Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Try CPR 31.15 Possibly but a party is not compelled to disclose any documents pre allocation
    • Hi, I shown my key worker a letter that was sent to me saying that I owe £1200, she setup a standing order around 2021, this was to pay back money I owed, with my mental health status I have had complex issues to deal with and I just simply forgot about this standing order so it has been running for about 3.5 years acording to my key worker, anyway I'm not worried about the money that was sent that I call a overpayment, it went towards supporting my child's household so I am just happy with that, I am a little sad that I am being told I still owe this £1200, I have sent bank statements over 3 years worth but they have not taken away this £1200 bill and still say I owe it   Thank you
    • She did try contacting EON in the early days of the debt but they refused to speak to her because she could not pass the security checks. She didn't know the answers on an account she hadn't opened?   I also saw this article recently which could be what has happended here: Debt collection agencies in the UK are using fair means or foul to link people to an address where an unpaid debt has been run up, sometimes years after they have moved out The Guardian Anna Tims Mon 22 Apr 2024 The letter from the debt collection agency arrived out of the blue, and it was intimidating. It informed Joshua Simpson* that he owed £2,212 to Octopus Energy, and accused him of ignoring previous requests to settle the bill. If he did not stump up within 14 days, he was told, further action would be taken to recover the money. Simpson checked his Octopus account – it was in credit. Then he noticed the address where the debt had been accrued between 2022 and 2023. It was his childhood home – which his family had sold 18 years previously. "Since I was only 16 when we left the property, I was astonished that they'd linked my name [to it]," he says. "The debt collection agency insisted I provide a tenancy agreement to prove how long I've lived at my current address. I couldn't, since we bought our home. "They are now actively pursuing me for this debt, causing me a huge amount of stress. We are about to remortgage, and if this debt prevents us switching to a better deal, we will face real financial hardship." Simpson had been sucked into the shadowy world of "identity tracing", whereby investigators recruited by creditors seek to locate individuals who have moved home without paying their bills. It is an unregulated sector where anyone can set up as an agent in a back room without a licence, or scrutiny, and use fair means or foul to identify debtors. Reputable companies join a trade association that operates a code of practice, but membership is not mandatory, and mistakes are common. Last year, a teenage boy was chased for a debt of more than £900 by debt collectors acting for the energy company Ovo. A "trace agent" had somehow linked him to the debt because his parents had previously rented the property in question. An investigation by the Observer established that the debt had been run up by a subsequent tenant. The consequences of mistaken identity can be catastrophic. Individuals who are erroneously linked to a debt face, at worst, court action, bailiffs and a ruined credit rating. At best, they can endure weeks of stress and paperwork in order to prove they are not the debtor. It is estimated that 20m identity traces are made in the UK every year, many on behalf of companies that are owed money. Personal data is often obtained from credit reference agencies, which record applications for credit, and details are supposed to be verified with several different sources before being used for debt enforcement. In practice, however, this does not always happen. Simpson's details had been passed along a chain of intermediaries before the demand was issued. Octopus had given the unpaid account to a debt collection agent, which had contracted a tracing service, GBG, to find the debtor................ Full Article: https://www.theguardian.com/money/2023/oct/04/a-cry-for-help-energy-providers-play-the-villain-in-dramas-to-chill-the-blood ..............The Financial Ombudsman Service, which investigates complaints about financial firms, states that debt collection agents have to produce convincing evidence to link an individual to a debt, rather than rely on names, addresses and birth dates. According to the trade association, the Institute of Professional Investigators, an unknown number of investigators and trace agents are operating below the radar. Many more are merely inept, as data protection compliance training is not mandatory. "We have been campaigning for many, many years to try to get all private investigators regulated," says secretary general Glyn Evans.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Bigyeti and the daily overdraft charges


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4900 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have let Halifax carry on piling on their unagreed charges for several months now and they are now running to £150 per month meaning the account accordig to them is now £812 overdrawn. So far so extortionate. However, after checking my credit record, they are filing stuff on there each month. I sent a CCA request and they returned it saying that there isn't a credit agreement on this type of account.

 

I was hoping they might admit that I haven't agreed to the new charges. So, does an overdraft come under the Consumer Credit Act?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

It seems that Section 10 of the CCA does indeed cover overdrafts. Now, they're stating the opposite. Does that mean that the overdraft is unenforcable including all the extraneous whimsical charges they have added on top?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

you know what i hope your right lol. im getting shafted by albion at the moment. after hbos terminating my accounts before remedy date on the default etc. hbos have added near a grand of charges on the two accounts. be intersting to see if they add more on end of this month, even after closing both acounts lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh they will. They say close the account, they mean just freeze it which means no transactions. Except their charges of course.

