Jump to content
  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • More than 364,000 cases of fraud were recorded to the National Fraud Database in 2019 - the highest ever recorded View the full article
    • If its a domestic address and a normal account, thought they could only bill who is on the Tenancy agreement or Mortgage, as isn't a Tenancy in Common. if Joint tenancy and other party gone, didn't think children who have gained majority can be held liable, as not on any paperwork, apart from Electoral roll.  Is a Lodger liable?
    • Thank you so much for explaining that to me much appreciated 
    • It's not so bad then.  1250L is the standard tax code, and means he can earn £12500 pounds without paying tax, and then just pay tax on anything he earns over that amount.   Due to technically being out of work, and claiming UC, and now going back to work, the code is saying that he will pay tax on anything earned over £6500 pounds now, but it is under review and should change within the next 8-12 weeks, and if he has overpaid in the meantime, then it will be refunded via his paycheck.   The only reason for this is I am assuming that while shielding, his company did not keep him on the books.  If HMRC have got a record of him being on the books, and claiming UC, this will be them determining that he hasn't been trying to fraud the system by being paid as employed at the same time as claiming UC.  Once they clear that up, then they will correct the tax code.  So long as all his earnings and benefits all add up and they are happy then it will be back to normal.
    • Good Afternoon,   I am hoping to receive some advice regarding the below topic.   I was looking to purchase a property off-plan with a incentive attached and in order to secure this you pay a 'finder's fee'.     The fee was paid but then the property was un-mortgageable due to various reasons including the incentive being offered.   Having gone back to the agent to ask for a return of the finder's fee - they have refused saying that the incentive does not need to be disclosed and that essentially my broker is useless and I should use theirs!   Their broker also advised it would be hard to get a mortgage with the incentive disclosed which backs up what my broker has said.    This fee will now be kept on account.     I signed a form which confirms that the finders fee is non refundable - which was my error I should have checked if the property was mortgageable beforehand - however I wondered if there was anything I could do because:   The property is un-mortgageable - my broker tried all lenders including those who are happy with the incentive which was offered They have advised to withhold information which is clearly questioned in the mortgage application process   This is not a case of pulling out, this is a case that I cannot get finance and so cannot proceed.   Thanks in advance.
  • Our picks

    • Curry’s cancelled my order but took the money anyway. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/423055-curry%E2%80%99s-cancelled-my-order-but-took-the-money-anyway/
      • 11 replies
    • Father passed away - Ardent Credit Services (Vodafone) now claiming he owes money. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/423040-father-passed-away-ardent-credit-services-vodafone-now-claiming-he-owes-money/
      • 9 replies
    • Currys Refuse Refund F/Freezer 5day old. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422656-currys-refuse-refund-ffreezer-5day-old/
      • 6 replies
    • Hi,  
      I was in Sainsbury’s today and did scan and shop.
      I arrived in after a busy day at work and immediately got distracted by the clothes.
       
      I put a few things in my trolley and then did a shop.
      I paid and was about to get into my car when the security guard stopped me and asked me to come back in.
       
      I did and they took me upstairs.
      I was mortified and said I forgot to scan the clothes and a conditioner, 5 items.
      I know its unacceptable but I was distracted and Initially hadn’t really planned to use scan and shop.
       
      No excuse.
      I offered to pay for the goods but the manager said it was too late.
      He looked at the CCTV and because I didn’t try to scan the items he was phoning the police.
       
      The cost of the items was about £40.
      I was crying at this point and told them I was a nurse, just coming from work and I could get struck off.
       
      They rang the police anyway and they came and issued me with a community resolution notice, which goes off my record in a year.
      I feel terrible. I have to declare this to my employer and NMC.
       
      They kept me in a room on my own with 4 staff and have banned me from all stores.
      The police said if I didn’t do the community order I would go to court and they would refer me to the PPS.
       
      I’m so stressed,
      can u appeal this or should I just accept it?
       
      Thanks for reading 
      • 16 replies
boingy

Very disappointed with FOS response

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 3540 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

I recently complained to the FOS about my credit card company adding charges an interest to my account whilst they hadn't responded to a S78(1) request in a timely manner.

 

S78(6)(a) states that the credit can't enforce the account during this time, which is exactly what my CC company did, for four months until they finally managed to respond to my S78(1) request.

 

As soon as my CC company sent a copy of my CCA and S78(6)(a) no longer applied, I continued making what was my minimum payment before they defaulted, whilst challenging the charges and interest applied whilst they were in default.

