Jump to content
  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi everyone. We purchased a new bed from dreams 26/12/2017 which was delivered 01/02/2018.  We also purchased their delivery, assembly, take the old one away, tv, mattress, mattress protector, pillows and their 'bed cover' 8 years extended warranty.  We paid by 30 monthly interest free instalments and so just made the final payment.   It is a heavy duty king size lift up storage bed with a built in tv at the end.  It has always been a struggle to lift, my wife cannot do it on her own and it rarely stays up by itself.   At the beginning of this year, we noticed it had started to dip considerably in the middle.  Not the mattress, but the wooden base the mattress is on.  So on 09/02/2020 I emailed them about the issue.  They started by saying the mattress is not covered only the base, until I pointed out it is the base at fault not the mattress.  So they sent out Homeserve on the 25/02/2020 to come and repair.  He did what he called a temporary repair, said that the bed had failed due to a manufacturing or design fault (the metal bolts holding the wooden base to the lift up supports have pulled out of the wood) and that dreams would be in touch to arrange a replacement.  His temporary repair barely lasted a day, the bed was still dipping and he took plenty of photos for himself but seemed in a mad rush to leave.   Of course they didn't contact us, so on 30/03/2020 I emailed them back.  01/04/2020 they emailed back confirming in writing that it is a manufacturing fault and their sales team would contact me, however as expected due to Covid-19 this may take a while.   30/06/2020 I asked for an update.  03/07/2020 they replied saying their claims department would contact me within 5 working days.  They didn't. 15/07/2020 I emailed back asking them to escalate my complaint as well as providing a refund and compensation as we are now struggling to sleep and experiencing back ache due to the bed's extreme dipping, plus I am worried about the mattress getting damaged. 23/07/2020 They replied saying we are not entitled to a refund as it is a guarantee claim and they have passed it once again this time to their guarantee company to contact us. I have still not heard back.   This is now getting beyond a joke and I wanted some guidance on how I should proceed.  We are struggling to sleep in the bed and cannot now even open the bed to access our belongings inside as as soon as you try and lift you hear the sound of breaking wood.   Many thanks  
    • bit obv really... don't eat yellow snow either.   dx  
    • I know you are trivialising this as, 'Ambulance Chasing Lawyers', because they are perceived to be involved. You mention BMW (other brands as well). Counterfeit car and truck parts have been implicated, and proven to be the cause, of accidents where fatalities have occurred.   There is some considerable difference between a set of counterfeit brake pads and a fake SD Card.   The trademark infringement though, is the same.   H
    • One hope in this growing mess is that local authorities, mainly in the north west so far, like Liverpool, are developing their own systems to test and trace, filling in the gaps of what Serco et al are missing.   But they're doing it with precious little in the way of funding. In the meantime it looks as if Serco [I think it's them] will be given more hundreds of millions on top of the £100 million that hasn't been effective so far in a couple of weeks. Given that the PM has swanned off to Scotland for a couple of weeks this isn't looking good.
    • i've known 10yrs of DD's to be refunded. the company must prove a valid contract for the period. no proof the DD's all get refunded   dx  
  • Our picks

    • Curry’s cancelled my order but took the money anyway. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/423055-curry%E2%80%99s-cancelled-my-order-but-took-the-money-anyway/
      • 11 replies
    • Father passed away - Ardent Credit Services (Vodafone) now claiming he owes money. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/423040-father-passed-away-ardent-credit-services-vodafone-now-claiming-he-owes-money/
      • 9 replies
    • Currys Refuse Refund F/Freezer 5day old. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422656-currys-refuse-refund-ffreezer-5day-old/
      • 6 replies
    • Hi,  
      I was in Sainsbury’s today and did scan and shop.
      I arrived in after a busy day at work and immediately got distracted by the clothes.
       
      I put a few things in my trolley and then did a shop.
      I paid and was about to get into my car when the security guard stopped me and asked me to come back in.
       
      I did and they took me upstairs.
      I was mortified and said I forgot to scan the clothes and a conditioner, 5 items.
      I know its unacceptable but I was distracted and Initially hadn’t really planned to use scan and shop.
       
      No excuse.
      I offered to pay for the goods but the manager said it was too late.
      He looked at the CCTV and because I didn’t try to scan the items he was phoning the police.
       
      The cost of the items was about £40.
      I was crying at this point and told them I was a nurse, just coming from work and I could get struck off.
       
      They rang the police anyway and they came and issued me with a community resolution notice, which goes off my record in a year.
      I feel terrible. I have to declare this to my employer and NMC.
       
      They kept me in a room on my own with 4 staff and have banned me from all stores.
      The police said if I didn’t do the community order I would go to court and they would refer me to the PPS.
       
