Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • From what I can gather, which may be wrong or incomplete   The saliva test is supposed to be cheaper, easier and quicker to implement and check than the swab tests (projected at $10 in USA) BUT only effectively tests for infection in the upper respiratory tract - ie is readily spreadable by coughs and sneezes etc hence only 'validly flags people as 'not currently spreading via coughs and sneezes and only that for a limited time - perhaps a day tops.   Not sure how its supposed to check whether people are 'sweating' it out although it does seem likely that if people are sweating it - they would have it in the upper respiratory tracts - seems a reasonable assumption to me as a 'none virologist' . I'm not sure how certain it is that upper tract infections are the first - although it does seem likely in many or perhaps most cases   Not really how it was originally 'sold' - but nothing new with that It likely it uses relatively portable testing machines to test locally rather than send them off as in the reports of the 'Southampton' tests   https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-saliva-test-for-coronavirus-piloted-in-southampton https://health.usnews.com/wellness/articles/what-to-know-about-new-saliva-tests-for-covid-19 https://heavy.com/news/2020/08/covid-19-saliva-test/ https://kstp.com/coronavirus/mdh-covid-19-briefing-fall-sports-changes-first-saliva-testing-sit-to-open-/5869458/ https://www.latimes.com/science/story/2020-08-31/covid-tests-with-saliva-are-comparable-to-nasal-swab-tests   As for charging everyone for it .. Just another way of taxing the NHS/care industry who along with schools and shop staff (IMO) would benefit the nation/community most by having it - other than that it just largely seems to be enabling the wealthy to bypass restrictions have their days out grousing and stag'ing .. as Dodo told the CBI “For that sort of test that may be a normal cost of doing business to be able to have non-socially distanced activities, but that’s different than for symptomatic people who should always feel like they can come to an NHS service.”  
    • Particulars of claim  1) The claim comprises the following  Agreements the defendant entered into: a. EDF energy customer plc  with reference 671061193309 and current balance of £124.47 b. Capital one (Europe) plc with reference 5460978463392406 and current balance £194.97  The agreements were terminated as payments were not maintained  and subsequently assigned to the claimant  And the claimant claims: a)The total of the said sums being £319.44 b) Interest pursuant to s69 county court act 1984 at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue, but limited to one year, being £25.56 c) costs    Issue date: 07 September 2020   Name of Claimant: Lowell
    • Includes eligibility, appeals, tax credits and Universal Credit View the full article
    • By the way, I'm curious. Would the parcel shop have known what was in the parcel? Was it clear from the wrapping or did you have to tell them what it was before they gave you the receipt?
    • Well precedents aren't set at County Court level – but it would still be a useful piece of persuasion for further cases – and dissuasion for Hermes. However it won't come to that – and they will settle  
  • Our picks

    • @curryspcworld @TeamKnowhowUK - Samsung 75 8K TV - completely broken by Currys. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/426151-samsung-75-8k-tv-completely-broken-by-currys/&do=findComment&comment=5069075
      • 4 replies
    • @skinnyfoodco Skinny Foods. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/426130-skinny-foods/&do=findComment&comment=5068996
      • 8 replies
    • I’m in desperate need of help
       
      I bought some clothes online in may through Evans and paid through PayPal
      returned them all seven days later
       
      I waited the 14days for my refund and no refund came
      I put in a dispute through PayPal but I didn’t get any emails to escalate the case - PayPal closed it. 
      evans said they couldn’t refund the money because PayPal have cancelled the refund because of the open dispute
       
      I contacted PayPal
      they said the dispute had been closed but Evans at no point had attempted a refund.
      fast forward to today
       
      I’ve got copies of numerous messages sent to and from twitter messages as it’s the only way I can contact them
      I’ve also contacted their customer service too
      all I get is PayPal have cancelled refund because dispute is still open.
       
      I have proved that the dispute is closed
      I have got an email saying that if Evans sent the refund they would accept it
      but up until the date I got the email they have not once attempted a refund .
       
       I have sent them a letter before court email
      I have even offered to have the full refund as a gift card just to get this sorted !
       
