Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 20 million quid on just the brokering fee for a crappy deal with the UK public hocked to pay more for PPE - which was probably useless with better and cheaper per item with no 20 million quid fee - available from alibaba Stinks of corruption to me.  
    • Breaking News Biden wins Kennedy family endorsement Fifteen members of the storied Kennedy political family endorsed U.S. President Joe Biden at a Philadelphia campaign event on Thursday, with some joining him onstage, in a rebuke of Robert F. Kennedy Jr's independent bid for the White House. and 30 members in the extended Kennedy family   nytimes.com WWW.NYTIMES.COM Kennedys endorse Biden over their relative RFK Jr WWW.BBC.CO.UK Robert F Kennedy Jr is running for president as an independent - but many family members oppose him. More than a dozen Kennedy family members endorse Biden, snub RFK Jr. | CBC News WWW.CBC.CA President Joe Biden accepted endorsements from at least 15 members of the Kennedy political family during a campaign stop...  
    • Speaking of Frost and Johnson the corrupt liars' grate deal they forced through   Shortages of life saving medicines has become ‘new normal’ for UK after Brexit WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK ‘The medicines supply chain is broken at every level,’ warns Dr Leyla Hannbeck   "Professor Tamara Hervey, of the City Law School, said: “There is nothing inevitable about this ‘new normal’ where Great Britain is isolated in efforts to manage fragilities in global supply of the products and people we need to run the NHS. It is the consequence of policy choices and those could be different.”     Mind you, the private sector is making hays while the NHS is burned. Private health insurance market grows by £385m in a year amid NHS crisis | Private healthcare | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Demand for private treatment booms as NHS waiting lists remain long, while more people also sign up for dental cover  
    • That's an idea on Maquarie. On being accountable, you also have to blame Ofwat and possibly the Environment Agency although they've been badly defunded. I put the Frost article up for balance.  
    • I agree HB, but there were no laws broken - its perfectly legal to fleece the UK and its infrastructure - and labour were little better than the Tories Perhaps an option would be to ban the aussie investment fund from the UKs markets
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

welcome nightmare


tamthetaper
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4457 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

DX waves to the guests

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 167
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

once i,ve signed the acceptance form they will pay off the loan then i,m welcome free

 

i,m stiill trying to get the signed agreement for the account

i have posted many times before,

i know this could be challenged i think i can still do this as it does not involve the ppi claim .

 

.as for ppi 1999-2003 in 2003 i was made unemployed

phoned welcome to ask if i could use the insurance on the account

i received a letter from them which i still have saying that it could not be used it didnt fit my needs(there words)

so i still had to pay it anyway .

 

in 2005 i became self-employed so i know that i didnt need it do think this would be enough to get them to reconsider my complained

Link to post
Share on other sites

they are not the one to decide if you get it or not.

 

pers i'd give them 8 weeks from you first letter then if you get no joy

 

off to the FOS

 

it would also be nice to be able to check welcomes calcs.....

 

did they give you 8% stat too on what they've already refunded?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

rollocks

 

ppi was sold to you by welcome. you paid welcome

 

you get it back from welcome

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

they are paying out on the loans from 2004 onwards

that is 4 loans £7183.83

they say to clear the outstanding loan im due them £7151.74

 

phoned them today to ask for balance

they have i was told £6557.77

when i asked how i had to pay more he said its what the computer came up with .

 

then asked about arrears rising by £500 and interest was added

he got quite abrupt i will sign it just to get shot of them ..

. i want to get the default off my house .

 

once thats done im going for disputing the account thats getting payed off

the fact it was signed in the house ,

wrong figures,

ad hoc default fees and anything else i can get out off them

before they fold regarting 1999-2003 do you think i still have a case

Link to post
Share on other sites

i know on paper it looks a good offer

but for the last couple o hours,days,, weeks,

sat and looked at other quires on the welcome forum

 

dx you,ve always gave good advice

what would happen if i refuse this offer

many things dont add up

i want to get rid of welcome

but dont want them getting more than they deserve

 

there,s so many wrongs but i would like to be sure before i sign the acceptation form

as always thanks tam

 

if i signed the form to accept the ppi refund which i think is ok

can i dispute the account and the figures that come with it

as posted many times before the balance im due them seems wrong again cheers tam

Edited by tamthetaper
Link to post
Share on other sites

we need to attract postggj or dj1971 to check welcomes cals.

 

then go from there

 

as for you only getting £32 to your pocket...what are the figures on any DN's in arrears theyhave sent you

 

they CANNOT just take the money as they feel fit to clear any outstanding balance, even on the one thats been to court.

 

pers i would NOT accept the offer at this stage, if that is what they are going to do

 

ok if YOU want to do that, its another matter, but i certainly WOUNLD NOT accept the payment before we get it checked.

 

now the one that went to court...

 

its got lots wrong with it, but court any the legal arguements are not my game

 

however, on your other thread, postggj intimates there are serious issues there, post is never wrong.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

welcomeletter15jan11no.jpg

 

received this today

more confusion

the original loan they say is the one that i have now been taken to court for.

. the one that they say was rewritten is the one that was payed for in 2008

still dont have the rewriitten aggrement that i signed in may 2008 for the loan that i am paying now

they also say i am exempt from paying intrerest and charges which i have paperwork in statements to prove i have been paying interest

as posted before would love post ggj to take a look tam

Link to post
Share on other sites

gday all

 

been asked to drop in

 

as asked, has the decree ben settled

 

its time to go to war

 

the ppi refund o the four accounts, did you accept it as a full and final or did welcome just credit it to your account

 

what inteest was used to credit the rebate, 8 % compound or contractual (the apr on the agreements)

do you have all your agreements, that includes pre 2003, any old statements

Link to post
Share on other sites

post 106 + post 31

 

has not accepted the refund

 

the Q here is really abou the current loan which has got the decree but no paperwork

[the one just signed by them in their house - details were filled in afterwards - that CCA does not exist but they got a decree!!]

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

the decree has not been settled

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ime away on my employment law course this week but ill have use of the college computers in the evening and we have a few people comming down from scotland as this is not a ccj but a decree.

 

Ime brushing up on scottish law proceedure but it seems we need to get this set aside first (unsure on time limits) at the moment

 

IS THIS LOAN A SECURED LOAN???

Link to post
Share on other sites

i dont think it is

 

can you poss check the refund sheet they have sent for the PPI on some of the previous loans is correct?

 

up a few posts.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

page 106 post!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

WELCOMES OLD TRICKS AGAIN

 

FIGURES ON THE REBATE ARE WELL OUT

 

8% , THEY CAN SOD OFF, MORE LIKE CONTRACTUAL INTEREST, (FOR EACH ONE OF THESE LOANS DO YOU HAVE A DOCUMENT CALLED STATEMENT OF PRICE)

 

I NEED TO SEE STATEMENTS FOR EACH ONE OF THESE LOANS (OPENING AND CLOSING BALANCE)

 

DO YOU HAVE ANY POLICY DOCS ON THE INSURANCE (DONT START ME ON NORWICH DX :smile:)

 

AS STATED, THE FIRST THING IS GETTING THIS SET ASIDE AND GETTING THIS HEFTY WINDFALL PAID BACK

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...