Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
    • Thanks for opening, it's been another rough year for my family and I've procastinated a little.. Due to the age of my defaults on this and other accounts (circa 2021), I really need to avoid a CCJ as that will be another 6 years of credit issues. Mediation failed as I played the 'not enough info to make a decision' however during the call for some reason they did offer settlement at 80%, I refused. this has been allocated to small claims track, court date is June 3 and I've received their WS. I'm starting on my WS. They do appear to have provided everything required of them (even if docs could be reconstructions). Not really sure what my argument is anymore but I do want to attend court and see this through. Should a judgement be made against me then I will clear the balance within 30 days and have the CCJ removed - this is still possible isn't it? I'm going to be reading up today and tomorrow and hope you can provide me some guidance in the meantime. Wonder what your advice would be given the documents they have provided? I am now in a position to clear the debt either by lump sum or a few large installments - Is this something i should look into at this late stage? Thanks as always in advance
    • I have now received my SAR. It includes a great deal of information! Is there a time limit on how long account information is kept and/or can be provided to debtors? I have received many account statements which were not previously sent to me. I remember that the creditor should provide explanations of any acronyms and abbreviations that maybe used in the documents. Is this still the case? Also what, if any, are the regulations in regard to adding fees to a debt? Can fees be added to a debt after the court has approved a charge on a property. Perhaps due to the numerous owners of the debt, many payments I made were not properly recorded on the account, some were entered over a year after the payment was made! Following the Legal Charge, I paid every month until my payments were refused. I am trying to compute the over payments, but the addition of fees etc. is confusing me. Any comments and/or help would be appreciated.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Disciplinary hearing


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4995 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi new here!

 

Would appreciate some advice please. My husband was told there was to be an investigation into several areas which his manager had raised about his work and management of his team and his attitude to the manager.

 

The 15 questions were asked by another manager with someone taking notes and he asked a colleague to be present. He had no knowledge of what he had done wrong prior to the investigation. He answered the questions to the best of his ability some of the issues dating back to the beginning of the year which he thought were long sorted out. He has now recieved a letter with a copy of the transcript of just 6 of the situations and a date for a disciplinary hearing giving him only 3 working days to prepare. He is starting to panic so should he just be concentrating on answering again the 6 situations and getting written back up from other staff or raise a grievance against his manager for his handling of the situation?

 

Can he take typed notes into the hearing to suppport his answers? He is not a member of a union.

 

Any suggestions please? many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure he's got reason to raise a grievance.

He should concentrate on challenging the allegations put forward to be considered at the disciplinary. Make sure that if any other issues are brought up that he challenges the fact that they weren't stated beforehand.

Yes, he can get written back up from other staff, just be sure that he doesn't do anything that could be seen as pressuring them to support him. It's funny how in these situations everybody else suddenly doesn't want to be involved ;-(

If they've stated explicitly in their invitation to disciplinary what the allegation are, it's a good idea to prepare a written statement in response, then simply present that to them and say as little as possible. Try and avoid letting them turn the disciplinary into a cross-examination.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would write to the employer stating that 3 working days to prepare for something that he has not even been informed was a problem. he should ask for X days to enable him to prepare a defence to these allegations. I would rase the fact that the initial investigation (and the unfairness of it... specify) and the letter he received made no mention of the 9 other matters and as a transcript was made of the entire proceedings could he have the other missing pages or if they do not exist how can he be certain that the disclosed transcript has not been edited unfairly. Place as much doubt on it as is possible.

 

For the next stage I would suggest that he is armed with a digital recorder and record all the conversation. Later he should make a transcript of the recording as he can use this in any ET proceedings and as it will be verbatim it will be trusted as a true record. It seems to me from what you have said already that they are out to get him. The employer normally has some sort of outcome in mind from the outset and will not be swayed. Your husband needs to place as many obstacles in their way so he has a fighting chance later.

 

Have you legal expenses cover? Normally in the home contents insurance. If not maybe worth getting covered asap, although there may be a lead in period before being able to claim. They normally cover employment problems.

