Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Problem with Landlord re: Gas certificate etc


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4982 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I stood as guarantor for my Grandaugher and her partner in October 2009,no problem there,both working,rent paid.

 

When they moved into the property there were some repairs that needed doing to the property and the Landlord agreed to do them when the previous tenant's deposit was released to him but to date they have still not been done.

 

I became involved a few weeks ago when I was told that since they had taken over the property they had been having constant problems with the hot water not working but more seriously they could not use the gas cooker as the light kept cutting out leaving gas escaping.Apparently this had been the case since they took over the tenancy.

 

I was also shocked to learn that the Landlord had turned up without warning and attempted to enter the property by using a front door key.

 

When the property was originally let, all of the arrangements were made by a Letting Agency but I have been informed that the Landlord took over the management of the property shortly after and,according to my Grandaughter they are extremely difficult to contact so I began writing letters!

 

I wrote to the Landlord referring him to various clauses in the Tenancy Agreement including the section stating that he cannot simply turn up on her doorstep but is required to give the statutory 24 hours notice and I asked him to produce a copy of the Gas Certificate check as I am rather dubious that the necessary checks had been made when the tenancy began.

 

He has replied saying that the Gas Certificate was handed to my Grandaughter by the original agents but I was present at the time and I know that this is not the case as I took all of the relevant paperwork for safe keeping.

 

My Grandaughter received a letter from the Landlord yesterday stating that he would be visiting the property tomorrow (26th) and I intend to be there to see just what is going on, so, after a long ramble,my question is this - If he cannot produce a copy of this Certificate what are my options?

 

As a guarantor I don't want to do or say anything that isn't right and proper but I do feel that there is something not right here.

 

Any advise with how to proceed would be much appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If he cannot produce a copy of the certificate, then contact local tenancy enforcement and/or environmental health (it will differ between local authorities) immediately.

 

It is possible that this is a simple error on the part of the landlord - i.e. they thought it was handed over but it actually wasnt. But in any event, the LANDLORD will have a copy, so he should be able to produce this.

 

Although it seems strange that it may have passed a safety check with the gas cooker the way it is, obviously as it sounds like the fault is intermittent this is quite possibly the case.

 

I think you need to be polite but firm, and stress that these repairs are rectified post haste - especially areas that cause issues with basic living, such as hot water and cooking issues.

 

If he cannot produce a safety cert, ask him to have one provided to you within 48 hours. Otherwise, contact EH etc. That is clearly (as you obviously understand from your post) the most important issue.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Obviously, also bear in mind that your position as guarantor has no bearing on the tenancy itself, and as such the only person who can enforce the landlord obligations is the tenant themself. Again, I feel like this is stating the obvious, but you yourself cannot demand or request anything - or at least, the landlord is quite entitled to turn around and say go away, you arent the tenant.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much for your quick response,I'll let you know what happens when I've met him - should be interesting!

 

I realise that it is the tenant who will be the one making the request but I need to guide her in the right direction when the Landlord turns up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are welcome, and best of luck.

 

All I would say (from a non-legal perspective) is dont go in there with a preassumed impression of the landlord. Although they dont sound like the best landlord, initially at least, polite informal conversation may result in the best outcome. Bad landlords are not neccessarily unreasonable people, quite often simply ignorant of their obligations and the impact certain shortcomings have on their tenants.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I must admit that I am quite annoyed about the situation but think the problems have been caused by ignorance of the law rather than anything else.

The Landlord and his wife used to live in the property; have moved to another part of the country for two years and do intend to return.They probably thought that it was an easy option to rent rather than sell not realising that along with merely collecting rent came quite a heavy responsibility but instead of allowing the Letting Agency deal with the day to day management( for which I assume there would be a fee) they thought they would save more by taking on the management themselves.

 

The only knowledge I have of rental property is that I have rented (quite happily) for many years and am therefore aware of the responsibilty a Landlord has.

 

Hopefully I will be able to help resolve this amicably and will go into our meeting with an open mind.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think annoyance of the situation is fair and right - and I think it would in some ways be absolutely acceptable to go in there all guns blazing, they would certainly deserve it.

 

But, the issue is, that all this will probably serve is to get their back up, and heels will be dug in. Ultimately, all you want are the issues resolved.

 

Unfortunately, there are a growing (or maybe shrinking since the recession!) number of landlords like this, who see it as an easy option without checking all of their obligations. Especially with this type of landlord, although annoyed is correct, they may well be very reasonable people who are in over their heads.

 

Clearly, having been made aware of the issues, and then if they fail to resolve, then they deserve the full force of enforcement to be unleashed upon them. Not providing a gas safety cert is such a basic error that it does concern me, and should be a taboo of a level of drink driving in my humble opinion. That said, as mentioned above,it may be a simple mistake :)

 

Right, soapbox descended from! Please do come back tomorrow and let us know how you get on.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Out of interest, was the deposit (presuming there was one) protected in a tenancy deposit scheme?

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I saw the Landlord yesterday and asked if I could see a copy of the current Gas Certificate but he had mislaid it although he did admit that it had run out in July and he said that he would arrange for an engineer to call the following day to complete a new check.He phoned while I was there and all seemed good,I could expect the engineer at 11.00am this morning.

Unfortunately I was at work but my Son in Law was present when he arrived and he was not impressed

 

Could someone confirm or otherwise that this is what a registered gas engineer should produce when making an annual safety check :

http://www.gassaferegister.co.uk/images/id%20card%20large%202010.jpg

 

The reason I ask follows a visit from this so called engineer to carry out such a check - I haven't yet seen the certificate that was left at the property but I have been told that the ID that he produced did not look like the one above,there was no picture and the blue Gas safe logo was not there.

 

The engineer only looked at the cooker and said that he believed it may be a faulty valve that was causing it to cut out and left it at that. He did no check on the gas boiler which I find rather strange.

 

The engineer came with the landlord and they chatted away about family so were obviously good friends,do they really think I'm that stupid?

Link to post
Share on other sites

He did no check on the boiler?

 

OK landlord needs to get that redone - simple as.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

What information does the Landlords Gas Safety record contain?

 

 

 

As a minimum, the record of a gas safety check must contain:

  • description and location of each appliance and/or flue checked
  • name, registration number and signature of the engineer who carried out the check
  • date on which the appliance and/or flue was checked
  • the address of the property at which the appliance and/or flue is installed
  • the name and address of the landlord (or his agent where appropriate)
  • any defect identified and any action required or taken to fix it
  • confirmation of the results of operational safety checks carried out on the appliances.

These checks include;

 

  • checking the flue or chimney to make sure the products of combustion (fumes) are being safely removed to outside.
  • checking there is an adequate supply of fresh air so the gas burns properly.
  • checking the appliance is burning the gas properly.
  • checking all safety devices are working properly and shutting the appliance off if a fault occurs.

Clearly, the appliance (gas cooker) was not shut off.

 

Moreover, you cannot check the appliance is burning the gas properly by a simple visual inspection (to my knowledge) - it is all to do with the cleanness of the burn etc.

 

The bloke sounds like a cowboy, and as you say a "mate" of the landlord.

 

Post up a copy of the cert (scrubbed of details) when you get it.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...