 

Anyway, I sent the cheque back again requesting the agreement and this time quoted the relevant legislation and mentioned the the Sebastyen vs Coutts case. Two days ago, they cashed the cheque so we'll see what comes up now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thetletters say ended my agreement. what agreement lol. as you say they will have no agreement to send you, i hope thats the case about it being unenforcable. that would be interesting. are hbos only allowed arrears if they unlawfully ended my agreement before the remedy date?? and not the overdraft.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they issued you a warning of an impending default with something like "You have 21 days to remedy the account and clear the arrears" and then they issue a default within that time, then they have cocked up. I don't know the precise legislation, but there is a substantial thread on here that explains it in far better detail.

 

I think this is the one

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?196312-Invalid-Default-Notices&highlight=default

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

They cashed the £1 cheque on 24th August, which was 15 days ago and therefore they have exceeded the time limit. I'm about to send this:

 

--

Regarding my request for a consumer credit agreement on this account.

 

As the debt for the above account now entirely consists of an overdraft, it does in fact fall under the debtor-creditor agreement within the meaning of s.8 and s.13© of the Consumer Credit Act 1974, as demonstrated in the case of Coutts v Sebestyen (14th April 2005).

 

Consequently, my previous letter was a formal request for a copy of the signed, executed credit agreement for the above account. I required you to provide me with a true copy of the credit agreement relating to the above account, together with any other documentation the Act requires you to provide.

 

The Consumer Credit Act allows twelve working days for this request to be carried out before your company enter into a default situation. Although you had cashed the cheque for the statutory fee of £1.00 on 24th August 2010, I have yet to receive the documentation you are obliged to provide within the time limit despite my properly formatted and paid for request. If the request is not satisfied after a further 30 calendar days, an offence has been committed by you Halifax. These time limits expire(d) on 5th September 2010 and 5th October 2010 respectively.

--

Anyone see anything I have missed/should have omitted?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sending this also:

 

---

I received your letter dated 6th September 2010, pushed through my door by a surprisingly cheerful postman. You commence your letter with:

 

 

Pay £xxx now

 

 

Followed by an invitation to help you earn yet more of my cash by calling your 0845 number. I make a point of not calling 0845 numbers. It inevitably works out cheaper to write letters given how long I often end up on hold.

 

As you removed the overdraft facility as detailed in a letter dated 30th April 2010, our 'arranged overdraft' is technically £0.00. This being the case, your statement that we are over our arranged overdraft limit by £xxx suits me fine. This is quite pleasing as I thought we owed just short of £Lots, not allowing for the thoroughly bizarre charging regime you are attempting to force upon us. You know, the one that we didn't agree to in five (5) separate letters. I'll say it again; "we don't agree to your new charging regime, and never did"

 

and here it is again in red.

 

 

"We don't agree to your new charging regime, and never did"

 

 

Short of hiring a small plane and sky-writing it in red smoke I cannot think of any other way to get you to take notice. I'll make the offer to repay it again. You calculate how much is owed using the old interest rates that we agreed to and we'll pay £10 per week plus more if we can spare it. I'll enclose a cheque to sweeten the deal. You can't say fairer than that.

 

Yours,

Bigyeti

 

PS: Where's my true copy of the CCA agreement that I paid for?

Edited by bigyeti
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Well, the deadline has passed. They also seem to have stopped sending the weekly reminders.

Now, should I sue them for the amount that will zero my account? Or is there another route to go down that will get shut of them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

hey bigyeti, i see the fight is still on. my situation is a bit strange now. 2 letter sent to albion offering 25 bucks on each account and they are still asking me to call them to discuss my income and expenditure, i dont see why i have to discuss my finances. they are not giving me details of how i can pay money into these accounts at the figure i offered evry month, and i will not call them, no chance.

 

two dodgy defaults and early terminations so the balls in my court and im making an offer of what i can afford each month and they are not willing to get the ball rolling and accept my payment. any ideas?? or just sight tight. no letters for 2 weeks, definatly going to hear before the end of the week

Link to post
Share on other sites

Halifax never sent me a CCA to show that I am liable for the amount they claim, which they keep increasing by £150 pcm (£5 a day). So they defaulted on that even though they cashed the £1 cheque I sent and have carried on adding the charges to my account. They've flaunted so many regulations I'm losing track.

 

My advice is to never call them. Ever. I do everything by post and any other form of correspondence gets ignored.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Got a letter this morning. As we'd not used the account since before Xmas, they've credited my account with the charges taken (about £1000) halted all further charges and have asked to call them up and arrange a payment plan. Hurrah!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

hiya bigyeti

 

found this thread of yours and now i will spend a bit of time to read everything and i may pinch a few of your quotes but in my own words in my letter of course

 

you are a gem

 

will keep you updated cheers angel x

Im happy to help with support and my own thoughts, but if I offer any thoughts to your problems please take it as from my life experience only and not of any legal standing. Always take further advice from the legal experts in your final action.:)

 

my new motto is,,,",Taking back control of your life and home - such peace is priceless"

 

This is all due to truecall device , have a serious peek at this you will be thankful like I am x laters angel :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...