Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Paragraph 18 – you are still talking about Boston stolen items. About time this was fixed??? Paragraph 19  In any event, the claimant's PS5 gaming device was correctly declared and correctly valued. The defendant accepted it for carriage and was even prepared to earn extra money by selling sell insurance in case of its loss or damage. New paragraph 20 – this the defendant routinely sells insurance in respect of "no compensation" items (a secondary contract contrary to section 72 CRA 2015) new paragraph above paragraph 20 – the defendant purports to limit its liability in respect of lost or damaged items. This is contrary to section 57 of the consumer rights act 2015. The defendant offers to extend their liability if their customer purchases an insurance cover for an extra sum of money. This insurance is a secondary contract calculated to exclude or limit their liability for the defendants contractual breaches and is contrary to section 72 of the consumer rights act 2015. New paragraph below paragraph 42 – the defendant merely relies on "standard industry practice" You haven't pointed to the place in your bundle of the Telegraph newspaper extract. You have to jiggle the paragraphs around. Even though I have suggested new paragraph numbers, the order I have suggested is on your existing version 5. You will have to work it out for your next version. Good luck!   Let's see version 6 Separately, would you be kind enough to send me an unredacted to me at our admin email address.
    • i think theres been MORE than amble evidence of that and am astonished that criminal proceedings haven't begun.
    • Yep, those 'requirements' not met to shareholders satisfaction seem to me to be: 1. Not being allowed to increase customer bills by 40% (of which well over 50% of the new total would NOT be investment) 2. 1 plus regulators not agreeing to letting them do 'things in their own time (ie carry on regardless)
    • As already mentioned freely available "credit scores" are fairly useless. All lenders have their own "credit scoring" system, that for obvious reasons they don't divulge. And they're "scored" differently to the freely available ones. As soon as they could, we've always encouraged our two children to use credit cards responsibly... Pay off in full, etc, to generate good history. It's paid off. At quite young ages, they have both obtained loans for cars, mortgage and their credit card limits are through the roof. Personally, I have shifted debt around a lot on credit cards (even financed a house purchase once at 0% 😉) and I've only ever been refused a credit card once, sorry twice by the same company, over many years. They must have something very different in their lending criteria. You're a tight one, Mr Branson.
    • Hi DX - quick question, what is the bank likely to do when they get my letter of change of address ? also what is the worst they can do? thanks J1L
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham PCN Sunday


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4969 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham's

eager attendant issued a pcn on 26 April 2009

- a Sunday when i was parked in metered zone

- outside of parking restrictions.

 

 

The parking restritions were Mon - Sat.

 

 

i parked on a sunday.

but I received a parking ticket anyway.

 

 

Due to various personal problems i forgot about the PCN

but wrote to LBHF some time later and explained that it was a sunday

and the parking restrictions were not enforced then.

I did not hear from them and then forgot about the ticket until

 

 

i got a note (shoved through my letter box) by a bailiff demanding £ 535.

I phoned LBHF parking office and spoke with an official in the parking office

- who confirmed that Sunday restrictions were to be encforced on 14 Dec 2009 on the road in question.

He then confirmed that i was parked legally.

 

 

When i asked him to cancel the ticket - he said he could not as much time had passed

and the case had progressed and i had to deal with the bailiff.

 

 

He said i could quote his name and the conversation.

He said that the conversation was taped anyway.

 

Then i had a call from the bailiff on my mobile

- i do not know how he got my mobile number

- who asked me to pay the full £535

or he will come to my house and take things.

 

i can handle the bailiff to a certain extent as i will simply not answer the door when he comes.

 

i hv written to my local MP and submitted an official complaint to LBHF.

 

I contacted Traffic Enforcement Centre to see if they can help.

They said i can submit a statutory Satement Out of time,

but i needed to qualify to 4 "preset" conditions in TE9 and TE 7 forms.

- and i do not know if my situation qualifies.

 

Can any one advise me on the regulations relating to PCN's issued incorrectly?

What can I do now?

my personal opinion is to serve a writ to LBHF for

a. issuing a PCN incorrectly

b. subsequently trying to extort money using bully tactics and bailiffs

c. committing Fraud

 

can some one pl advise.

 

By the way

- if you think about howmany tickets these guys issued "incorrectly"

that were paid by people who just could not stomach a fight

- thats an awful lot of income for these councils.

