Jump to content
  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Can you ask your GP to get a second opinion on the NHS?  (I ought to know because I'm a retired NHS manager, but worked in mental health where x-rays didn't really feature very much(!).)   Your GP may be reluctant for various reasons but you've got nothing to lose by asking.  Might be difficult if there's only one consultant in that specialty locally.   If that is a non-starter, you could ask your GP for a private referral if any of the relevant specialists run private clinics.  Your son'll get seen quicker and an initial private consultation shouldn't cost more than about a couple of hundred quid.  Then take it from there.   (Emphasise to your GP what your real concerns are and why you have them - even if it's just "I looked it up on the internet and it looks like this which can lead to serious complications.  What do you think?  I'm really worried...")   EDIT:  Just looked on my local NHS Clinical Commissioning Group website and searched for "second opinion" but nothing comes up...  I thought you were entitled to one - you'll have to ask your GP.  Or look on your own CCG site.  Oh - despite being a NHS manager I have paid to see a consultant privately.  £150 well spent - if you can afford it... which I appreciate not everyone can.
    • dont think they are even allowed to offer settlement by instalments, they are not creditors.   read the letter carefully and understand what it doesn't actually say....like the word WILL anywhere.   they,  a DCA, can't recommend anything and their client most certainly wouldn't have disclosed anything to a powerless DCA about what their solicitors might or might not have said to them. and ofcourse a solicitor is in no position whatsoever to suggest to their client they get back to the DCA and tell the DCA to tell you their client will accept instalments!   the letter is a load of ole BS that is concocted by the dca without any input or knowledge of their client nor their clients solicitor...   dx      
    • The paediatric orthopaedic consultant at the fracture clinic told us today that he believes it is just a sprain behind the knee. I'm concerned my GP will say something along the lines of, 'you have seen a consultant, he says it will heal in 2 to 3 weeks, you don't know more than him!', or something like that. It's just that I believe I can clearly see a fracture. And as there was no fall or hard knock, only a very tightly streched knee bending at an angle behind, with a load. I figured that the temdon must have pulled some bone up. And thats the injury I found online. I totally take on board what you are saying. You are correct. I guess I'll see what my GP says tomorrow, hopefully she allows me to email the images, if she doesent have access to them already. Thanks again
    • With the global market for recycled cardboard worth billions of dollars, it is attracting criminals. View the full article
    • UK house prices are predicted to fall but a report spells out why property may remain out of reach. View the full article
  • Our picks

    • Curry’s cancelled my order but took the money anyway. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/423055-curry%E2%80%99s-cancelled-my-order-but-took-the-money-anyway/
      • 11 replies
    • Father passed away - Ardent Credit Services (Vodafone) now claiming he owes money. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/423040-father-passed-away-ardent-credit-services-vodafone-now-claiming-he-owes-money/
      • 9 replies
    • Currys Refuse Refund F/Freezer 5day old. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422656-currys-refuse-refund-ffreezer-5day-old/
      • 6 replies
    • Hi,  
      I was in Sainsbury’s today and did scan and shop.
      I arrived in after a busy day at work and immediately got distracted by the clothes.
      I put a few things in my trolley and then did a shop.
      I paid and was about to get into my car when the security guard stopped me and asked me to come back in.
      I did and they took me upstairs.
      I was mortified and said I forgot to scan the clothes and a conditioner, 5 items.
      I know its unacceptable but I was distracted and Initially hadn’t really planned to use scan and shop.
      No excuse.
      I offered to pay for the goods but the manager said it was too late.
      He looked at the CCTV and because I didn’t try to scan the items he was phoning the police.
      The cost of the items was about £40.
      I was crying at this point and told them I was a nurse, just coming from work and I could get struck off.
      They rang the police anyway and they came and issued me with a community resolution notice, which goes off my record in a year.
      I feel terrible. I have to declare this to my employer and NMC.
      They kept me in a room on my own with 4 staff and have banned me from all stores.
      The police said if I didn’t do the community order I would go to court and they would refer me to the PPS.
      I’m so stressed,
      can u appeal this or should I just accept it?
      Thanks for reading 
      • 16 replies

CCA 1974 ss176 (Service of Documents)/189 (Definitions)

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 3653 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

These were going to be introduced by the opposition at my hearing today.


Does this 'blow out of the water' :( all that has gone before with regards to Service of Documents, Calculating 14 Clear Days, etc.?


All comments welcome.



Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Costa

I believe they are trying to say that by posting the DN they have ' served it' see the bit in red So they are trying to say that as soon as the DN was posted it was served so then they have extra remedy days


But section 176 also mentions the Interpretation Act see blue

I have seen this argument about service put forward in other cases but I believe the CCA 1974 is subject to the Interpretation act so those service rules should apply.


I hope you get some more input from the more legally minded :-)





Part XII Service of documents





176. Service of documents


(1) A document to be served under this Act by one person

('the server') on another person ('the subject') is to be

treated as propery served on the subject if dealt with as

mentioned in the following subsections.

