Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • HB, is the Kent/France issue related to current arrangement with French border officers in Kent and UK border officers in France ?   Not sure whether this  arrangement will change from 1/1/21, if there is no deal.   Given previous actions by French farmers and industrial action by others, then with UK out of the EU, I can see problems ahead. Could there be blockades at French ports, with UK unable to exert much pressure through EU ?      
    • Very good, UB.   I'm not clear on the status of Kent now. People are talking about it being part of France, etc, but how is tht when the 'border' only applies to lorries?
    • Campaign starts ? Independence for Kent, so it becomes a separate customs area and can charge a tariff on goods transported through its territory.  With the money raised, citizens of Kent might then have little or no income taxes to pay.   I could see this campaign being started and it could grow in popularity.   Would be funny if Brexit led to break up of UK and break away by some English counties. 
    • SERCO seem to be a default company that Government use to perform contact centre type tasks. So any department faced with a problem, say a sudden increase in incoming phone calls, which they cannot handle, because they are dealing with more immediate issues such as making payments to the public, may in the short term involve SERCO.   SERCO seem to employ a lot of security cleared, DBS checked, financial checked etc employees, so they seem to be equipped and ready to manage tasks on behalf of Government departments.   No idea just how much work SERCO does on behalf of Government, but I should imagine it makes up a sizeable chunk of their business.   Public Health departments may want to perform the work themselves, but given the number of employees required, the recruitment process involved, the hours of work 24/7 and just how quick they need to be set up to perform the work, I question whether they are better placed to do so.   I would always prefer public sector employees over outsourced contracts, but I can understand why Government uses companies such as SERCO. 
    • Well, we’ve found something we agree on.   you’ve described the unfairness, but haven’t said what (realistically!) you feel your options are.
  • Our picks

    • @curryspcworld @TeamKnowhowUK - Samsung 75 8K TV - completely broken by Currys. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/426151-samsung-75-8k-tv-completely-broken-by-currys/&do=findComment&comment=5069075
      • 6 replies
    • @skinnyfoodco Skinny Foods. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/426130-skinny-foods/&do=findComment&comment=5068996
      • 8 replies
    • I’m in desperate need of help
       
      I bought some clothes online in may through Evans and paid through PayPal
      returned them all seven days later
       
      I waited the 14days for my refund and no refund came
      I put in a dispute through PayPal but I didn’t get any emails to escalate the case - PayPal closed it. 
      evans said they couldn’t refund the money because PayPal have cancelled the refund because of the open dispute
       
      I contacted PayPal
      they said the dispute had been closed but Evans at no point had attempted a refund.
      fast forward to today
       
      I’ve got copies of numerous messages sent to and from twitter messages as it’s the only way I can contact them
      I’ve also contacted their customer service too
      all I get is PayPal have cancelled refund because dispute is still open.
       
      I have proved that the dispute is closed
      I have got an email saying that if Evans sent the refund they would accept it
      but up until the date I got the email they have not once attempted a refund .
       
       I have sent them a letter before court email
      I have even offered to have the full refund as a gift card just to get this sorted !
       
      I’m literally at the end of my tether and don’t know where to turn next !
       
      i suffer with mental health issues and this is affecting my health and I’d saved the money for a year to buy these clothes as I’m on a low income .
    • In desperate need of help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/425244-in-desperate-need-of-help/&do=findComment&comment=5067040
      • 29 replies

Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 3700 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Ive never rented through a letting agent before so help would be much appreciated.

Me and my boyfriend have been looking to move in together and we've found a nice place, I phoned today to see what details they needed and they told me they want a £195 'tennant fee' upfront before they speak to the landlord - I spoke to my mom about this and she doesnt think this is right, and on Shelter and Citizens Advice websites it says :

'A letting agency can charge you:

an unlimited fee once you have signed a contract to accept a tenancy

You must have agreed to take the tenancy before the agency can charge you.'

 

So therefore, they cant charge me a non refundable fee before us and the landlord have agreed a deal, or am I wrong?

 

Huge Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I googled and found a link to a CAB document that included this. The document I found *does also* say that the agent can charge "A non-returnable holding deposit" before a tenancy agreement is signed, and says that the fee should be refunded if the landlord withdraws.

 

The holding deposit may be used by the agent to cover admin expenses and/or may be offset against the rent. It's not a payment for holding the property.

 

I would try to get in writing the terms of the fee from the agent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've had an unpleasant experience with the lettings dept of an estate agency. I had been told--verbally--the previous day on the phone that it would be £230 for one person and £270 for two people 'to secure the property'. I was seriously interested in the property after viewing it, so I searched in vain on the agent's website for the details of what exactly this unusually large deposit was for. I went to the office the next morning and asked for written disclosure of the purposes of the fees. I was handed me a 'good faith' document, which had blanks--for amounts to be filled in by hand--in the place of amounts. I asked again, but where is the written disclosure about what the fees are for? The agent then claimed they didn't have them in writing. Then, the man who called the previous day to set up the viewing said, 'I told you on the phone it would be £270'. I said yes but I have a right to see written evidence of what the fee is for, the breakdown of charges, and the terms. Then the agent said, 'no one else has ever made an issue of this'. I said, yes, that is what people usually say when someone questions their business practices. I should be clear that I was in no way objecting to the *amount* of the deposit, but rather insisting upon my right as a consumer to have disclosure in writing as to its precise purpose and breakdown of costs involved. Or is this not a consumer right in the UK? (I am a foreigner) I had to excuse myself to take a phone call I had told the agent I was waiting for. When I returned, after about 10 minutes, the man who had set up the viewing (and who had resisted disclosing in writing the terms and fees) said to me 'oh, we've spoken to the landlords and they have decided to rent to the other person'. I was in the office prepared to sign an agreement, and the other person had only engaged by telephone, so it wasn't possible that s/he had paid the 'deposit to secure the property'. I was quite distressed as I feel that the agents had sabotaged my tenancy because I challenged them about proper disclosure of their fees.

 

I noticed that Aequitas above says these fees are unjustifiable. Could someone refer me to the Consumer Law and/or other information that would help me determine the lawfulness of this practice? I should mention that I'm in the Midlands and I've never heard of such a high fee and it is customary (as I told the agent) for letting agents to post this written disclosure on their websites. I've never had this problem before and I've viewed lots of properties. This was the first time I had ever dealt with this particular agent and I'm not happy about my experience..

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...