Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

River Island ( store card)


merlin100
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4983 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

right, briefly. My son has had no income for nearly 2 years.

He cannot work due to a car accident and has been seeing a consultant for those 2 years.

I have managed to get him Housing and Council Tax benefit but nothing to live on, myself and his mother have been buying his food.

Last month I went with him to his doctors surgery and managed to get him a sick note for a month. This was posted Recorded Delivery but DWP denied ever receiving it. That may be true as I checked for a signature on the Royal Mail site and the trail stops at delivery to their Sheffield depot.

I have lodged a complaint.

 

Now the problem - he is being constantly hassled by River Island ( store card). He only owes them £358.

Does anyone think that after the above explanation, I stand a good chance of asking them to write this debt off?

And if so, how would I word it?

Dont think its worth a CCA request as he only took it out in 2008.

I could ask them to accept £1 a week, maybe even a month, but he genuinely has no income, so even to offer that small amount would be a contradiction to declaring that he has no income.

Any thoughts people?

Many thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If he is suffering financial hardship,then under Office of Fair Trading guidelines on debt collection,they should not be seeking to collect more than he can reasonably expect to afford.

You need to send an income and expenditure sheet and explain the circumstances in writing,making an offer that he can afford.

Who is chasing the arrears ?

Is it River Island or a collection agent ?

Its unlikely that they will consider writing off the debt.

Has there been any charges added over the account period for missed payments/late payments ?

If so it may be worth looking to ask for these back.

We need more info to advise further,but I am sure we can help you sort this out.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I Think a good idea to post about your issues with DWP in the benefits forum-theres some very good members there who can advise on this too.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Martin. Dwp issues already posted thanks.

First River Island started the threats, now Santander.

Not sure about charges etc - will have to look into that.

Sometime this year we are hoping his compensation claim will be settled ( already told it will be a substantial amount).

He obviously will pay it out of this, but we cannot say exactly when the claim will be settled.

My main concern is that Santander may ask for proof of no income - how do you prove something that doesnt exist?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that you need to look at the full extent of his indebtedness and not just deal with them one-by-one as they appear.

 

Go through everything and find out what he owes - then come back here.

 

Generally, do not expect these people to be prepared to write off debts because of this kind of story.

 

How long ago did he have the accident and whose fault was it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a point to add here.

 

With regard to 'compensation'. I am sure you will be aware of how the sum your son is claiming has been calculated.

 

I went through this when my daughter was unlawfully killed, and I can tell you that although you intend to pay his indebtedness out of this eventual sum, beware of 'everyone' trying to make a claim on this money.

 

Specifically, you will know that the amount awarded is ONLY to clear debts that have accumulated due to the accident, and to cover your sons' ongoing expenses in connection with the event (accident).

 

Do not let anyone bully you into paying amounts in full and leave nothing for the future. Peoples' 'take' on compensation is that this is a free amount of money for your son to spend at will, whilst you will know by the way it is calculated that it is not, and neither is it a 'private income', much of it will be to invest for his future.

 

Sorry if I sound as though I am 'preaching' but having been there, I can speak from personal experience.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bankfodder,

the accident was 2 1/2 years ago - well documented on another thread.

The other party was prosectuted for his actions ( my son was walking on the pavement and a little idiot thought it would be clever to mount the pavement in his car and run my son over - he suffered multiple injuries, but one in particular is permanent, an irrepairably shattered and painful ankle).

Apart from a small amount of rent and council tax ( thanks to DWP cock ups) the River Island card is all he has to deal with.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi all,

my son has Cohens after him with a CCJ Claim (Northampton) for £338.

 

He has had no income for well over a year now due to losing his job after a car accident and has been supported by myself, his mother and his girlfriend.

 

We have tried to sort this out

first with CL Finance

then with Cohens but no-one wants to know

- seems they would much rather prefer the CCJ.

 

 

They are aware he has no income ( although they would probably deny this now).

 

I could CPR them as a delaying tactic,

but the debt was only taken on by him just over 2 years ago

so all I will be doing is delaying the inevitable really.

 

Does anyone have any suggestions as to the best way to approach this?

I would rather try and get the CCJ Claim withdrawn.

 

Im thinking of offering Cohens £25 a month.

Does anyone think this would work or will Cohens still go ahead with the CCJ?

Thanks all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are right to avoid the CCJ. The problem you might have is that they won't accept the monthly payment offer from a 3rd party. There is no guarantee of payments continuing to be made.

 

If you can afford to pay off the total or a good chunk of it, I think that would be the only way.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have they issued a SD?

 

Have you anything in writing or has this all been over the phone?

£25 a month seems very very fair to me, esp as he has no income, is he on benefits at all? If so the maximum they will get out of hime should they go to court will be £1 a month, and I am very sceptical about them being able to get a CCJ for that piddling amount, it will cost just as much again to get it into the courts!

 

I think they are all bluster, unless of course they have already served the papers, then if so, you MUST put in a defence, and all they will get is £1 a month, greedy chancers.

You MUST keep everything in writing, if you send them an offer of £25 a month, send it to them recorded delivery so you know they received it, keep a copy of it and the receipt and printout of their signature when they received it, then if it does go to court your son will be able tp prove that he has offered payment but they have refused, therefore they are wasting the courts time.

 

If in the meantime, they have not issued papers, then IMO, if the debt is known and he agrees he does owe it, he should set up a "Standing Order" NOT a direct debit, and pay them £1 a month, they would find it extremely difficult for a judge to force an unemployed person to pay more than that, as he has no income.

Keep EVERYTHING in writing, and DO NOT talk to them on the phone EVER!

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you actually received a Summons or is this in the threatening stage.

 

If you have received a Summons, then you can go the CPR route, but I believe you would still need to enter a defence. If you have contacted the Court and acknowledged receipt and stated you will be entering a defence then this extends the time limit from, I believe 14 to 28 days for a defence to be entered.

 

This would indeed buy a little more time, time for you to gather together written proof that they have not accepted your offer of payment.

 

Once they see that you are not a walk over, then it is possible the claim will be dropped.

 

As I say I am no expert, but they will look silly in front of a Judge who, in all likely hood would only order payments of £1 per months, having refused your offer of £25 per month.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all and thanks for the quick replies.

Post, yes they have entered a claim, issue date 23/08/10. It says he has 14 days plus 5 to acknowledge or enter a defence.

Up to now hes been trying to deal with them by phone ( I knew nothing of this), so I know they will deny any attempt by him to resolve this. Is it too late to send a written offer?

Under these circumstances, is there anything I could hope to achieve by sending a CPR request?

I will send a letter today offering £25 a month on condition they withdraw the CCJ claim. Is that reasonable?

Link to post
Share on other sites

dca are not know to take installments

the problem you have is cl finance is part of a greater company called cattles they own cl finance as well as lewis dca to name but a few.

 

cattles is no longer trading and is in addministration so the likes of cl finance just want a debt secured by a ccj. makes it easier to sell that way

 

is this a loan

car finance

credit card debt

 

we have had quite a bit of experience with cl finance so all is not lost

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...