(2) The document may be delivered or sent by post to the

subject, or addressed to him by name and left at his proper


(3) For the purposes of this Act, a document sent by post

to, or left at, the address last known to the server as the

address of a person shall be treated as sent by post to, or

left at, his proper address.

(4) Where the document is to be served on the subject as

being the person having any interest in land, and is not

practicable after reasonable inquiry to ascertain the

subject's name or address, the document may be served by-

(a) addressing it to the subject by the description of the

person having that interest in the land (naming it), and

(b) delivering the document to some responsible person on

the land or affixing it, or a copy of it, in a conspicuous

position on the land.

(5) Where a document to be served on the subject as being

a debtor, hirer or surety, or as having any other capacity

relevant for the purposes of this Act, is served at any

time on another person who-

(a) is the person last known to the server as having that

capacity, but

(b) before that time had ceased to have it, the document

shall be treated as having been served at that time on the


(6) Anything done to a document in relation to a person who

(whether to the knowledge of the server or not) has died

shall be treated for the purposes of sub-section (5) as

service of the document on that person if it would have

been so treated had he not died.

(7) Neither of the following enactments (which provide for

the vesting of the estate of an intestate in the Probate

Judge) shall be construed as authorising service on the

Probate Judge of any document which is to be served under

this Act-

section 9 of the Administration of Estates Act 1925;

section 3 of the Administration of Estates Act (Northern

Ireland) 1955.

(8) References in the preceding subsections to the serving

of a document on a person include the giving of the

document to that person.


Commencement 31 July 1974 (see Sch 3, note).

General effect

The section makes general provision relating to the service of

documents under this Act. Compliance with this section means

that a statutory notice will have been duly 'served' on 'the

subject' for the purposes of the Act. The section is not

exhaustive, however, in the sense that 'proper service' does

not, per se, constitute effective service; for example, a notice

of withdrawal under s 57 or of rescission under s 102 will be

properly served if posted to a 'subject' specified in those

sections, but it does not follow that the notice thereupon takes

effect (see note to sub-s (2), below). Serve, served, service To

'serve on' means, for the purposes of the Act, to deliver, or

send by post, to the subject: see s 189(1). 'Delivery' includes

personal delivery, and references to 'serving' a document

therefore include giving the document to the subject: sub-s (8).

Person See note to s 7 Sent by post The effect of sub-s (2) is

that provisions of this Act which require or authorise service

of a document also authorise the service of that document by

post, bringing into operation the Interpretation Act 1978 s 7

(48 Halsbury's Statutes (3rd Edn) 1300) by which service is

deemed to be effected by properly addressing, prepaying and

posting a letter containing the document.

Unless the contrary is proved, service will be deemed to have

been effected at the time when the letter would be delivered in

the ordinary course of post This provision will, accordingly,

govern the efficacy of posted notices served under this Act

except where it is excluded: see s 69(7). For decisions on the

Interpretation Act 1889, s 26 which was to a similar effect as

s 7 of the 1978 Act, see Sharpley v Manby [1942]1 KB 217,

[1942]1 All ER 66; Sandland v Neale [1956]1 QB 214, [1955] 3 All

ER 571; R v County of London Quarter Sessions Appeals Committee,

ex p Rossi [1956] 1 QB 682, [1956] 1 All ER 670; Beer v Davies

[1958]2QB 187; Stylo Shoes Ltd V Prices Tailors Ltd[1960]Ch396,

[ 1959] 3 All ER 901; Moody v Godstone RDC [ 1966] 2 All ER 696,

[ 1966] I WLR 1085; White v Weston [1968] 2 QB 647, [1968] 2 All

ER 842; Cooper v Scott-Farnell [1969] 1 AII ER I 781 , [1969]1

WLR 120; Hewitt v Leicester City Council [1969] 2 All ER 802,

[1969] I WLR 855; Maltglade Ltd v St Albans RDC [1972] 3 All ER

129, [1972] I WLR 1230; Saga of Bond Street Ltd v Avalon

Promotions Ltd [1972] 2 QB 325n; [1972] 2 AII ER 545n; A/S

Cathrineholm v Norequipment Trading Ltd [1972] 2 QB 314; Thomas

Bishop Ltd v Helmville Ltd [1972] I QB 464, [1972] 1 All ER 365;

Migwain Ltd (in liquidation) v Transport and General Worker's

Union [1979] ICR 597.

Interest in land See the note 'Land' to s 189(1) A person who

has died The effect of sub-s (5) is to facilitate service of a

notice by service to the subject's address in the normal way

even though he has (whether to the server's knowledge or not)

died intestate and, at the time of service, no letters of

administration have been granted Aministration of Estates Act

1925, s 9 See 13 Halsbury's Statutes (3rd Edn) 46 Administration

of Estates Act (Northern Ireland) 1955 1955 c 24 (Nl)

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?

  • Create New...