't get heard until a week before then, so hardly worth it. However, my local court is very good at dealing with paper applications (i.e ones that don't need hearings, and frankly I think they are literally like 1-2 days from when you submit it to when a Judge sees it. I'm wondering if I can apply to strikeout a defence without a hearing OR whether a hearing is required for a strikeout application.   Thanks
    • I have just opened another bank acc with lloyds (i have a few already) After doing some research they may have some relation to tsb or be apart of the same group will this cause me issue if my salary is paid into my lloyds account? Also, if the debts do go into default and nothing is paid then after 6 years it all goes away? As the DCAs cannot do anything? I do want to start paying in like 3/4 months or do you advise I leave it if it goes into default? again sorry for all the questions, i am just processing everything
    • one reply only  follow post 2 of letter of claim <<clickme link. dx
    • Sorry, I got confused  Yes, it states all three   Thanks, 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help Needed for Repossession!


podperson
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4985 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I am hoping someone on here might be able to offer some advice so please bear with the long post.

 

I have a mortgage with Birmingham Midshires for a property that I haven't lived in for a year now. We had to move in a hurry due to personal reasons (very long story!) and I was still trying to sell/rent out the property when we moved. Long story short it was broken into very shortly after we moved, quite a bit of damage caused that the insurance wouldn't cover and that I couldn't afford to get repaired. Have been trying to sell it for a year now and had no success, I have been unable to make the mortgage payments and the lender has been unhelpful to say the least (I have offered partial payments which they have refused, I wasn't allowed to go onto interest only, etc.).

 

They sent me a letter a few months ago saying that they were considering court action so I contacted them again and said that since I was struggling to sell it and couldn't afford the arrears I would give the property back to them and at least avoid the court costs. I assumed they would sell it at auction but they advised me that they put it with an estate agent and I would still be liable until it sold with them. Now I have been trying to sell through various estate agents for a year now so didn't see what they were going to do differently and didn't want to be stuck paying for it for another year.

 

I spoke to one of the online estate agents and he suggested entering an auction they do with a reserve price. I contacted Birmingham Midshires and asked if they would agree to this and if it didn't sell then I would go back to the voluntary surrender. They asked me to send them confirmation forms from the estate agent, which I have been trying to get hold of for the last week. Now I have a letter through today saying they are taking me to court for repossession on 6th October, at the court near where the property is, which is 200 miles away from my current address, and charging me court costs of £150.

 

I'm really annoyed with this as I had told them that they could have the property back without going to court so I wouldn't be stuck with costs on top of everything else and they seemed happy to let me put it for auction. I don't know if it's worth me trying to defend this as I don't want to keep the property but they have been so unreasonable and unhelpful throughout the process. Is there any chance of asking a court to make the lender sell it at auction so I don't get stuck with it while they try and sell through an estate agent? I really don't know what to do with it anymore!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I am no expert and this is only my opinion but I think it has to go to Court for the lender to get a repossession order.

 

You could try ringing the court and then putting your offer in writing explaining that you feel that you have exhausted every avenue in trying to sell it yourself.

 

Mortgage Lenders are only interested in the money and do not care of the heartache they cause.

 

Good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...