Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx Yes sorry. they called it a deed at first in court.  Then Judge said she was happy to have it sealed as something else  exact names of orders in message above.     The disease was tested for when his cardiac testing was done immediately after purchase and part of the now sealed case.   However, results were disclosed incorrectly and I only found out  two days ago.   This disease did not form part of my knowledge during the case as I had been informed of a normal result that was not the case.   it is perfect clarity of a genetic disease where as the previous cardiac issue could be congenital until the pup is genetically tested. 
    • Hi, Halifax recently sold a credit card account of mine to Cabot. I am unemployed and have no assets and was thinking of making token £1 payments for 12-18 months in order to drag things out a bit and reduce the chance of Cabot being able to get the correct CCA documents from Halifax if I requested them in future. However, I saw on the pages on this forum about defending county court claims that one of the standard approaches when defending such claims is to say “I had an account with bank X, but I don’t remember the details and so don’t know if I owe this debt…”. If I made £1 payments to Cabot, would it prevent me from using such a defence in future? OC: Halifax DC: Cabot/Wescot Card account opened: 2016 Defaulted: 2023
    • Paperwork says sealed consent order and composite settlement agreement      YES  ADDISONS DISEASE 
    • Hi, This may be the wrong place for a thread BUT If you receive a defence, can you send a CPR 31.14 request for document mentioned in the defence, and then apply to proceed with the case only after (14) days passed or they respond OR is it only if you receive a claim I see @dx100uk thread is for when you receive a claim, but can you also do the same when you receive a defence?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Crapquest-natwest


marinachild
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4934 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

:|Hi

I have had a disputed issue with Nat West since 2003. Birmingham Lending Centre closed my account without my knowledge and I ended up with a 2500 debt.In 2005 I was advised by FSA to make minimum payment of £10. NAT WEST sent this to DCA namely WESCOTT and in last 2 years its been with CRAPQUEST. They keep asking for standing orders - declined. theyve threatened my 70 old father with breaking into his property. Nat West wont send a final letter for me to go to FSA. Ive paid in 7 years over 1500 pounds but between NAT west and the DCA. the amounts outstanding flactuates.

 

What can i do..

 

What sequence of letters do i need to write.

 

Please help

Link to post
Share on other sites

they can do nothing of the sort

they are a DCA they have NO LEGAL POWERS.

and even if it went to court and they got a CCJ and you forgot to pay it,

NO BAILIFF could ever bust your door down on a civil debt...utter cods wallop!

if you have that in writing i'd go complain now.

 

right the debt.........

 

what is it and whats the history...is this an old OD?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Original debt was a £1000 bridging loan which I started to pay back. Birmingham lending center closed the account with informing me. I had my utility bills and mortgage. They all defaulted. At one point I had excess charges of 950 pounds. FSA has complaint Nat west refuses final letter. Now stuck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send them a CCA request to see if they are entitled to collect this debt & if it's enforcable. If they fail to provide it within 12 working days from receipt, or the CCA is unenforcable you can legally withold any payment until they do. Send it recorded delivery enclosing a £1 postal order. When you get a reply, scan it & remove any identifying details and post it back here where we can have a look at it. We'll advise you from there;

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Re:- Account No: XXXXXXXX/Your Reference Number: XXXXXXX

 

This letter is a formal request pursuant to s.77/78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. I require you to provide me with a true copy of the credit agreement relating to the above account, together with any other documentation the Act requires you to provide.

 

I expect you to comply fully and properly with this request, within the statutory time limit. You are reminded that should you fail to comply with my request, the provisions of s.77 will apply.

 

If it is your view that you are not the creditor, s.175 of the CCA 1974 applies in the case of a simple assignment, and places a duty upon you to pass this request to the creditor. In the case of an absolute assignment, you are a creditor as defined by s.189. If you contend that you purchased the rights but not the duties of any agreement, you are reminded that s.189 of the Act is clear that an assignment is of both rights and duties.

 

Your attention is drawn to ss.5(2), 3(b),6 and 7 of the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 (CPUTR). I enclose a postal order in the sum of £1.00, which is the statutory fee. Note that these funds are not to be used for any other purpose.

 

If you intend to send a reconstituted copy of the CCA you must declare the reason why it has been reconstituted and if the original exists and in what form (microfiche) etc.

 

If you are unable to comply fully and properly with this request, you should confirm this in writing at the earliest opportunity, and certainly within the statutory time limit for compliance, and return the fee.

 

Furthermore, with regards to the quantity and frequency of telephone calls that I have received from your company, which I deem to be personally harassing.

 

I have verbally requested that these stop, but I am still receiving calls. (Delete if necessary)

 

I now require all further correspondence from your company to be made in writing only.

 

You are reminded of the following under Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008.

 

Trading Standards can bring about a prosecution if, with the object of coercing another person to pay money claimed from the other as a debt due under contract, he or she:

 

(a) harasses the other with demands for payment which by their frequency, or the manner or occasion of their making, or any accompanying threat or publicity are calculated to subject him or his family or household to alarm, distress or humiliation;

(b) falsely represents, in relation to the money claimed, that criminal proceedings lie for failure to pay it;

© falsely represent themselves to be authorized in some official capacity to claim or enforce payment;

(d) utters a document falsely represented by him to have some official character or purporting to have some official character which he knows it has not.

 

I am of the view that your harassment of me by telephone puts you in breach of the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008, and the Protection from Harassment Act 1997.

