Jump to content

Falkirk1298

Hostilities Commenced with the Bank of Scotland

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 4750 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

I have sent my frst letter to the Bank of Scotland about their charges, and am awaiting a reply.

 

To add some background, a few years ago my wife got herself into serious financial difficulties through personal loans and both the Bank of Scotland and the Royal Bank offering further loans to "help". The upshot is that we are now seperated and I have signed over my half of the matrimonial home to allow her to remortgage and clear at least some of her debt. Because so much of my income at that time was needed to cover her payments, other things were delayed and the charges on my account built up.

 

I can identify about £1100 in charges from my on-line statements and archived documents but there is much more.

 

I will be writing to ask for a full schedule of charges but in the meantime I intend to take what I can idfentify and split it into smaller amounts, then raise an action for each of the smaller amounts on a regular basis. I am in the fortunate position of not being desperate for the money, so I'm thinking about something along the lines of £200 every 2 weeks.

 

I wonder how they'll react to that??

 

J

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the text of my initial letter to the Bank of Scotland. The text of a BoS overdraft charge letter can be found elsewhere in this thread.

 

*************

 

Bank of Scotland

XXXXXXX

XXXXXXX

XXXXXXX

 

2 February 2006

 

Dear Sirs,

 

ACCOUNT NO XXXXXXXX SORT CODE XX-XX-XX

 

Attached herewith is a copy of a letter I recently received through your Internet Banking service. This letter raises some issues which I would be grateful if you would clarify for me.

 

First of all, I note the author of the letter states that charge has been levied on my account “To cover our costs”. I have no issue at all with the bank recovering the actual costs of this transaction, provided these costs can be justified. I would therefore be grateful if you could supply me with a detailed breakdown of the costs to the bank generated by this transaction which justify a charge of £30. I’m sure that, as a banking professional, you do not need me to define the differences between liquidated damages and penalty charges. At the moment, I am of the opinion that this charge is in fact a penalty charge and look forward to seeing your detailed response.

 

My second point concerns the phrase “We will take this money from your account seven days from the date of this letter”. This appears to be a breach of the Banking Code, section 5.5 of the March 2005 edition of which states:

 

Before we take interest or charges for standard

account services from your current or savings

account, we will give you at least 14 days’ notice of

how much we will take.

 

I am aware that the code is voluntary but I am also aware that you subscribe to it. I would therefore be grateful if you could clarify the bank’s position on this.

 

My final question concerns the phrase “If this causes you to have an unauthorised overdraft, we will also charge you interest at the unauthorised rate, and a monthly unauthorised overdraft fee of £28*.” I would be grateful if you could tell me if this is also a charge to cover costs and, if it is, how these charges are calculated. Once again I am of the opinion that this charge is in fact a penalty charge and look forward to seeing your detailed rebuttal of my view.

 

I am sure I cannot be the first person to raise these questions with you, so I look forward to your swift response.

 

Yours faithfully,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest stephen

As to you asking for a break down of cost

 

 

Here is the reply you will get

 

Sorry that is commercially sensitive information!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

they will not say that, they will answer all your other question by circling about t&c s etc...... However please put a letter up if they say they do not want to disclose the amount it costs them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
As to you asking for a break down of cost

 

 

Here is the reply you will get

 

Sorry that is commercially sensitive information!

 

That's why I asked the question! :D

 

I'll then tell them that if we get as far as the Sheriff, I'll insist they reveal it anyway. Just another way of keeping the pressure up.

 

J

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, no response at all from the bank, so this follow up letter will be hand delivered to my branch tomorrow. Any comments?

 

John

 

********

 

Bank of Scotland

*******

*******

*******

 

16th February 2006

 

Dear Sirs,

 

ACCOUNT NO ******* SORT CODE *******

 

It is with regret that I note you have not replied to my letter of 2nd February, a copy of which is attached.

 

In light of your reluctance to address the points I raised in that letter, it is my intention to challenge the various charges levied on this account, beginning with those noted below:

 

1. Charge of £28.00 notified in letter dated ******* and deducted on *******

2. Charge of £28.00 notified in letter dated ******* and deducted on *******

3. Charge of £28.00 notified in letter dated ******* and deducted on *******

4. Charge of £28.00 notified in letter dated ******* and deducted on *******

5. Charge of £28.00 notified in letter dated ******* and deducted on *******

6. Charge of £28.00 notified in letter dated ******* and deducted on *******

7. Charge of £28.00 notified in letter dated ******* and deducted on *******

 

This represents a total of £196.