 

Despite sending copies of all correspondance and evidence to the FOS, with me clearly explaining my situation and highlighting specific terms of the CCA, the FOS wouldn't uphold my complaint.

 

What a farce. I thought the FOS were there to protect consumers? My CC company have blatantly breached the CCA, and the FOS won't help, despite me not doing anything wrong. I'm now in the region of £1000 down.

 

Thanks for nothing FOS! :mad:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

FOS are not there to protect consumers. Regulation by the FSA is set out to protect consumers. FOS are an indpendant arbritator there to settle complaints between you and the bank/firm.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
FOS are an indpendant arbritator there to settle complaints between you and the bank/firm.

 

Yeah, right .....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
FOS are not there to protect consumers. Regulation by the FSA is set out to protect consumers. FOS are an indpendant arbritator there to settle complaints between you and the bank/firm.

 

 

 

rubbish they are on the side off the banks


:D I WON. HALIFAX PAID IN FULL DONT GIVE UP THE FIGHT IT WILL BE ALRIGHT:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Banks know they can get away with murder, thats why they refer matters to the FOS, in reality the FOS are useless.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
rubbish they are on the side off the banks

 

you dont have a clue what you are talking about

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
you dont have a clue what you are talking about

 

You don't seem to have any idea of how bad the FOS can be, or maybe you've only had good experiences with them. They are DEFINITELY on the side of the banks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You don't seem to have any idea of how bad the FOS can be, or maybe you've only had good experiences with them. They are DEFINITELY on the side of the banks.

 

based on the fact they rejected your complaint?

FOS uphold a majority of complaints in favour of the consumer so therefore are definetely not on the side of the banks. If yours was rejected then there would be a reason why.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
based on the fact they rejected your complaint?

 

Nope, based on the fact that i had many complaints upheld and many rejected and i've had in depth discussions with them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
FOS uphold a majority of complaints in favour of the consumer so therefore are definetely not on the side of the banks.

 

based on the fact yours were upheld so you didn't have to suffer irrational decisions and a lack of transparency or any regard for the law (which they can and do disregard when it suits them)?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
based on the fact yours were upheld so you didn't have to suffer irrational decisions and a lack of transparency or any regard for the law (which they can and do disregard when it suits them)?

 

I havent had a decision upheld, I worked there.

 

A lot of consumers complain to FOS with allegations that cannot be proven. The banks provide written evidence of such documents being signed and consumer provided with information. Documentary evidence will always take presidence over 'I wasnt told this, I wasnt told that' and would do in court too.

 

The timescales are shocking at the moment, but they are getting over 2000 complaints a week at the moment and its such a shame this 'reclaim' culture and these CMC [problematic] are taking over a majority of their workload.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I havent had a decision upheld, I worked there.

 

Maybe you can tell us :

 

Why can the FOS disregard law and established precedents in favour of being 'fair and reasonable' when it helps the bank but won't use the same criteria which helps the consumer.

 

Why can they award money to a third party who is not a part of the complaint, has never been a part and has never (obviously) submitted any documents. I'm told the FOS have no power to join a third party to a complaint but seem to think it fair to send them money.

 

Why will an Ombudsman never overturn an Adjudicator decision which is clearly wrong. For example, where an Adjudicator says 'i don't care what you say'.

 

I could go on with many more questions which have never been answered. I'm not here to argue with you, but the FOS is not fair and reasonable at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Maybe you can tell us :

 

Why can the FOS disregard law and established precedents in favour of being 'fair and reasonable' when it helps the bank but won't use the same criteria which helps the consumer.

 

Why can they award money to a third party who is not a part of the complaint, has never been a part and has never (obviously) submitted any documents. I'm told the FOS have no power to join a third party to a complaint but seem to think it fair to send them money.

 

Why will an Ombudsman never overturn an Adjudicator decision which is clearly wrong. For example, where an Adjudicator says 'i don't care what you say'.

 

I could go on with many more questions which have never been answered. I'm not here to argue with you, but the FOS is not fair and reasonable at all.

 

1. FOS do not disregard law and would use the same criteria for a consumer. The problem being is often the consumer has no evidence and the bank does. This point also makes no sense as FOS uphold a majority of complaints.

