Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi there Manager for our soccer sixes team moved overseas mid season and we struggled for numbers so we told the ref about 5 weeks prior to seasons end that we would see out these games then be done and he told us he’d ’pass the message on to the relevant people’. Heard nothing, then 3 days prior to the new season beginning we were given our fixture for that weekend. Told the guy over text we had pulled out and the ref should’ve passed a message on but we were told sufficient notice wasn’t given and it needed to be in writing. I argued it’s not our fault the ref didn’t do as he said but we were countered by the T&Cs.    now being chased for what was £608 kindly reduced to £476 to pay off remainder of the season. Been sent a letter in the post from their accountancy team and told needs to be paid by Friday.   seen a lot of the other threads saying we can literally just ignore everything but im concerned about debt collections and credit score being harmed. Can anyone confirm if this all works/what we should do?   thanks
    • Hi,   I have given an official police witness statement for the prosecution in an upcoming criminal court case, and I am very anxious about what might happen.  Specifically regarding being cross-examined.  My statement is very short, and only a couple of paragraphs long, regarding a conversation I had with one of the victims.  I have tried to research online about what information about me the defence barrister might be able to find and use to discredit me.  I have by no means have a shady past but, I am concerned about what private information might be brought up, and as this is a case that will be in the national press as it is in the public interest.  The two preliminary hearings were reported in the papers.   I have tried to research  online what information the opposition can seek, but it is all very complicated.  I believe that they can legally access public records, but I'm not sure what information public records hold.  Can they access my medical records, educational history, HMRC, and Department for Work and Pensions? (I am a self employed sole trader).  I was arrested once, and this was unfortunately instigated by the victim in this case, so could well be of interest to them.  It resulted in no further action, however I have only discovered this week that that, in fact, this means I have a criminal record, and will be so until I am 100 (no chance)! This has really annoyed me to say the least, especially since I asked him afterwards why he rang the police and he said 'for a laugh'.  So I have started to look into applying for it to be deleted, but again, if anyone has any advice on this I would be appreciative. At the moment, my name isn't on the confirmed list to give evidence, but the detective I have been dealing with has said it is 'likely'. The names of the victims in this case will not be allowed to be reported, are witnesses fair game for the press? I really need no know how deep they can delve in to my life so I am prepared if my character gets assassinated in front of the nation. I really wish I'd never agreed to this.   Many thanks
    • A belated thanks dx. Yes I may take your advice regarding StepChange. I am finding that I am telling them (on behalf of my Son) the true balances outstanding? They never seem to check properly in which worries me. If I was to take on myself is there another way of dealing with various debts? I have already submitted other IRL complaints on his behalf. Today I have received a further response from Quidie T/A Fernovo confirming that they will waiver all interest paid.
    • Good evening  Case hearing this Friday 26/04. looking to have all my prep/papers ready.    just checking in to get update on my last post , ( the t&c’s attached). No name or address on them as per #49   thank you UCM  
    • Thanks a lot.  I did read every single post and though the process was fairly clear at a high level, I just wanted to be sure in the areas a posted. Call it first time nerves, going down this route.  Thanks again.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

MBNA PPI Query


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4027 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

the FOS time limit is 'from the letter which states this is their final response'

 

just to clarify.

 

dx

 

Thanks dx, it was nice they mentioned it at all. Personally, I would go the court route rather than the fos. Thanks for the clarification.

Santander PPI X 2 **WON** claims on behalf of son (Oct 2010/ Mar 2011)

Citicard O/H (PPI) - **WON** Compound Interest Dec 2011

Citicard O/H (Charges) Bailiffs sent in August 2012

Barclaycard - **WON** Compound Interest Oct 2011

Monument - account information being sought for OH

Citicard - self - N1 submitted August 2012

Barclaycard - self - **WON** damages for non disclosure/information now rec'd. Aug 2012

Barclaycard - relation - Failed SAR sent 29/09/11

Halifax SAR sent 18/08/2011 for relation

LTSB - SAR sent 09/08/2011 for friend

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 219
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

the FOS time limit is 'from the letter which states this is their final response'

 

just to clarify.