 

I have identified these charges in particular as they appear to be nothing more than charges for having had charges, and I am of the view that your charges represent a penalty and are therefore irrecoverable at common law. In the Scottish case of Castaneda and Others v. Clydebank Engineering and Shipbuilding Co., Ltd. (1904) 12 SLT 498, the House of Lords held that a contractual party can only recover damages for actual or liquidated losses incurred from a breach of contract. This is also the position in English law: Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v New Garage and Motor Co Ltd [1915] AC 79.

 

In addition, I would note that these charges appear to represent an unfair term of contract which is contrary to the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 (SI. 1999/2083). My account falls within the ambit of Regulation 5 of the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 as I am a consumer. Your charges constitute an unfair penalty under reference to paragraph 1(e) of schedule 2 of the said regulations:

 

‘Indicative and non-exhaustive list of terms which may be regarded as unfair -

1. Terms which have the object of effect of - (e) requiring any consumer who

fails his obligation to pay a disproportionately high sum in compensation’.

 

0n 26 July 2005 the OFT stated that 'a charge is likely to be disproportionately high if it is more than a court would be likely to award if the lender sued for breach of contract'. I believe that your charges require me to pay a disproportionately high sum in compensation for being overdrawn without mutual agreement.

 

I am aware that these charges are detailed in your Terms and Conditions. However I would point out that these Terms and Conditions are in turn bound by law, and it is my contention that, for the reasons detailed above, your current charges breach the laws outlined above.

 

I therefore ask that the identified charges be repaid to my account within 5 working days from the date of this letter. Should they not be repaid, I will launch a small claims action to recover these charges without further notice. The further charge of £28, notified in the letter dated ******* and due for deduction on ******* will also be met by a small claims summons if it is in fact deducted.

 

It is my intention to challenge all such charges levied on this account since it was opened. I therefore request that I be supplied with all information relating to charges deducted from this account under the terms of the 1998 Data Protection Act. I authorise you to deduct the £10 DPA fee from this account. As you may be aware, bank account information was deemed to come under the DPA by the Court of Appeal in the case of Durant v Financial Services Authority [2003] EWCA Civ 1746.

 

Please note that I am not questioning the bank’s right to make some charge for transgressions, and for this reason I am making no claim on the interest added to unauthorised overdrafts. However, I understand that I would be entitled to add 8% APR to each charge should this dispute reach the Small Claims Court. That would add an extra £7.35.

 

I would also ask you to note that I make no criticism, either implicit or explicit, of the bank’s branch or customer services staff who I have always found to be excellent people. My dispute is with much higher levels of bank management, who appear to be operating a very cynical, legally and ethically questionable profit maximisation scheme at the expense of their customers.

 

Yours Faithfully,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Far too nice but it will do :twisted:

 

However, I do think that where the charges have put you into overdraft then you should be recovering the interest that they levied on that overdraft as well particularly if has been charged at the unautorised borrowing rate. This feature is in fact an aggravated penalty and quite unacceptable.


Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Been a bit disengaged recently for domestic reasons, but time for an update!

 

Received a letter from the BoS apologising for not having replied to my letter of 2nd February and saying they will look into my complaint. However, they did deduct the £28 charge at the end of February which I told them would result in a claim against them if they proceeded with it, so on March 22 I sent the following to them:

 

“Further to my letters dated 2nd February and 16th February, I am writing to inform you that it is my intention to raise a small claims action at ***** Sheriff Court to recover the amounts outlined in the attached spreadsheet. The amount includes the charge of £28 notified in your letter to me dated 19th January and deducted from my account on 28th February, which I made clear in my letter of 16th February would be met with a small claims summons. I assume that, since the charge was deducted, you are content for this small claims action to go ahead. My grounds for taking this action are outlined in my previous letters.

 

I also note with regret that you have thus far failed to respond to my enquiry concerning the levying of charges and the Banking Code, which was contained in my letter of 2nd February.

 

Please note that, once again, I make no criticism either implicit or explicit of the bank’s branch or customer services staff who I have always found to be very good indeed. My dispute is with much higher levels of bank management”

 

Total claim is £224 plus interest. There will be more to follow!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've had a response to the letter qouted in the post above:

 

"Bank of Scotland

Customer Relations

PO Box 548

Leeds

LS1 1WU

 

Tel 01422 333 456

Fax 0845 1281385

 

 

Dear *****

 

Thank you for your letter

 

I am sorry to learn of your concerns regarding charges that have been applied to your account.

 

We're keen to deal with your concerns as quickly as possible. A Customer Relations Manager will investigate the points you have raised and you will recieve a reply shortyly, but certainly no later than 4 weeks.

 

You will find enclosed a copy of our leaflet, which tells you how we will handle your complaint.