      I’m so stressed,
      can u appeal this or should I just accept it?
       
      Thanks for reading 
      • 16 replies
rickyquicky

Parking fine at train station

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 3611 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hi, could any of you knowledgeable people give me some advice?

 

I recieved a parking ticket at a railway station last december, it was for 'failing to display', I had purchased a ticket but it had gone into the gap between the windscreen and although not obvious to see, it was there, and the the date was clearly visible.

 

Annoyed at the ticket being issued I tore off the parking notice, and ignored it. I never heard from them up until last month (7 months later) advising me I was liable and was required to pay.

 

I ignored that too since it was such a long time (and reading up on similar posts on the forum), but have now recieved a letter today from 'PCN debt recovery and prosecution service':

 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Mr ...........

 

On 01/12/2009 you were the registered owner/keepr/hirer of vehicle reg number ......... when parking charge notice ........... was issued because the vehicle was allegedly involved in the following parking contarevtion:

 

'Failing to display a valid ticket or voucher at ........ train station'

 

A 'notice to owner' was sent to you as the registered owner/keeper/hirer of the vehicle because a parking charge notice (PCN) was issued to the vehicle shown above and to date the due payment has not been recieved, nor has any other information been recieved to negate liability.

 

If you fail to pay this charge in full within 14 days from the date of this letter you will face prosecution at magistrates court under railway byelaw 14.

 

(This is more text that is probably not relevant at the moment)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

What in your expert opinions is my best course of action? I no longer have any documentation, ticket etc as it was so long ago.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

need to see the PCN and the letter. some are valid as they are pursued by the railway company under the byelaws.

Yours sound like it might be such a case.

 

they are relatively rare - mostly its a PPC having a go.

 

need to see to know.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It could be they've wised up to using the byelaws and knowing which court to threaten with. The fact that they are using the term parking charge notice would tend to indicate it's a PPC attempting to claim under contract law.

 

Best bet is to post up the notice. You could also contact Network rail and/or the Train Operating Company and ask if the PPC are managing the car park on their behalf?


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This does not constitute legal advice and is not represented as a substitute for legal advice from an appropriately qualified person or firm.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Breach of byelaws results in a penalty though. Genuine tickets tend to be plastered with the word.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If they are threatening magistrates court under byelaw 14 when it is in fact a PPC private invoice, that would be extremely naughty and would need to be brought to tthe attention of the authorities.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

PPC versions normally mention the byelaw thing and then use the usual wording for chasing as a civil matter.

 

we need to see it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for all the replies so far.

 

I wont be able to scan and upload until later. Until then, I have noticed that at the bottom of the letter it says "London and South Eastern railway limited trading as Debt recovery and Prosecution services"

 

Would this suggest that it is actually the railway company chasing this up?

 

Does the fact they didnt contact me for 7 months not mean anything?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The railway company can chase up alleged debts like any other private company. It doesn't mean it's a legitimate fine though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is highly likely to be under the byelaws if the Railway Company is chasing it.

We need to see the letter, the ticket and the signs and lines.

And it would still need to be won in Magistrate's Court.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

subbing


Please remember our troops, fighting and dying in our name. God protect them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Subbing - meaning I am subscribing to the thread. I had nothing to add at that stage but it is a topic I have an interest in, so I will now receive updates when new posts are made.

regards


Please remember our troops, fighting and dying in our name. God protect them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the replies so far, here is a scanned copy of the last letter recieved from them.

 

The PCN was originally issued by NCP.

PCN.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's an invoice from a private company. It's a "Parking Charge Notice" and the PPCs are not allowed to use the "Penalty Charge Notice" because they don't have any real powers to collect it.

 

Though it hasn't been challenged in court sufficiently - they threaten court action but seem never to actually go to court for whatever reason - it's pretty much likely that you can just treat it as an unenforceable invoice, ignore it, not pay it, and just put all their letters under the bed or something.


The above post constitutes my personal opinion on the facts in the post compared with my personal knowledge of the applicable legislation. I make no guarantees of its legal accuracy. If you are in doubt seek advice of a legal professional specialising in the area concerned.

 

If my post has helped you please click my scales!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Standard disclaimer, as with any advice on a forum from amateurs, seek professional advice if you are not sure.


The above post constitutes my personal opinion on the facts in the post compared with my personal knowledge of the applicable legislation. I make no guarantees of its legal accuracy. If you are in doubt seek advice of a legal professional specialising in the area concerned.

 

If my post has helped you please click my scales!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's an invoice from a private company. It's a "Parking Charge Notice" and the PPCs are not allowed to use the "Penalty Charge Notice" because they don't have any real powers to collect it.

 

Though it hasn't been challenged in court sufficiently - they threaten court action but seem never to actually go to court for whatever reason - it's pretty much likely that you can just treat it as an unenforceable invoice, ignore it, not pay it, and just put all their letters under the bed or something.