 

Are these time limits as per company policies?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just another thing, you say that some of the issues date back to the beginning of the year, have management been aware of these issues, yet have only now decided to take action?

If so, he could well have the argument that they're 'timed out', that if management were aware yet took no action, it's too late to now bring him to task.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou for you advice papasmurf1 you have given us something to think about. As far as we can work out there are no time limits given in hubbies contract. For the investigation he was given a letter by his manager on the Monday and told he had to meet another manager on the Thursady to answer some questions. 8 days later and he has received the letter for the hearing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK here goes,

I am the OH referred to by crissyb123,

The grievance referred to is that since this manager arrived I feel I have been able to do nothing right for doing wrong, to an extent that I feel I have been bullied and harassed at every twist and turn, many instances are/were trivial in essence but over a time grind you down, there have been so many that I can only remember a couple of major incidents, I will only relate one to save boring everyone,

A couple of months ago one of my team finished his shift, changed out of uniform and upped and left, telling a colleague, he would not be back and left the uniform and a letter addressed to me with it, I was phoned on my day off by the manager and after about 15 minutes of going around the houses and idle chat, asked me if I knew that this person had left, I explained that as the shift had finished 2 hours ago he should have by now, I was then put in the picture and asked about 10 times if I had any prior knowledge it would occur, which I continually denied, I was then told in no uncertain tones that I should collect the letter and take it to my manager forthwith.

 

This person does not ask questions , but “demands explanations”

 

Thought I would throw this in as an after thought will be interested in replies

 

One of the allegations against me is that on one occasion I was asked/told that a certain task required completing by me, only an hour before I was due to finish work, (this was the first time I was made aware of the task). for three and a half hours I attempted to log on to the only computer that I could use to complete the task but it was in constant use by other persons, when it eventually became free I had already been at work for over 11.5 hrs, to stay and complete the task would have required me to be at work for between 14.5 and 16 hrs.

So I delegated the task to another individual who unfortunately made a few mistakes,

A “conversation” was held between my manager And I the following week, when I gave my full explanation and apologies and thought the matter dealt with, but this apparently is now an issue and appears to prove my bad attitude towards him.

 

is there a maximum hours per shift you can be expected to work, I am contracted to 7.5 hrs with a 1/2 hour unpaid break any 5 over 7 24/7 though I regularly work between 50-55 hrs per week.

 

I feel like a duck on water, gliding easily on top, but paddling like hell below the surface.

 

Any further advice gratefully received.

Edited by Bridgemaster
after thought
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bridgemaster.............. sorry to hear you are being bullied at work and bullied you certainly are being. Have a look at this site and you will see the various methods that bullies use. http://www.bullyonline.org/workbully/bully.htm.

 

The fact that you don't remember them tells me that the attitude of the manager is such that the atmosphere must be awful there. These type of people use others that they see as less able to defend themselves as their targets. I bet he has "favourites" too and I wouldn't be surprised if these favourites are set for promotion into spots that are created from those that leave because they can't stand anymore.

 

What I would advise is that whatever the outcome of hearing that you should start to make notes of the incidents that will eventually form a pattern for you to use in evidence. Have a good look at your company's policy regarding Bullying in the Workplace you may at some time need that. Unfortunately now that you are a target you will find it difficult to extricate yourself from his clutches and his bosses will also just rubber stamp the bully's decisions. They normally act true to form.

 

So dig in on the evidence front until the time when you are unlikely to survive and then hit the company with the lot. Perhaps they will then see what kind of person they have. The only other bright spot is that through his bullying the company will lose good workers and will be unable to keep new recruits.

 

What industry are you in?Any chance of getting out to another company (I know it is difficult out there just now)? It may be that you would be better off out in any case, bullying can really be corrosive and affect your mental and physical health my wife and I have just fought a 3 year bullying and discrimination case against a NHS Trust.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll make a bold suggestion, join a union, a lot of unions are there to make sure that management do there job correctly and will not challenge "protocol" I joined a union called "Solidarity", a lot of it's reps are from the National Liberal Party, however, they did a great job at representing me. Indeed if it was not for them I would have been sacked!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...