Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • See what the latest data on school suspensions tells us about the UK education system and early intervention.View the full article
    • The world's largest economy grew less than expected but rising inflation may delay a rate cut.View the full article
    • Hello, Following the submission of my defense, last night I received an email from DCBL indicating that the claimant intends to proceed with the claim (I've attached a screenshot of the email for reference) along with the N180 directions questionnaire. I'm unsure how they obtained my email, but I suspect it was through the courts' form when I completed the Acknowledgment of Service. This email almost slipped my attention. I have also today received a letter from court to state they have received my defense.  It appears they are requesting an online telephone hearing with the court. Could you please advise me on the necessary steps I should take at this point? Thank you for your assistance. Letter-Email 25-04-24.pdf N180 - Directions questionnaire (Small Claims Track).pdf
    • Default Amount £9237.88, all this started in 2006 Admitted debt £9075.65 Weightmans added £1515.01 immediately they became involved, no explanation The Statement shows when Marlin bought debt in May 2011 £10439.25 Their statements, not received until the SAR, are based on this. Cabot deducted £1515.01on their statements in January 2019, again did not find this out until SAR. Weightmans added in  2007 after the CH1 etc was confirmed by the court £741.50, made up of Process server fees, Court Fee (they tried for bankruptcy), Solicitors fee and Land Registry fee. Unspecfied Legal costs were added by Marlin in March 2015, again I did not know this until statements received with SAR I had been paying monthly, without exception until December 2018. I am minded to take the property charge, CH1 amount ,deduct all my payments and the subsequent fees, and request/demand a refund on the final payment made? I consistently disputed Weightmans balances, but they never responded. I also told Mortimer Clarke/Cabot that I disputed their amounts.  
    • Just follow this link and have read of some threads so your familiar with the process https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/347310-legal-n180-directions-questionnaire-small-claims-track/#comment-5178739
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

MBNA [A+L] sold CCard debt to hillsdens - court claim **Settled by F&F**


davidoneman
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4973 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 139
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

As it contains all the prescribed terms then it would be enforceable.

 

Have a look at these links which may help you understand the enforceabilty of the paperwork (courtesy of 42man & steven4064) -

 

 

Is My Agreement Enforceable - Useful

Consumer Credit Agreements

 

Also, have look at the link below - http://www.consumerforums.com/resour...lication-forms

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Hi just recieved a claim form hillesden securities , for £4877.05 + £85 court fee and £80 solicitors fee. i have looked and i have had 9 late fee charges of £12each and 8 over limit charges £12each. what should i do about the court claim , all help is much appriciated

 

Hi i have an old a&l credit card which was sold to hillsden securities and i have just recieved court papers , is there any laws on irrasponsible lending ? also is there any thing i can do about it ive had 17 £12 charges on for late fees and over balance, the credit agreement is http://i46.tinypic.com/1zoeuck.jpg. thanks for any help recieved.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is not worth the paper it is written on. Be sure to send off the acknowledgement to the court. You will be defending all of their claim and will win hands down. Later when you submit a defense ask on here in good time and help will be swift.

Link to post
Share on other sites

so what defence do i send ? so is the credit agreement enforcable or not ? sorry all the questions just flapping alittle

 

Hi

just having abit of trouble with 1 of my debts ,

 

its been sold to hillsdens ,

 

( got a county court claim yesterday)

 

can a company sell a debt if they havnt supplied me with a DN ,

 

if that is the case i dont remember recieving one and

 

as i didnt have to sign for it they dont have proof ive ever recieved it ?

 

is that correct ?

 

sorry for the questions just need to sort it out for the court case .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi David,

More to the point, they certainly must issue a valid DN prior to demanding the full balance/terminating/taking court action.

Unfortunately however there is no requirement for them to send a DN by Recorded Delivery. Normal mail is standard. Did you receive a Notice of Assignment to Hilsdens?

I think you need to send a Subject Access Request to the original company. State specifically that you require a copy of the actual DN, termination and Assignment notices, otherwise you'll just get a computer printout stating date sent (if any). Is it a CCard, loan or OD?