 

dx

 

So basically their investigation is on going and the FOS/6 Month thing is really a red herring then?

 

I will certainly be going the court route in the end as the FOS are currently dealing with an insurance issue for me and it's taking for ever :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK.

 

Ignore the last post things have progressed as of today ;)

 

I received a cheque :)

 

Now I need to ask a question...again :)

 

The accompanying letter is vague and makes references to recent correspondence and encloses "the cheque for the sum of £xxxx as promised"

 

If you scan back through the thread, nothing has been promised anywhere apart from looking into my complaint!! There is no mention in or attached to the cheque or letter that gives a breakdown of the payment offered and nor is it even remotely close to the amount requested. I would say it is possibly a third of the total amount I probably paid in PPI over the time of the card and certainly contains no interest or apologies at all :(

 

So what would be your next step? I'm well pleased that I have a cheque as it is at least some sort of admission of the PPI being mis-sold but it falls far short of what I would expect to receive!

 

I'd like to bank the cheque for obvious reasons but in doing so will that be considered accepting full and final or can I bank it and ssend a letter say I'm accepting it as an interim payment or part payment and argue onwards?

 

Thanks in advance :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

how much in % is this compared with what you 'should' be getting?

 

pers i'd send them a quick example of the way to calculated things from say the FOS website, there are plenty of example calsc at the end of their 'case' pdf's.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Smoothound,

 

See post 121 above, unfortunately had to have a couple of operations since that was posted so have not got around to starting court proceedings yet, but my situation is the same as yours. Initially went the FOS route but all I got was some dozy bug(person)ger on the other end of the 'phone saying, 'well MBNA believe they have refunded you the PPI plus interest' for over a year. This was in spite of my copying all the statements and providing a speradsheet to show they could not have.

 

Court is the only route left I feel. As dx said, get the calcs from the FOS site and use those to calculate what you should be getting. Doubt if the court would argue against what the FOS say should be used.

 

Bets of luck.

 

Bosun.

Please note: I have no formal qualifications in this area and any advice offered is given in good faith. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they had included calculations, etc, it would not have matched up with what they sent you. So they don't. Simples...

Please note: I have no formal qualifications in this area and any advice offered is given in good faith. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm!! So basically I should now send a letter saying I disagree with their amount and require figures/breakdown giving them say 14 days to respond and then go to court or FOS?

 

In the meantime what should I do with the cheque? Do I bank it accepting it as part payment in the above letter or just sit on it for the time being? I'm worried that if I bank it it may be considered me accepting that as the final amount?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

My situation was slightly different in that I still had an outstanding balance so they they just reduced it but, if I were in your shoes I would get a letter thanking them for the 'part payment' but pointing out that you do not believe that they have refunded all of the refund to which you are entitled and bank the cheque.

 

In your letter, give them a period of time in which you expect to receive a response, 28 days is not unreasonable, before you take the matter further. Hopefully, you will receive a 'Final Response'. If you do or not does not matter, you have given them a chance to rectify the situation that you can provide as proof of your, not unreasonable, attempt to resolve the situation.

 

I have had a situation in the past where I've received a payment for work done but had been under paid. When I pointed this out the company disagreed, we ended up in court and the court decided in my favour. The point of this is that when I received the original payment, I banked the cheque, then started the process of recovering the outstanding balance. In court, the fact that I had banked any money at all from the company was never mentioned.

 

 

Bosun.

Edited by Bosund

Please note: I have no formal qualifications in this area and any advice offered is given in good faith. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Bosun.

 

Pretty much what I am inclined to do. I was just worried that in banking the cheque I'm accepting it as final payment but reading your reply this appears not the case :)

 

My situation is similar to yours as there was a balance on the card which is now owned by a DCA but there was UR so technically the debt is reduced to under £2000.