 

all the best - BF

Edited by burmafriday
Link to post
Share on other sites

legally parked but Parking ticket issued anyway

 

 

London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham's eager attendant issued a pcn
link3.gif
on 26 April 2009 - a Sunday when i was parked in metered zone - outside of parking restrictions. The parking restritions were Mon - Sat. i parked on a sunday. but I received a parking ticket anyway. Due to various personal problems i forgot about the PCN but wrote to LBHF some time later and explained that it was a sunday and the parking restrictions were not enforced then. I did not hear from them and then forgot about the ticket until i got a note (shoved through my letter box) by a bailiff
link3.gif
demanding £ 535. I phoned LBHF parking office and spoke with an official in the parking office - who confirmed that Sunday restrictions were to be encforced on 14 Dec 2009 on the road in question.
He then confirmed that i was parked legally
. When i asked him to cancel the ticket - he said he could not as much time had passsed and the case had progressed and i had to deal with the bailiff. He said i could quote his name and the conversation. He said that the conversation was taped anyway.

 

Then i had a call from the bailiff on my mobile - i do not know how he got my mobile number - who asked me to pay the full £535 or he will come to my house and take things.

 

i can handle the bailiff to a certain extent as i will simply not answer the door when he comes.

 

i hv written to my local MP and submitted an official complaint to LBHF.

 

I contacted Traffic Enforcement Centre to see if they can help. They said i can submit a statutory Satement Out of time, but i needed to qualify to 4 "preset" conditions in TE9 and TE 7 forms.

- and i do not know if my situation qualifies.

 

Can any one advise me on the regulations relating to PCN's issued incorrectly?

What can I do now?

my personal opinion is to serve a writ to LBHF for

a. issuing a PCN incorrectly

b. subsequently trying to extort money using bully tactics and bailiffs
link3.gif

c. committing Fraud

 

can some one pl advise.

 

By the way - if you think about howmany tickets these guys issued "incorrectly" that were paid by people who just could not stomach a fight - thats an awful lot of income for these councils.

 

all the best - BF

Link to post
Share on other sites

legally parked but Parking ticket issued anyway

 

 

Can any one advise me on the regulations relating to PCN's issued incorrectly?

What can I do now?

my personal opinion is to serve a writ to LBHF for

a. issuing a PCN incorrectly

b. subsequently trying to extort money using bully tactics and bailiffs
link3.gif

c. committing Fraud

 

 

 

 

 

I like your personal opinion.

 

I am sure a traffic 'oracle' will post with relavent info for you soon.

 

 

:)

 

 

dk

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can try and file an Out of Time statutory Declaration. You can file it on the grounds that you made representations (ie your appeal letter) and did not receive a response.

 

However, because it is out of time, the council could refuse to accept it. You will have to provide a good reason as to why it was not filed in time, and you may struggle to do so (I don't know your circumstances). If there's a good reason, then attach some proof with your forms - eg if you were ill, a medical note or somesuch.

 

If they accept it, you're back where you started with a straight PCN which you can challenge. If not, post back here - you would have one more route left - N244.

 

It might be worth speaking to someone at the council who deals with bailiff cases (they probably have a dedicated team) and try and get them to understand and agree to put things on hold. Be as friendly to that person as you can!! They will deal with the case and have the power to call off the bailiffs, once your forms are through.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for fast response.

 

Well Dragonkeeper, I've written to LBHF stating exactly that!

I've also written to my local MP and was really surpirsed to receive a reply from his assistance pretty much stratightaway. I am told that they will write to LBHF and get back to me.

 

Hi Jamberson - i understand that i cannot use N244 here. regarding Out of time Statutory statement - i am not sure if i qualify the four criteria they set.

thats the problem. i did make representations and did not get their response - but i found their email response much later in my outlook. which prompted me to write to them.but i see what you are saying. OK - i'll do that tonight and send it in to Traffic Enforcement Centre

 

thanks so much for yr fast replies

 

warm regards/BF

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they only replied to your letter by email, it is pretty much fine to assert you didn't receive their reply. Anyone could have read it and deleted it. They are required to reply by post (as least they were - unless it's changed of late).

 

So, I say go ahead and file one on that basis. See what happens. N244 becomes a possibility if they reject your applications, but hopefully they won't - up to them, sadly!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...