 

I was just warning against your assumption that the ticket was from a PPC and to ignore it as Debt Recovery & Prosecution Service act for the railway companies. If it is dealt with under byelaw 14, ignoring it may result in a magistrates court summons.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The wording implies it is. Only local authorities - i.e. enforceable tickets - can use the term "penalty charge notice". If you could use this term, making your ticket legally enforceable (though the PPC's ticket is yet to withstand case law, we can at present presume it is not enforceable), you would do so.

Hence by the wording you can presume it was issued by a company with the power only to invoice as oppose to fine. A solicitor on another forum I discussed this with earlier disputes the stance this is completely unenforceable but given the way such cases have historically panned out, it probably is fair enough that this is treated as a PPC invoice and ignored...


The above post constitutes my personal opinion on the facts in the post compared with my personal knowledge of the applicable legislation. I make no guarantees of its legal accuracy. If you are in doubt seek advice of a legal professional specialising in the area concerned.

 

If my post has helped you please click my scales!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A Parking Charge Notice issued under the Railway Byelaws cannot be called a Penalty Charge Notice as they can only be issued by local authority CEOs for contraventions under decriminalised parking laws. Unfortunately PPCs also call their invoices Parking Charge Notices, as they also cannot call them Penalty Charge Notices.

 

The OP needs to establish if the notice was issued on behalf of the railway company under byelaw 14 and deal with it if it was, rather than assume it is a PPC invoice and ignoring it, and ending up with a summons.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All very logical, but if you can call it a penalty charge notice, you would?


The above post constitutes my personal opinion on the facts in the post compared with my personal knowledge of the applicable legislation. I make no guarantees of its legal accuracy. If you are in doubt seek advice of a legal professional specialising in the area concerned.

 

If my post has helped you please click my scales!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
A Parking Charge Notice issued under the Railway Byelaws cannot be called a Penalty Charge Notice as they can only be issued by local authority CEOs for contraventions under decriminalised parking laws. Unfortunately PPCs also call their invoices Parking Charge Notices, as they also cannot call them Penalty Charge Notices.

 

The OP needs to establish if the notice was issued on behalf of the railway company under byelaw 14 and deal with it if it was, rather than assume it is a PPC invoice and ignoring it, and ending up with a summons.

 

PPCs cannot issue penalties which is why they cannot issue Penalty Charge Notices, Railway Operators can however issue penalties so in theory can issue a penalty charge notice the term is not copyrighted to Councils.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Stand back a little and assess.

 

A real byelaw ticket is indeed a penalty and will be called a penalty.

A TRO is just byelaw don't forget.

 

Every set Railway Byelaws I have seen make the Owner responsible. yet this 'thing' has the usual PPC and council PCN text of "Owner'Keeper/Hirer" .

For example for Northwestern it says

In England and Wales

(i) The owner of any motor vehicle, bicycle or other conveyance used, left or placed in breach of Byelaw 14(1) to 14(3) may be liable to pay a penalty as displayed in that area.

 

Suspect ? Yes, very probably.

 

No Set of Bylealws I have read allow them to add increased fees. You pay what the amount it says in the byelaws or it goes to magistrate's court. Looks like this lot have added an amount. Suspect ? Very.

 

They are claiming it as a debt but they are a third party. as it hasn't been to Magistrate's court there is as yet no 'debt'.

Suspect ? very very.

 

No letter of assignment as been received (Law of Property Act). Suspect. Yes. But then they never get issued by powerless DCAs.

 

The do not name the Byelaw !! (just mention Section 14 - of what. How can you check ?

 

Suspect ? Yes.

 

 

I can't see that they have any statutory right to the £165 they claim.

 

Its either a clear Fraud - or a crap company that sends out crap paper.

 

I don't see how they can claim the £165 or why anyone should pay them and the Railway Company if this is a genuine Byelaw ticket.

 

need to see the 'PCN', pictures of the signs etc at the station.

and it would be advisable to dig out the actual byelaw for that station/railway company IF it exists.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Section 14? Section 14?

 

Where have I just read this?

 

Oh yes, in the thread titled

Meteor / Orpington / I'm actually in the wrong - what to do?

 

Is this the same thing being "tried on" by another lot, do you think?

 

Sam


All of these are on behalf of a friend.. Cabot - [There's no CCA!]

CapQuest - [There's no CCA!]

Barclays - Zinc, [There's no CCA!]

Robinson Way - Written off!

NatWest - Written off!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the replies so far.

 

If you look at the bottom of the letter it says "London and South Eastern railway trading as DPS"

 

What does that mean in this case? Because it looks like the actual rail company is chasing it? Or not?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...