 

If you continue to harass me by telephone, you will also be in breach of the Communications Act (2003) s.127 and I will report you to OFCOM, Trading Standards and The Office of Fair Trading, meaning that you will be liable to a substantial fine.

 

Further to this if it is your intention to arrange a call from your 'Doorstep Collectors', I note that there is only an implied license under English Common Law for certain people to visit me on my property without express permission; the postman and people asking for directions etc (Armstrong v. Sheppard and Short Ltd [1959] 2 Q.B. per Lord Evershed M.R.).

 

Take note, I revoke license under English Common Law for you, or any of your representatives to visit me at my property and if you do so without my permission, you will then be liable to damages for a tort of trespass. You would also be conspiring in a trespass if you sent someone to visit me nevertheless. Any trespassers you attempt to send therefore will be dealt with accordingly.Be further advised that any further telephone calls from your company will be recorded.

 

(Print in red optional addition)

 

I look forward to hearing from you.

 

Yours faithfully **Edit to suit**

 

(Print do not sign signature)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks

 

This has dragged its heels since 2003. Don't u just love divorce.

Nat West held it for 5 years. FSA advised me to keep making the minimum token payment.

I've got my letters for. Crapquest and Natwest.

I've informed the idiots that the debts in dispute..

Will up date

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

FSA complaint lodged since day 1.

 

Nat West refuse to send a final letter.

 

Stalemate

 

I've been paying 15.00pm as per FSA 9 years.

 

Natwest sold debt to 3 DCAs and now Crapquest.

 

I've refused their threats.

 

Nat West closed account 6 yrs ago without notice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

who did you CCA?

 

this is stupid

i bet nothing has actually gone off the debts

its just lined the dca's pockets

 

sadly what they call a cash-cow debt.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The 15.00 payments went direct to Nat West.

My father religiously went for tea n biscuits every pension day.

The girl at Nat West used to wait for him.

The whole issue was mad.

The holding bank where the account sat couldn't explain Birmingham lending centres reason for closing account.

It was done without my knowledge. I had held an account there since I was 19 nearly 20 yrs.

Birmingham lending centre stated on phone that it was my fault I was divorced.

FSA have had this complaint since then.

Like I said in my earlier posts this issue has been ongoing since 2001

I can't do anything unless Prat Best (Nat west) send a final letter.

They won't - stalemate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No paperwork with my name on it.

No signature of mine.

 

It's got a telephone transcript of my convo.

 

Nothing exciting....

 

 

It'll be interesting to see what turns up on this.

An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. <br />

Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hello

Received a letter from Crapquest

 

We Thank you for your recent correspondence and can confirm that our clients requests that your request for information in reference to this account is signed before they take action.

 

Please resubmit your signed request quoting the Consumer Credit Act with the attached £1 post order fee previously supplied.

 

Collections Administration Department

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello

Received a letter from Crapquest

 

We Thank you for your recent correspondence and can confirm that our clients requests that your request for information in reference to this account is signed before they take action.

 

Please resubmit your signed request quoting the Consumer Credit Act with the attached £1 post order fee previously supplied.

 

Collections Administration Department

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send them this;

 

Dear Sirs,

 

RE Account NO XXXXXXXX

 

Thank you for your letter dated xx/xx/2009 in which you say that you will not comply with my request dated xxx under s.78(1) of the `Consumer Credit Act 1974 unless I provide you with a signature.

 

There is no requirement under the Act that require a s.78(1) request to be accompanied by a signature, and I am unable to accede to your request.

 

Further, I note that you have sent statements and correspondence containing sensitive private information to me at same address as that detailed in my s.78(1) request. If you are concerned that you are corresponding with the correct person I wonder why you have not verified the information before.

 

As you are aware, disclosing data without adequate checks of identity is contrary to the 7th principal of data protection, listed in schedule 1 of the Data protection Act 1998. The time to confirm my identity was before you sent your first threat letter.

 

My request for a true copy of my credit agreement under section 78(1) was made on xx/xx/2009 and the 12 working days for your compliance expire on xx/xx/2009. I note that there is no provision that removes the requirements of the act to provide this information on time, even if you are unsure of my identity.

 

Please now comply with your legal obligation without further delay.

 

Regards Print name do not sign.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All

I re sent my letters with my £1 postal order.

 

On 6th October received this, which some what concerns me.

 

This is from crappyquest.

 

Further to our communication dated 22 February 10.

 

It is apparent that we need to start litigation process to resolve this matter.

 

As you will be aware we have communicated with you over a period of time to resolve this without the need for legal action.

 

Extra costs incurred as a result of any litigation will be added to your balance , if we succeed in obtaining judgement against you.

 

My name is ***** *********** and I am appointed as your case handling supervisor.

 

Together with my team, it is my responsibility to progress your account through litigation process, but also to assist and inform you on any query or question you may have.

 

Your case will be processed and passed to our solicitors on or around 10 October 10 a process that you can stop by telephoning 0870 084 **** to discuss your account , and reach an amicable solution.

 

I Will not be demanding payment in full. I will be open to suggestions from you on how this account can be settled. I have the authority to make any arrangements that may save you a considerable amount of money.

 

You still have the opportunity to stop legal action and possibly settle this account over a period of time and by a method suitable to you.

 

I trust that you will recognise that my appointment is an indication of imminent commencement of legal proceedings. I trust you will take this opportunity to save yourself the possible expense of litigation and the problems that any litigation in which we were successful would possibly cause to your credit file.

 

Yours sincerely

***** ***********

Litigation department

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...