 

Your concerns will be dealt with as quickly as possible, but to help us deal more efficiently with your enquiry, please quote ************* when writing or telephoning the number at the top of this letter.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

Lindsay Gibson

Customer Services Manager

Customer Services"

 

Thats as far as we've got since the 2nd of February, a computer generated letter!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not realloy part of my bigger claim but on Wednesday I checked my internet banking, and was horrified to discover that the BoS had bounced a cheque, in spite of me making sure there was enough cash in the account to cover the amount.

 

I phoned them up.

 

"There wasn't enough money in you account, Mr Falkirk."

 

"Yes there was, and I can prove it because it says here on the screen in front of me that the balance was almost double what was needed to cover the cheque."

 

"Yes, but there were pending debit card transactions which would have put you over the limit."

 

"Rubbish, and I even deposited extra cash to make sure we wouldn't be here."

 

"I'ts your responsbility to ensure there's enough cash in you account."

 

"I did, and there was."

 

Eventually I got the £39 refunded, "because I hadn't had any charges refunded recently."

 

Not yet, brothers, not yet!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This topic was closed on 03/05/19.

If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support their.

If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened.

- Consumer Action Group

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 4750 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you
Please fill in your quit date here
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?




  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • This is a bit of a lengthy one but I’ll summerise best as possible.
       
      THIS IS HOW THE PHONECALL WENT 
       
      I was contacted by future comms by phone, they stated that they could beat any phone contract I have , (I am a limited company but just myself that needs a business phone and I am the only worker) 
      I told future comms my deal, £110 per month with a phone and a virtual landline, they confirmed that they could beat that, £90 per month with a phone , virtual landline  they also confirmed they would pay Vodafone (previous provider) the termination fee. As I am in business, naturally I was open to making a deal. So we proceeded. 
      Future comms then revealed that the contract would be with PLAN.COM and the airtime would be provided by 02, I instantly told them that this would break the deal as I have poor 02 signal in the house where I live as my partner is on 02 and constantly complaining about bad signal
      the salesman assured me he would send a signal booster box out with the phone so I would have perfect signal.
      so far so good.....
      i then explained this is the only mobile phone I use for business and pleasure, so therefore I didn’t want any disconnection time in the slightest between the switchover from Vodafone to 02
      the salesman then confirmed that the existing phone would only be disconnected once the new phone was switched on.
      so far so good....
      • 14 replies
    • A shocking story of domestic and economic abuse compounded by @BarclaysUKHelp ‏ bank complicity – coming soon @A_Gentle_Woman. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/415737-a-shocking-story-of-domestic-and-economic-abuse-compounded-by-barclaysukhelp-%E2%80%8F-bank-complicity-%E2%80%93-coming-soon-a_gentle_woman/
      • 0 replies
    • The FSA has announced large fines against DB UK Bank Limited (trading as DB Mortgages) - DeutscheBank and also against Redstone for their unfair treatment of their customers.
      Please see the links below for summaries and full details from the FSA website.
      It is now completely clear that any arrears charges which exceed actual administrative costs are unfair and therefore unlawful.
      Furthemore, irresponsible lending practices are also unfair and unlawful.
      Additionally there are other unfair practices including unarranged counsellor visits - even if they have been attempted.
      You are entitled to refuse counsellor visits and not incur any charges.
      Any charges for counsellor visits must not seek to make profits. The cost of the visits must be passed on to you at cost price.
      We are hearing stories of people being charged for counsellor visits for which there is no evidence that they were even attempted.
      It is clear that some mortgage lenders are trying to cheat you out of your money.
      You should ascertain how much has been taken from you and claim it back. The chances of winning are better than 90%. It is highly likely that the lender will attempt to avoid court action and offer you back your money.
      However, you should ensure that you receive a proper rate of interest and this means that you should be seeking at least restitutionary damages - which would be much higher than the statutory 8%.
      Furthermore, you should assess whether the paying of demands for unlawful excessive charges has also out you further into arrears and if this has caused you further penalties in terms of extra interest or any other prejudice. This should be claimed as well.
      If excessive unlawful charges have resulted in your credit file being affected, then you should take this into account also when working out exactly what you want by way of remedy from the lender.
      You should consult others on these forums when considering any offer.
      You must not make any complaint through the Ombudsman. your time will be wasted, you will wait up to 2 yrs and there will be a minimal 8% award of interest and no account will be taken of any other damage you have suffered.
      You must make your complaint through the County Court for a rapid and effective remedy.

      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Library/Communication/PR/2010/120.shtml
      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/redstone.pdf
      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/db_uk.pdf
       
      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/consumerinformation/firmnews/2011/db_mortgages.shtml
      Do you have a mortage arears claim to make? Then post your story on the forum here
        • Like
      • 0 replies
    • 30 Day Right To Reject - Vehicle Casualty Report. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/415585-30-day-right-to-reject-vehicle-casualty-report/
      • 57 replies
×
×
  • Create New...