2. FOS do not award money, they instruct the bank/firm in question to do that. I assume you mean the claims management companies receiving money. A consumer has a right to sign a contract for someone to deal with their complaint. If someone makes a complaint on behalf of a consumer, as long as there is written authorisation it is not for FOS to question. If a CMC acts outside of their contract or takes money they shouldnt off the consumer, then this would be a matter for Ministry of Justice to investigate not FOS.

3. I was an adjudicator myself, we are given guidelines by the Ombudsman, therefore an adjudicator has followed the same guidelines as what the Ombudsman would do themself. Only an adjudicator who made a wrong decision or their was more evidence providence after the adudicators response then it would be overturned.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1. FOS do not disregard law and would use the same criteria for a consumer. The problem being is often the consumer has no evidence and the bank does. This point also makes no sense as FOS uphold a majority of complaints.

2. FOS do not award money, they instruct the bank/firm in question to do that. I assume you mean the claims management companies receiving money. A consumer has a right to sign a contract for someone to deal with their complaint. If someone makes a complaint on behalf of a consumer, as long as there is written authorisation it is not for FOS to question. If a CMC acts outside of their contract or takes money they shouldnt off the consumer, then this would be a matter for Ministry of Justice to investigate not FOS.

3. I was an adjudicator myself, we are given guidelines by the Ombudsman, therefore an adjudicator has followed the same guidelines as what the Ombudsman would do themself. Only an adjudicator who made a wrong decision or their was more evidence providence after the adudicators response then it would be overturned.

 

In reply to your points:

 

1. The FOS disregarded law in my case. I won't go into details as it is comprehensive, but the main law here was s.136 LoP 1925 as used for assignment of debts. In my case, they used this against me when required and disregarded this against the bank.

 

2. No CMC involved in my cases. My debts were sold to DCAs by assignment. Some I settled (including paying the charges, PPI and associated interest), some were outstanding. In each case, the FOS said because the debts were assigned the DCA should get the refund, even with the settled accounts (proof was shown and the DCA themselves said there was a £0 balance). They said if i didn't accept this, then the bank can keep the refund towards its write off (when it sold the account). They said assignment didn't matter since the bank was left with an unpaid balance. These decisions were clearly irrational. It meant i was in effect paying the DCA and the bank for the same 'debt' and when they wanted to pay the DCA then assignment mattered and when they wanted the bank to keep the money it didn't matter. In the end, i ended with getting no refund though the bank wanted to send the money to the DCA. The FOS said it was up to me to then chase the DCA for my money.

 

3. In my cases, the DCA was being sent the money without ever submitting anything to the FOS and purely based on the bank's offer. The FOS said they have no power to include a third party into a complaint between myself and the bank yet they had the power to send my money to a third party not involved with the complaint.

 

4. I took a few of the cases to the Independent Assessor but they were upheld for the FOS. I did not get the answer to why the FOS can pay my money to a third party not involved in the complaint and/or to whom i owe no money and why the bank can put my money toward a write off done when they sold the account.

 

I could go on with many other examples of how i feel i was treated badly by the FOS but there's no use. With many of the cases, the bank still sent the refund to the DCA even though i clearly did not accept their offer FOS decision. The FOS said this doesn't matter to them as it's between me and the bank. In a way i had not choice and it didn't seem to matter whether i accepted a settlement or not, the bank did what they wanted anyway.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In my daughter's case, which I have just asked to be escalated to next level. How does she prove bank didn't send her letters? Other than fact her salary went missing as a result. Other than fact that bank sent letter admitting they did not send letters to every customer! Other than the fact no rational person would ignore a letter telling you to change the sort code and a/c no that your employer pays your salary into or you won't get paid; but FOS seem to think my daughter would do something this stupid and take the risk of all her DD's not being paid and incurring massive bank charges!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

4. I took a few of the cases to the Independent Assessor but they were upheld for the FOS. I did not get the answer to why the FOS can pay my money to a third party not involved in the complaint

 

 

FOS do no pay/send any money, so stop saying they did. Your bank paid it.

Also the bank if within their rights to pay money towards a debt if it is still there. FOS cannot change that and it is not unlawful. However, if the balance is nil, I do not understand why they would do that so you should persue it with the bank.

Edited by dirkuberpower

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Based on my experience FOS definitley side with the financial institution. If you challenge their decision it seems that they then reverse it. FOS will only advise on the legality of the extra interest and it is for you to challenge it in court and the banks know this which is why they could not be bothered with keeping to the regulations as there is NO ONE to enforce them on behalf of the consumer!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...