      I’m literally at the end of my tether and don’t know where to turn next !
       
      i suffer with mental health issues and this is affecting my health and I’d saved the money for a year to buy these clothes as I’m on a low income .
    • In desperate need of help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/425244-in-desperate-need-of-help/&do=findComment&comment=5067040
      • 29 replies

Assured Shorthold Tenancy - notice of termination


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 3683 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

My Assured Shorthold Tenancy agreement states:

 

"The Tenant Agrees that if this AST agreement is not renewed at end of six months term it shall continue on the basis of a statutory periodic tenancy upon the same terms except that the rent shall be increased in line with inflation until either two months notice of termination is served by the Landlord or one month notice is served in writing by the Tenant".

 

My original contract expired in March, so I am guessing it now continues as a statutory periodic tenancy. My landlord contacted us back in spring regarding the rent increase, but after negotiation, he agreed not to increase the rent.

 

Now, the landlord wants me to move out. I insist that, according to the contract, he needs to give me two months notice. But he says it is only one month and if I want a two-month notice I will need to pay him extra rent for the last previous months (as if the term of notice was based on rent increase). Can he do that?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome to the site. With Assured Tenancies and Assured Shorthold Tenancies the tenant and landlord are required to agree on the rent at the start of the tenancy.

With an Assured Tenancy the rent must remain at the agreed rate until the end of the fixed term, unless the landlord and tenant agree to change it or rent changes are stated in the agreement.

At the end of the fixed term of an Assured Tenancy the rent can be increased, provided:

 

  • The tenancy agreement has guidelines for rent increases
  • The landlord gives written notice of the intended increase
  • The landlord gives written notice of a change to the terms of the tenancy

The landlord is required to give the tenant notice of at least one rental period, which is usually one month, before increasing the rent. If the tenant challenges the increase in rent this will not threaten their ability to remain in the property, unless the landlord has other grounds on which they may evict the tenant.

With an Assured Shorthold Tenancy, the landlord may choose to increase the rent when the agreement is renewed after the initial period. If the tenant does not agree to the rent increase, the landlord may choose to evict the tenant rather than forego the required rent increase. If the tenant wishes to remain in the property, it is often the case that they agree to the rent increase.

Both Assured Tenancies and Assured Shorthold Tenancies enable the tenant to refer excessively high rents to the Rent Assessment Committee during the first six months of the tenancy. The Rent Assessment Committee is independent of both local and central government and usually consists of three people: a lawyer, a property valuer and a lay person.

The aim of the committee is to decide on a reasonable market rent for the property being let. The rent charged for similar properties in the area let on Assured Tenancies and Assured Shorthold Tenancies will be analysed to enable the committee to reach a decision. The market rent set by the committee will then be the highest legal rate the landlord can charge.

There are six rent assessment panels in England and Wales. No fees are charged for asking the committee to set a market rent for a property.

Edited by MARTIN3030
Typo

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, that does not exactly answer my question. The rent increase is not a factor here, since there was not any - after our fixed term agreement became a statutory periodic tenancy the landlord agreed not to increase the rent for another 12 months.

Now, because he has moved abroad, he wants to give the flat to an agency to manage, and he wants us to leave. He insists that he has a right to give us one month notice. But the above clause from our agreement says it should be a two-month notice, am I right? Also I googled the Housing Act and I am thinking it qualifies under section 21 notice to quit, which has to be served two months before the leaving date? I just need somebody to confirm if I am reasoning correctly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes you are right, he does have to give you two months notice by law

He's taking the proverbial mate

I QUESTION THEREFORE I AM!! [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Unfortunately i'm not an expert in any given field legally and my advice and that of the Consumer Action Group and the Bank Action Group is given without prejudice and without liability so please if in any doubt whatsoever seek help from an insured qualified professional. Contents of my posts are purely my own personal opinions and not condoned or endorsed in any way, shape or form by CAG. Thank you! :p

 

 

I have been smoke-free for 4yrs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its quite simple. A monthly AST, whether stat or periodic, or contractual, needs to have a full 2 months notice given to terminate it by the landlord, to end at the end of a rental period.

