Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Wait for more replies, but that letter to me can be interpreted as a letter before action. Ignoring it can have consequences. The court to impose sanctions for failure in responding to a letter of claim.
    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Several problems with welcome finance - please help!


handsomeharris
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4900 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

I am currently looking into reclaiming PPI charges for my girlfriend on her welcome finance unsecured loan.

 

I've also noticed a separate issue in that she had a salesperson who she knew personally "help her out" by offering reduced payments after she lost her job.

 

It looks like what this person did was in fact give a new loan, as the original was for £2500, however her most recent statement says Amount of credit provided: £4039.79, and this statement begins with opening balance £0 then initial disbursement £3964.79. This statement says it is over 72 months when the original was over 24 months.

 

Just wondering what the best way to find out what's going on here would be, as she was totally unaware this was what this salesperson who incidentally she knew before and thought was a friend was doing.

 

Do we need to do a Subject Access Request and get the Credit Agreements for this, and find out whats happened here?

 

Also, will this affect the PPI claim we are persuing?

 

Thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello..

 

Have you not questioned this salesperson who your girlfriend "knew" about this matter ? That's the first thing i'll do..

 

Getting a sar and cca may take a while as these idiots don't like to play ball so you may be in for a long wait. Even if they do send it on time the chances are it won't be correct.

It's a good idea to scour these posts for information regarding your grievence as they are a good source of info, although each case may be different to yours, you will still gain some knowlege that may help you in your case..

 

If your persuing your claim for ppi, how do you know what to claim for if you've not got your cca etc. just that i'm in same boat waiting for details that haven't arrived because i believe i've been misold ppi..

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply

 

Yeah I can't remember why she hasnt got in touch with them about it, I think we are just realising how bad it was...

 

Well she doesnt have many statements, but knows the PPI is rubbish because it didnt pay out when she did loose her job, and she didnt have sick pay either. We started filling in the PPI questionaire from the FOS just to try and reclaim the PPI without having all the details and just hoping for the best. (but will we need more info than just the account number and the argument that it was mis-sold?)

 

But having read the site, I can see that its likely we can do something about the conman salesperson too, just wondered what the next step would be with that?

 

and also if its best to do it separately from the PPI questionairre which we might not need to wait for the SAR stuff to come through for.(which I understand would be a long time)

 

I'm going to send off the SAR and take it from there anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

sar is 40 calendar days from when they get it

 

your GF has been fleeced big time here.

 

she has had a new agreement made out [which is a very nice little money making exercise that welcome often pull]

 

she would have had no PPI nor interest rebate when the first loan was refinanced, so shes got PPI on PPI and PPI interest on PPI interest.

 

she is in for a windfall and poss alot more [like no signed second agreement?]

 

it could wipe it all out.

 

do some reading here , you'll soon get the idea

 

look for posts by postggj - tip.

 

when you have the agreements i'd ping dj1971, he's very good at this type of game.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the help, I've been doing a lot of reading of postgjjs stuff on here. I'll get the SAR sent. Ive read that welcome are quite slow at responding to these though and when they do its not that complete! Just got to be patient :)

 

EDIT: Just wanted some advice as what do you think is best, send off the questionairre to welcome for reclaiming PPI now and worry about the rest (payments on payments etc) later, or do it all at once when I have the SAR back? I'm thinking send off the questionairre as it will be simpler and quicker to reclaim the PPI then go for the rest if it becomes apparent they have conned us.

Edited by handsomeharris
Link to post
Share on other sites

welcome seem to be responding to sar quite quickly at the moment but not sending a complete one so be prepared to receive the bare bones and then sending a reminder letter for the rest ;)

 

If you dont have all the info id not bother sending back the questionnaire half completed as that is just another reason for them to stall, id personally wait until i had all the bullets and then shoot them :)

I am a consumer just like you, please get a second opinion or investigate yourself on anything I advise as I am in no way legally trained. Everything I know has come from the Mighty CAG and fellow CAGGERS. :cool:

 

If I have helped in any way please click my reputation star and make a donation to CAG to enable us all to continue to help each other :cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Make sure you get BOTH agreements...If there is a fault on the first one they may fob you off....If there are other insurances on the first but not the second then other factors come into play ie:- hidden charges or the second not including the original t&c's etc which it must.....