Elsa x

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi its a credit card debt this is credit agreement http://i46.tinypic.com/1zoeuck.jpg , i cant remember if i recieved a dn , i remember a letter saying it had been sold , i did a sar report but didnt include dn , termination and assignment noticed , should i send a letter saying that i did not get all the information i required and state that im wanting these as ive allready paid the £10 , should i send the court papers saying im wanting more time to sort this out , then i should have the dn to check by then ? cheers dave

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morning,

 

The problem with DN's is that they are template letters and they just add your details to it before posting.

On their systems they log it as being issued but doesn't say posted and they don't keep copies of these letters.

If you got any account information, look through it carefully to see if it says anything about a DN.

If it does, check the dates to when it was "sent" and when the debt was assigned.

If they do send you a DN on request, it is more likely to be generic with none of your details on it.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

can i jump in people

 

a creditor can sell an account with out a default notice providing the account

 

HAS NOT BEEN TERMINATED PRIOR TO SALE.

 

so if you have a termination notice, its end game

 

where the likes of credit card companies frack up is the new creditor (dca) cant offer a credit card to replace the original card so is a breach of agreement between you and the original creditor

 

to start any future legal action

 

the new dca (creditor) would then have to issue a DN

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ive just look at the log i was sent in my sar it says 18/03/09 uency on accs, default/timescale/sod . then on the 20/04/09 sold to direct legal then it says sold 18th april. I have just looked at my credit file it says hillsden securites credit card default 03/2009 end 31/03/2009 , how can that be if mbna didnt sell it till 18/04/2009 ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

When a debt is sold, the new owner replaces the original creditors name. The date stays the same as you cannot be defaulted on the same account twice and a new date cannot be inserted

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

This Is What Confuses Me

 

As Stated A Crediror Can Pass On An Account To A New Creditor As Long As The Account Has Not Been Terminated Or Defaulted And The New Creditor Must Continue With The T&c Of The Old Agreement, Ie, Giving A New Credit Card

 

Morgan Stanley, Goldfish And Barclaycard For Instance

 

But Why Would A Creditor Sell An Account To A Dca, Not Just Transfer The Ownership

 

remember People

 

Ime Talking About Transfering An Agreement Between Creditors

 

Not Selling A Deliquent Account To A Dca But A Live Account

 

so does that mean i need to have had a dn from hillsdens to take me to court , is the credit agreement how it should be ?

 

 

NO

 

IN YOUR CASE THE ORIGINAL CREDITOR WOULD HAVE DEFAULTED

 

DEMAND TO SEE THE ORIGINAL DEFAULT NOTICE

 

ASK TO SEE ANY ASSIGNMENT NOTICE , BE IT EQUITABLE OR ABSOLUTE

Link to post
Share on other sites

So You Received A Claim Yesterday

 

Dont Panic

 

Do Nothing For The Time Being

 

You Have 14 Days To Acknowledge

 

Ill Be Back On Later As You Need To Send Hillesdens A Cpr Request

 

Ill Do It Later Or Can Some One Post It Up

Link to post
Share on other sites

right if im reading this correct- on the log from mbna on the 18/03/09 , time 17.49 it says default/timescale/sod , does that mean the default letter was typed up ? on my credit file it says default 03/2009 end 31/03/2009 , if thats right they havnt gave me 14 days ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there more to the "credit agreement" than you have posted in that image? If that really is all they have then it is rubbish.

 

Can you expand on why you think it's rubbish? Because it does contain the prescribed terms. http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/162851-consumer-credit-agreements-guide.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you expand on why you think it's rubbish? Because it does contain the prescribed terms. http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/162851-consumer-credit-agreements-guide.html

 

OK - looks like I should have gone to Specsavers, or chosen my words with more care. I felt that it looked incomplete. I see a non-existent Section 4 referenced in it. How much else is missing? If that doesn't matter, and all that does is the existence or not of the "prescribed terms" then I bow to your greater knowledge and experience.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...