Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help with Welcome/MKRR


tallulahbean
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5003 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

I would really appreciate some advice if anyone can help?

I got a loan through Welcome in April 2007. I made payments for the first 3 months then started to struggle so signed a new agreement with a reduced payment. I made these payments for a couple of months and then became homeless and stopped paying. My last payment was January 2008 (I think).

Stupidly, once I was back on my feet I didn't contact them and kind of hoped it would go away.

Last September they sent bailiffs (apparently) to my parents house. I didn't live there then and didn't when I took the loan out. My parents (who I do not have a relationship with) told them I don't live there and then nothing else was heard from them until today.

I have received messages on both my work phone and mobile phone from a man at MKRR asking me to call him in regard to the welcome loan.

Now in the meantime I have had a baby, split with my partner and once again I have no fixed address. (My daughter lives with my ex). Yes I know my life is a mess and I am trying to sort it out.

Can I stop this new company calling me at work? And should I talk to them with regard to making a repayment plan? I don't have any of the original paperwork as it was lost when I left my previous address.

I can't request anything in writing as I don't have an address it can be sent to, so what should I do?

Any help will be gratefully received.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If baillifs have been involved, you can probably assume this has gone to court and you have a CCJ against you. However, I suspect that whoever called may have simply tried to pass themselves off as bailiffs, when they are in all lielihood, common or garden gangsters. Errm, debt collectors. Yes, that's what I mean.

 

Gangsters have of course some sort of moral code that they abide by, however warped and twisted it might appear to normal people. Whereas debt collectors...

 

And since this MKRR crowd have been able to track your phone number down, it seems reasonable to assume that they know your address. So why have they not bothered writing to you at your current address? Because they are a shower of feckless inbreeds. Or something along those lines anyway.

 

It seems that MKRR are involved with handling a few of Welcome's debts right now. Whether as purchasers or simply as a DCA I do not yet know.

 

But I do wonder though, that if they are just a DCA, why has it been passed to them, rather than the Lewis group.

 

So what to do about the calls? I would simply tell them that you have no idea what they are talking about, to please stop calling as they obviously have the wrong person (it happens more times than you think), and if they really want to get hold of the person they claim owes money, to write to them as should have been their first action.

 

Failing which, you wil report them to Trading Standars, the OFT, Uncle Tom Cobley and all.

 

At least then, if they write to you, you'll be better prepared.

 

If they don't write to you, I'd just ignore the idiots and buy a very loud whistle.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry Fester im giggling over your post :lol: I do love your sense of humour. Agree totally with what you have said :)

I am a consumer just like you, please get a second opinion or investigate yourself on anything I advise as I am in no way legally trained. Everything I know has come from the Mighty CAG and fellow CAGGERS. :cool:

 

If I have helped in any way please click my reputation star and make a donation to CAG to enable us all to continue to help each other :cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, enough japery. Time to get serious.

 

In the first instance, anybody who simply phones is not entitled to a response whatsoever. Make it plain next time that you neither know who they are, nor will you put up with their nonsense. And that without proof of who they are, you are now going to report every call to the police as they are frightening and intimidating and could be anybody. And make sure you DO complain to the police. Make a note of dates and times of calls. to what number, and if possible, what the number was that called you.

 

They really do not have a leg to stand on at the moment and are bullying cowards literally trying to frighten you into paying up, when to all intents and purposes, they appear not to even know that they have the corrrect person.

 

It seems that Welcome are starting to sell some of their account on, and MKRR are now the recipients of that debt. So I imagine that this has what has happened to you.

 

But you should be aware that unless you are, at the very least, served with a Notice of Assignment, they have no right to be making any attempt whatsoever to collect on any alleged debt. In other words, they are at best, acting unlawfully.

 

In reality, absolutely anybody could make PHISHING calls in an attempt to illegally obtain money to which they are not entitled. And they could call themselves anything they want. How do you know they are genuine? Exactly. You don't. So you are perfectly entitled to complain to the police.

 

Oh, and I'm serious about the whistle. Just make it plain that you intend to use it. I'd give them about a 2 second warning.

 

Oh, and DO NOT let them bully you into revealing your address. This is information they should already have. If they don't, they can feckoff.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your responses Fester :) I have checked my credit file and it states there is a debt with Welcome that is satisfied and says that it has been assigned. It also states that I defaulted in october of last year?! I can't see anything relating to a CCJ or a debt with MKRR. I have had no post sent to my parents address AT ALL regarding this debt. Obviously they can't have an address for me as I don't actually have one, but my ex is still at the previous address and there has been nothing sent there either?! So it appears that they are saying I owe them x amount but have not written to me EVER regarding it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's all fine, and confirms that the alleged debt has been sold on. No need to worry about anything at this stage. Once MKRR do write (and I suppose that's a big IF), that bridge can be crossed then.

 

Until that time, no need to worry about anything, as they are acting unlawfully at the moment. You are not obliged to pay, say, or admit to anything whatsoever.

 

Post up any letters you MAY get as a result. You MIGHT end up having to deal with them. But at least it will be on YOUR terms, and not theirs. Bullying **** that they are.

 

Bailiffs my posterior!!! HAHAHA.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Generally, creditors will get fed up after about 3 months of no payment before issuing a default notice. Although recently, Capital One gave me about a year but I think that's purely because I've been in almost constant dispute with them.

 

Once a debt has been assigned, the new owner of the alleged debt will try to get a default on your files as soon as they can. As you've seen, Welcome have now washed their hands of things completely as far as reporting to the CRAs. Now MKRR (Milton Keynes Rapid Recovery) will say that they are obliged to continue the reporting of the default. They DO NOT have any right to report it as a new default, so they can't tell you it will be on there for 6 years. It's 6 years from the first mention by Welcome.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hahahahaha 'compliant manner'

I am a consumer just like you, please get a second opinion or investigate yourself on anything I advise as I am in no way legally trained. Everything I know has come from the Mighty CAG and fellow CAGGERS. :cool:

 

If I have helped in any way please click my reputation star and make a donation to CAG to enable us all to continue to help each other :cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...