Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hmm yes I see your point about proof of postage but nonetheless... "A Notice to Keeper can be served by ordinary post and the Protection of Freedoms Act requires that the Notice, to be valid,  must be delivered either (Where a notice to driver (parking ticket) has been served) Not earlier than 28 days after, nor more than 56 days after, the service of that notice to driver; or (Where no notice to driver has been served (e.g ANPR is used)) Not later than 14 days after the vehicle was parked A notice sent by post is to be presumed, unless the contrary is proved, to have been delivered on the second working day after the day on which it is posted; and for this purpose “working day” means any day other than a Saturday, Sunday or a public holiday in England and Wales." My question there is really what might constitute proof? Since you say the issue of delivery is a common one I suppose that no satisfactory answer has been established or you would probably have told me.
    • I would stand your ground and go for the interest. Even if the interest is not awarded you will get the judgement and the worst that might happen is that you won't get your claim fee.  However, it is almost inevitable that you will get the interest.  It is correct that it is at the discretion of the judge but the discretion is almost always exercised in favour of the claimant in these cases.  I think you should stand your ground and don't give even the slightest penny away Another judgement against them on this issue would be very bad for them and they would be really stupid to risk it but if they did, it would cost them far more than the interest they are trying to save which they will most likely have to pay anyway
    • Yep, true to form, they are happy to just save a couple of quid... They invariably lose in court, so to them, that's a win. 😅
    • Your concern regarding the 14 days delivery is a common one. Not been on the forum that long, but I don't think the following thought has ever been challenged. My view is that they should have proof of when it was posted, not when they "issued", or printed it. Of course, they would never show any proof of postage, unless it went to court. Private parking companies are simply after money, and will just keep sending ever more threatening letters to intimidate you into paying up. It's not been mentioned yet, but DO NOT APPEAL! You could inadvertently give up useful legal protection and they will refuse any appeal, because they're just after the cash...  
    • The sign says "Parking conditions apply 24/7". Mind you, that's after a huge wall of text. The whole thing is massively confusing.  Goodness knows what you're meant to do if you spend only a fiver in Iceland or you stay a few minutes over the hour there.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell-Red Debt. How many have been actually bankrupt??


Lemmein
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4988 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

No this is just a general question that popped in my head after reading through sooo many threads about Lowell and Red..

 

I will be requesting assistance about my situation in the next couple of weeks..

 

It does seem a little odd doesnt it? That with so many SD's, Threats, Letters and a (supposed) visits, not many at all (if any) have been made bankrupt? Surely it means something..

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep lowells/reds, rarely have the correct paperwork to recover any debts via the courts..what tends to happen is they write/ring threaten..etc etc...once people find their way to cag they are given the advice which is normally accepted....after a few letters back and forth...lowlifes/reds go away and posters dont hear from them again..hence the end of thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suppose some of the reasons why some threads die off is that the poster doesn't follow up with the advice given and just continues along the same sort of lines that resulted in them coming to CAG in the first place and so their situation remains unresolved and spirals futher out of their control.

Or, they either forget or can't be bothered to update the forum.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

hi my wife has been threatened with bankruptcy by lowell,it is over a debt that we genuinely cannot remember taking out .

so in may we sent a request for proof of this alleged debt, we didnt hear anything from them for a few weeks th en one day we got a creep knocking at our door and handing a bankruptcy petition to us as you can imagine we were somewhat angered by this .

when we contacted lowell and pointed out to them that we had no knowledge of this debt , they eventually agreed to have the bankruptcy petition dismissed .

two weeks ago we recieved a credit agreement through the post from lowell it contained one sheetb of paper which is not very legible but it does have my wifes name on it and is dated january 2002 this is the only evidence they have provided , we have aske for a statement of account and a deed of assignment but neither of these have been forthcoming , anyway we spoke to lowell yesreday and they have told us they intend to commence bankruptcy proceedings once again against my wife

IF ANYONE COULD ADVISE US ON WERE WE WE STAND IT WOULD BE VERY MUCH APPRECIATED

Link to post
Share on other sites

Stop talking to them on the phone, do everything in writing. The first thing you need to do is to get the SD set aside. Others who are more familiar with the procedure can best advise you on that, but you do only have a limited time, so you need to get the ball rolling.

Link to post
Share on other sites

how long ago were you handed this stat demand?

also if this alleged debt is from 2002 then it is well and truly statute barred if you havent made a payment in the last 6 years nor acknowledged that the debt is yours

suggest you send this

Dear Sir/Madam

I do not acknowledge any debt with your company

Acc/Ref No

you have contacted me regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself.

I would point out that under the Limitation Act 1980 Section 5 “an action founded on simple contract shall not be brought after the expiration of six years from the date on which the cause of action accrued.”

I would also point out that the OFT say under their Debt Collection Guidance on statute barred debt that “it is unfair to pursue the debt if the debtor has heard nothing from the creditor during the relevant limitation period”.

The last payment of this alleged debt was made over six years ago and no further acknowledgement or payment has been made since that time. Unless you can provide evidence of payment or written contact from us in the relevant period under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, we suggest that you are no longer able to take any court action against us to recover the alleged amount claimed.

The OFT Debt Collection Guidance states further that “continuing to press for payment after a debtor has stated that they will not be paying a debt because it is statute barred could amount to harassment contrary to section 40 (1) of the Administration of Justice Act 1970”.

I await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed and that no further contact/action will be made concerning the above account after that last letter.

 

I look forward to your reply.

 

Yours faithfully

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi thanks for your comments ,yes we are homeowners but like a lot of people our house is in negative equity so lowell wont get anything there,iam going to try to post a copy of the credit agreement so maybe someone can advise on its enforcability, regards , steve

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...