Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. Could you post up what they've sent please so we can see what the charge is? Cover up your name and address and their reference number. HB
    • I've looked through all our old NPE threads, and as far as we know they have never had the bottle to do court. There are no guarantees of course, but when it comes to put or shut up they definitely tend towards shut up. How about something like -   Dear Jonathan and Julie, Re: PCN no.XXXXX cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea that you actually expected me to take this tripe seriously and cough up. I'll write to you not some uninterested third party, thanks all the same, because you have are the ones trying to threaten me about this non-existent "debt". Go and look up Jopson v Homeguard Services Ltd, saddos.  Oh, while you're at it, go and look up your Subject Access Request obligations - we all know how you ballsed that up way back in January to March. Dear, dear, dear - you couldn't resist adding your £70 Unicorn Food Tax, you greedy gets.  Judges don't like these made-up charges, do they? You can either drop this foolishness now or get a hell of a hammering in court.  Both are fine with me.  Summer is coming up and I would love a holiday at your expense after claiming an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g). I look forward to your deafening silence.   That should show them you're not afraid of them and draw their attention to their having legal problems of their own with the SAR.  If they have any sense they'll crawl back under their stone and leave you in peace.  Over the next couple of days invest in a 2nd class stamp (all they are worth) and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
    • Okay please go through the disclosure very carefully. I suggest that you use the technique broadly in line with the advice we give on preparing your court bundle. You want to know what is there – but also very importantly you want to know what is not there. For instance, the email that they said they sent you before responding to the SAR – did you see that? Is there any trace of of the phone call that you made to the woman who didn't know anything about SAR's? On what basis was the £50 sent to you? Was it unilateral or did they offer it and you accepted it on some condition? When did they send you this £50 cheque? Have you banked it? Also, I think that we need to start understanding what you have lost here. Have you lost any money – and if so how much? Send the SAR to your bank as advised above
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Chloe v Virgin (MBNA)


chloebug75
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4982 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all, I have recently posted another thread regarding the debt that we owe but was advised to start a new thread for each CC. So here it is.

 

We have a Virgin CC, taken out in late 2005 and currently balance is 11800. Initially my husband called Virgin to discuss our financial problems and was told 'tough you got yourself into it we aren't prepared to help' ....nice! Since then we have drafted a letter and sent outlining our difficulties and asking for a reduction or freeze in interest (currently 35%) and a reduced payment plan. That letter was sent 26th July. Yesterday we received a reply saying that they could not help without further details and want us to send an SOA and telephone them. After reading threads here I understand we do not have to send an SOA and certainly not to call them so not sure what to do there yet....send another letter?

Anyway we also sent letter (template from this site) requesting the original CCA. Letter sent with £1, recorded delivery on 20th July. Guessing they are not outside the statutory time limit. However interestingly (or not) they have credited the £1 onto our account. I am thinking that this is not normal, the letter we sent clearly states that it is to be used for the purpose of the CCA and if they cannot supply it then they should return the £1. Am I right therefore in thinking that they are already in breach? and also if they have credited the £1 unlikely they have an agreement. Also to add the application for the card was completed online. It was not automatically approved but had to go for further authorisation (think at the time we had not long moved house), anyway they telephoned a few days later to ask about my husbands employment and said it was approved. Recieved card a couple of days after that, no agreement was sent and therefore not signed. Any input from anyone greatfully received. Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morning Chloe,

 

Firstly, I would be writing to them to demand that they remove the £1 payment added to your account as this restarts the Statute Barred clock. I know that doesn't matter at the moment, but it may at a later date.

If the 12+2 days have run out, send them the in dispute letter (if you need the link, shout)

 

Online applications after a certain date are acceptable but I can't remember when they became so.

 

If you want to maintain payments, send them what you can afford, not what the demand.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the application was made on-line in late 2005 then it would have only required a little tick as a signature.

 

However they are required to issue you with a copy of the agreement when the application is accepted.

 

If you haven't already done so I strongly recommend you send of a S.A.R letter as this will bring up lots of useful information.

Once you've got this you'll be able to get a better idea of your position.

 

Personally I wouldn't put too much reliance on the cca request as they don't tend to help too much (i.m.o).

Link to post
Share on other sites

It does help if you register with the CCCS or the Community Legal Advice people (or both) as they will negotiate (or try) with MBNA to accept a payment plan. MBNA will, as with me, probably reject all such approaches. But it does show a Judge that you are being pro-active in dealing with your debts and that MBNA are being their usual intransigent selves. I am presuming you own or have a share in a property? If yes it does explain MBNA's attitude as their sole intention is to go for a Charging Order on your assets in order to turn your unsecured debt into a secured one. Makes you wonder what happened to this current government's pledge to do away with charging orders on debts under £25,000!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks all for the advice. Wycombe yes we do own a property and in fact the first thing they suggested when we mentioned financial difficulties was taking a secured loan...however our house is currently in negative equity so doubt they'll get much that way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The very last thing you want to do is take out a secured loan to pay them off. Let them go through the rigmarole they usually go through to try and get a Charging Order.

 

However - I am wondering whether it may be to your advantage to point out to MBNA that you are in negative equity and there is little point in them chasing you through the system for a CO. With any luck they will then sell your debt on to some bottom feeder. But don't do this without further advice as I'm simply putting thought to paper here and have no idea if there are advantages to this or not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi I have received back our CCA (was 2 weeks past statutory time limit but never mind!!). I will scan it when I can but my scanner is playing up at the moment. Anyway as I explained before the application was made online with no decision made at the time, instead they called about 10 days later to offer the card. No further copy of the agreement was received afterwards just the card. Anyway I digress, looking at what they have sent there are about 4 pages in the first part with key financial information etc. It lists the percentage rate as APR rather than rate of interest. It does say how the payments will be allocatted. There is no credit limit- instead it says 'we will choose your credit limit and tell you what it is. We may vary it at any time and write to let you know' (the first we knew how much the limit was was when the card arrived. Anyway these details are all on the first page. The last page has none of the prescribed terms (don't know if it is supposed to for an online application?) and just 2 boxes, one which is the electronic signature tick box acceptance of terms and second box about ppi (which we did not take)

I know it is difficult to tell without seeing the agreement but what I am trying to find out is do they need to have the credit limit on the agreement or is it ok to just say 'we will decide what it will be' and also do the prescribed terms need to be on the signature page if it is an online application? Thanks for your help

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...