 

CG above is dead right.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice to see you again Sheddy

I QUESTION THEREFORE I AM!! [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Unfortunately i'm not an expert in any given field legally and my advice and that of the Consumer Action Group and the Bank Action Group is given without prejudice and without liability so please if in any doubt whatsoever seek help from an insured qualified professional. Contents of my posts are purely my own personal opinions and not condoned or endorsed in any way, shape or form by CAG. Thank you! :p

 

 

I have been smoke-free for 4yrs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers CG, and you :D

 

Keep getting too busy for the site (for months on end) and it always draws me back :)

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know what you mean lol, i'm the same! :)

How are you getting on with this upgrade?, not keen myself but never mind

I QUESTION THEREFORE I AM!! [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Unfortunately i'm not an expert in any given field legally and my advice and that of the Consumer Action Group and the Bank Action Group is given without prejudice and without liability so please if in any doubt whatsoever seek help from an insured qualified professional. Contents of my posts are purely my own personal opinions and not condoned or endorsed in any way, shape or form by CAG. Thank you! :p

 

 

I have been smoke-free for 4yrs

Link to post
Share on other sites

If your goal is to stay in the flat as long as possible, do the following:

 

Do not argue with the L about notice period and do not give him any legal advise. Once L issues section 21 notice, show it to someone qualified together with your lease. Tenant Relations Officer (TRO) of your local concil would be a perfect person to run it by, they are usually very helpful and knowlegeable. If the notice is invalid, which is very likely, ignore it. Should L start possession action inform the court that no valid section 21 notice was issued and request the hearing, TRO's and Shelter will help you with that.

 

For section 21 notice to be valid it must at least have date of expiry exactly on the last day of your fixed term or monthly anniversary of it which is two month or more from the date of service of the notice.

 

Assuming AST with private landlord and monthly payments without rent arrears of more than 8 weeks, invalid section 21 notice if you play it right means that you probably can stay in your house for another 4-5 month (depends on how quickly L learns how to issue correct section 21 notice).

 

Basically, if L wants you out you will have to move out eventually, but if L does not do what needs to be done by law to the letter your move may be postponed for quite some time.

--------------------------------------------------

Yorkshire Bank ~1200£ of charges reclaimed many moons ago, settled out of court

HSBC ~350£ of charges reclaimed many moons ago, settled out of court

HSBC ~4000£ flexiloan CCA request sent May 2009, 'sorry, we do not have your CCA' letter received June 2009, AccountInDispute letter sent.

HSBC ~9000£ CC CCA request sent May 2009, no response, AccountInDispute letter sent.

HSBC - preliminary letter for about 300£ of unfair charges plus interest sent May 2009, LBA sent June 2009, N1 POC and Schedule of charges submitted July 2009

Egg - CCA, SAR, "no more calls" letter, DMP offer sent July 2009. Got a DN from Egg - wont say a word on this one until court papers are received.

Link to post
Share on other sites

For section 21 notice to be valid it must at least have date of expiry exactly on the last day of your fixed term or monthly anniversary of it which is two month or more from the date of service of the notice.

 

Not quite right, a s.21 b notice must expire after the end of the fixed term (any point after the end) but not on the last day of the fixed term, otherwise it will be invalid.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Not quite right, a s.21 b notice must expire after the end of the fixed term (any point after the end) but not on the last day of the fixed term, otherwise it will be invalid.

 

It would be great if you are correct and I am wrong. I'll double check it. Thanks.

--------------------------------------------------

Yorkshire Bank ~1200£ of charges reclaimed many moons ago, settled out of court

HSBC ~350£ of charges reclaimed many moons ago, settled out of court

HSBC ~4000£ flexiloan CCA request sent May 2009, 'sorry, we do not have your CCA' letter received June 2009, AccountInDispute letter sent.

HSBC ~9000£ CC CCA request sent May 2009, no response, AccountInDispute letter sent.

HSBC - preliminary letter for about 300£ of unfair charges plus interest sent May 2009, LBA sent June 2009, N1 POC and Schedule of charges submitted July 2009

Egg - CCA, SAR, "no more calls" letter, DMP offer sent July 2009. Got a DN from Egg - wont say a word on this one until court papers are received.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...