Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Need help with Marlin F S


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4993 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi guys, new here so be kind:smile:

 

My OH had a credit card debt of £2,861.53p with Clydesdale and was taken to Sheriff Court where a decree was granted and a time to pay direction was made. This included expenses of £260.70p plus 8% interest per annum. Payments commenced on April 2005, he never missed one, but on November last year Clydesdale transfered the debt to Marlin Financial services............he has a letter from Clydesdale dated Nov 2009 stating the balance was £2.042.23p. Got a new payment book from Marlin and carried on paying his £20 per month and all seemed fine until he received a letter from Marlin on June this year offering to reduce his debt by 10% for a lump sum of £2,411.34 and that the debt currently stood at £2,679.25.

 

This makes no sense to us at all...how could it go from the sum the Clydesdale stated was owed in November 2009 to over £600 more by Marlin's calculations. I have tried writing but I got a breakdown with interest at 41p per day and my sums are not that great to be honest.

 

Can anyone help? what can I do to get this sorted. thank in advance guys.

Link to post
Share on other sites

naughty

they cannot vary the terms of the decree.

 

have you a total on the decree?

 

try using:

http://www.egalegal.com/compoundWindow.html

 

to work it out

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for replying. The decree states: Sum decerned for £2,861, 53P with interest thereon at the rate of 8% per annum until payment, and granted decree against offender for £260.70 for payment of expenses. Payable by instalments of £20 per month commencing 7th April 2005. I tried working it out with your link but I think I must be doing something wrong.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi Heather and Welcome to CAG

 

it looks as tho the statement from Clydesdale did not include the interest

 

you are paying £240 per year and the interest started at nearly £250 per year and now down to about £215 a year

 

as this is via a court order the only advice i can give you at the moment would be:

 

if at any time you have extra monies that you can pay then do it to try and reduce it quicker

 

or if you were in a position to offer a full and final - don't be afraid to do so even if you feel it's not enough - they can only say yes or no

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Idainfife, I never thought of that. Silly Clydesdale again LOL. Offering Marlin a lump sum isn't really an option for us at the moment so they'll have to settle for the £20 per month.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...