As dx100uk said get as much advice as you can...good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

as above, if you ask for them in the letter, then yes they should come.

if you don't, sometimes they are cleaver and dont send them because they know why you want them!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Make sure you get BOTH agreements...If there is a fault on the first one they may fob you off....If there are other insurances on the first but not the second then other factors come into play ie:- hidden charges or the second not including the original t&c's etc which it must.....

As dx100uk said get as much advice as you can...good luck

 

Just looked through everything and there is only the info for the second loan as you mention. There is zero under amount for insurance, zero for cash advance, only the £3964 as credit to settle the loan (refering to the first loan I guess?)

 

So is the best/faster bet to try and ring the person on the letter we got, and say we wanted everything or just send them a letter to get the info about the first loan. (and is there a suitable template knocking about at all?)

 

I know I put a certain account and customer number on the SAR letter but I thought that it would include all the accounts not just that one (if they were indeed different numbers for the two loans) .

 

Don't have access to a scanner but I will get the agreement up once we do.

 

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

When this new loan was done

 

was a new agreement signed

 

welcome had a habit of ignoring that point

 

well as we can gather from the above post, the second one is signed but the first one, and the details of the insurance on it etc are nowhere to been seen in this SAR

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just looked through everything and there is only the info for the second loan as you mention. There is zero under amount for insurance, zero for cash advance, only the £3964 as credit to settle the loan (refering to the first loan I guess?)

 

So is the best bet to try and ring the person on the letter we got, and say we wanted everything or just send them a letter to get the info about the first loan. I know I put a certain account and customer number on the SAR letter but I thought that it would include all the accounts not just that one (if they were indeed different).

 

Don't have access to a scanner but I will get the agreement up once we do.

 

Cheers

 

dont ring them keep everything to writing so you have a paper trial

I am a consumer just like you, please get a second opinion or investigate yourself on anything I advise as I am in no way legally trained. Everything I know has come from the Mighty CAG and fellow CAGGERS. :cool:

 

If I have helped in any way please click my reputation star and make a donation to CAG to enable us all to continue to help each other :cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

dont foget you can use a mobile phone or a digital camera too!

 

as for the sar

pers i'd write back [don't ever phone or talk to them face-2-face or on the phone] with the failure to comply letter [see the library tab top left of your thread]

stating they have NOT included everything they have on you, esp the first A/C and that the 40 days clock [from the date they got your 1st letter] is still ticking

 

typical underhand action!!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What they have done is re-written the loan. Welcome no longer do this as they have realised it gets people into an even bigger mess than they were in before.

 

They no doubt will hyave told your girlfriend that they can reduce her payments for her, possibly not being forthcoming about how they can do this. Usually they set up a new loan and increase the term (naturally making the payment lower) many people do not seem to know that the loan is going to be extended which sounds like exactly what they've done to your girlfriend. This was no doubt done in a branch that has been closed down.

 

When you write to welcome finance tell them that she was unaware of what has happened and (I assume) took advantage of her situation. Their biggest defence is "you agreed to is" but if someone is in a vulnerable state and they are told that they can be helped of course they are going to listen.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Something else to think about while we are waiting for the 1st loan documents. The agreement was signed in her house, as the person came round to get it signed however the CCA says that by signing it you declare that it was signed in the office. Does this affect anything in terms of cancellation rights or anything? Unfortunately I dont think we can really prove that it wasnt signed in the office anyway, just wondering.

Link to post
Share on other sites

just another fleecing tactic sadly

 

if it ever needed to be questioned i'm sure it would never be argued about.

you signed outside the store..fullstop.

 

dont worry about it

this only comes into effect if you wanted to cancel anyhow.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

is what 20days?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
sorry if it wasnt clear :) the time that they have left after the intial SAR request before I complain to the ICO.

 

All I want is details of insurance premiums on the first loan, which she definetely paid so we can reclaim them.

 

If its for an SAR they have 40 days to comply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

prob still awaiting the sar reply?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...