 

My main problem with all of this is that I have no idea of the figures they have worked to as I had few when I put in my claim and they never supplied any more when asked. I had to use guesstimated figures for over 50% of the time span because of this. It's possible they may have sent some money to the DCA to cover the outstanding amount but I was sure they weren't allowed to do this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think I would write back to acknowledge receipt of their cheque for xxxxx however, request that they give you a detailed breakdown of how the figure was calculated, in view of the fact that you consider it to be far short of your calculations of xxxx.

 

Give them so many days to respond, after which time you will bank the cheque and accept it as PARTIAL payment towards the total claim of xxxx

 

It's strange that they have sent payment to you when there is a balance on the account, it is usually just credited, you may be right thinking that money has gone elsewhere but I doubt that it has gone to a DCA!

 

Also ask for copies of the previous correspondence they refer to.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Smoothound,

 

Is it possible that the they have reduced the outstanding balance on your account to zero and forwarded to you what was left over?

 

Have a look at what you estimated what was due, remove what the balance remaining on your account then add what you received.

 

Some estimates are a bit high, ppi + interest + compond + simple, so be realistic.

 

Regards...

Please note: I have no formal qualifications in this area and any advice offered is given in good faith. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's possible I guess my claim was for a substantial amount for sure with all the interest and the estimated figures etc.

 

I will check my figures and see what I can find out. Still feel there should be a note in there showing where money has gone if it has!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just roughed up a quick letter. I'm rubbish at this sort of thing so if you could pick holes in it for me please it would be great :)

 

 

I have received a cheque enclosed with your last letter regarding my PPI Mis Sale Complaint. I am accepting it only as part payment for the claim as it is a totally different and far smaller figure than the one contained within my claim.

 

Please could you note and answer the following points:-

 

1/ I have had no letter telling me this cheque was being sent and your letter infers you had promised me this amount in a previous letter. I would like a copy of this letter for my records.

 

2/ If you feel this figure is actually correct could I please have a breakdown of how it has been calculated as nothing at all was enclosed with the cheque?

 

3/ Obviously I strongly disagree with the amount you have refunded and will take the matter further if I am not satisfied fully with either the Financial Ombudsman Service or County Court.

 

I will expect a response on this matter within 28 days of the date of this letter or I will take it further.

 

 

 

 

Yours faithfully,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Revised letter ;)

 

 

I have received a cheque enclosed with your last letter regarding my PPI Mis Sale Complaint. I am accepting it only as part payment for the claim as it is a totally different and far smaller figure than the one contained within my claim.

 

Please could you note and answer the following points:-

 

1/ I have had no letter telling me this cheque was being sent and your letter infers you had promised me this amount in a previous letter. I would like a copy of this letter for my records.

 

2/ If you feel this figure is actually correct could I please have a breakdown of how it has been calculated as nothing at all was enclosed with the cheque?

 

3/ Obviously I strongly disagree with the amount you have refunded and will take the matter further if I am not satisfied fully.

 

I will expect a response on this matter within 14 days of the date of this letter or I will take it further.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Still nothing from MBNA. Expurto still hassling via their "solicitors" letters.

 

Spoke to the FOS and they were surprised that MBNA had just sent a random cheque with no explanation or breakdown. Advised me to phone them or write again chasing!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Still nothing from MBNA. Expurto still hassling via their "solicitors" letters.

 

Spoke to the FOS and they were surprised that MBNA had just sent a random cheque with no explanation or breakdown. Advised me to phone them or write again chasing!!

 

I guess you spoke to fos on the phone?

 

If it were me I would call MBNA and see if you can get the breakdown BUT follow up with a letter as well (7 days only) and tell them that you will be escalating the matter if they don't respond. If you can record the call great.

 

If you get the breakdown at least you've moved forward. If you don't get the breakdown then after the 7 days put in a formal complaint to fos.

 

ims

Edited by ims21

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...