Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
    • The streaming giant also said it added 9.3 million subscribers in the first three months of the year.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ESA decision made without medical reports


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5005 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I failed my recent ESA medical and this is what they said:

 

'You scored 0 points using the information from@

 

- The questionnaire you filled in recently

-the report of the medical assessment you had on xx/xx/xxxx'

 

ie they did not even request a medical report from my GP or Neurologist. they say I have not had more than one fit in the last 6 months. this is a total and blatant lie, fabrication and assertion in direct contradiction of the evidence and what i told them.

 

can ATOS/DWP make a decision in 4 working days and without seeing my medical reports? Is this decision valid even though they haven't seen reports form my GP and Neurologist?

 

Who can I complain to?

 

thanks

 

 

sd

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe that DWP are not required to request medical evidence in addition to the assessment by ATOS. I believe you now have to appeal, but hopefully someone will be along soon with specific advice.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again. I'm really sorry to hear that.

 

Sadly, this is pretty normal for the system and no-one here agrees with it, as you've probably read on the forum. I don't know what the others think, but I would be inclined to use the GL24 to appeal this.

 

Do you have supporting information from your GP or neurologist in writing, or would they be prepared to write?

 

I know you feel like complaining, but I'm not sure where this would get you. Hopefully someone else will comment.

 

My best, HB

 

PS My sticky has information on appeals, but you will probably have other questions for us.

Edited by honeybee13
PS

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hellow stalins dead:)

 

this how they get you:mad:

 

they do not take any of your proper evidence into account.(your gp/ nerologist/ consultant opinion is "irrelevant")

 

dwp/atos are basically "crap ing" on them, and proper "qualfied " doctors are letting/ seem to be letting this continue:rolleyes: The reasons "WHY", this is, i do not know.(any qualified gps/consultants want to "answer" this.

 

its feels like to me,1 their not bothered, concearned ,intrested:rolleyes:

2-they might in someway , have been " told to stay quiet" .........who knows.

 

on your esa50 form (questionaire), did you put info on it regarding your

gps/nerologist details who have been treating you.:?:

 

I also got 0 points(thats nothing new on here, , a lot of us in the "same boat" :rolleyes:

 

you will get help/ advice and support on here:)

cheers happyhamr :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

hh

 

yes, on the ESA50 I wrote down my GP and Neurologist but it seems they have not requested reports from them.

 

The ATOS medical 'person' who took the medical was obviously NOT professionally qualified. He was quite simply pathetic.

 

He had no idea what a grand mal seizure was because I asked him and he couldnt answer! What a pillock!!

 

It is quite obvious they are, as a matter of policy, failing as many as possible irrespective of the evidence

 

On my last medical I got 15 points (prior to the new Lib-Con govt) and after the election of Cameron etc and without any change in my condition I got 0 points. Explain that to me cos I cant understand. Two different decisions based on the same evidence.

 

Already asked DWP for GL24 and the medical report and will complete and submit asap.

 

good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

absolutely on your side stalins dead:-)

 

The reasons why they fail so many people is to save money.

 

you get 0 points, you appeal so you get the £65(saving them all them extra £25,,,,they would have to pay out if you got the "magical" 15 points:rolleyes:

 

remember at this stage a lot of people do not appeal ,because 1- they can not be bothered to go through this process (to ill / sick and tired)2more form filling.(just had enough ,no fight left)

3 - people will just go back on JSA(basic rate)(limited time only ,then your

benifit would cease) 4- if you appeal the decision , you will continue to get paid at the assessment rate untill your appeal is heard,(whenever:rolleyes:)

 

if you think about it , if the dwp/atos let your gps/ consultants evidence

into the initial medical assessment s , many, many more people would get the 15 points "required"., plus get the extra monies(£25....)they should be getting(entitled)(rightly so)

 

they dont let this happen to save all those £25 pounds (IMO:))

 

ANY GPS/ CONSULTANTS "feel free"

 

cheers happyhamr:)

 

they will not of asked for reports from your gps/ consultants:rolleyes:

 

also your questionaire, might not of even been read,(imo),,,.

 

if these people have any decency and common sense, your esa50 like many others should be "acted" upon, but i fear this is not the case,

 

"SADLY",,,,,,,,,,, happyhamr:(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Disgraceful.

 

Surely a report to the BMA? This cannot be allowed. These untrained idiots have got to be removed. Imagine the outcry from middle england if when taking little Tamara to the doctors to check out her cough the doctor admits to being untrained.

 

But when it's benefit claimants no one cares.

 

That's not a chip on my shoulder, that's how it seems to be.

Link to post
Share on other sites

it's very difficult to fight the system which explains why many 'play the system'!

 

there are many genuine claimants and in fact we all believe ourselves to be 'genuine and honest claimants' but there are many who 'swing the lead'. I know it happens regularly so ATOS/DWP have a difficult job sometimes

 

I believe the Govt do not trust GP's to be objective and unbiased. I suspect the govt also believe GP's can be put under pressure by their patients (whom they have known for years) to compose biased reports etc and so ATOS/DWP now simply ignore them

Link to post
Share on other sites

hellow:)

 

surely by looking/ reading, reviewing your esa50 form(which should be done) , then the dwp /atos person should do some "initial" ground work by getting in touch with your gp/consultant before your actual medical. THEY

could confirm your history(stalins , case in point:rolleyes:) 15 points last time, this time 0:rolleyes: . "simple phone call" "simple fax " from gp/ doctor.

"simple e mail" then maybe stalins dead you might of got the "illusive"15 points.

 

probably like to much of a effort.(dwp/ atos)

 

you never know, 1 day your wife,husband,mum, dad , son or daughter might be seriously ill or sick. "think on"

 

happyhamr:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem is that the DWP do not trust GPs [weird!] and automatically assume they are biased to the patient. It is in the DWPs regulations to accept the word of ATOSH health [un]professionals above that of a GP. This, I presume, is why GPs are never contacted - and they're pretty peed off about this attitude from the DWP.

We can complain 'til the cows come home that unqualified ATOSH buffoons shouldn't be examining us. Unfortunately, the counter argument is that these are not 'medicals' at all but 'work capability assessments' to see what you can do not what is wrong with you. A pretty neat slight of hand imo...

Best wishes

Rae

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...