Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • They have defended the claim by saying that the job was of unsatisfactory standard and they had to call another carpenter to remedy. My husband has text messages about them losing the keys a second time and also an email. What do they hope to achieve??? Most importantly,  as far as I have seen online, now I need to wait for paperwork from the court, correct?
    • The Notice to Hirer does not comply with the protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule  4 . This is before I ask if Europarks have sent you a copy of the PCN they sent to Arval along with a copy of the hire agreement et. if they haven't done that either you are totally in the clear and have nothing to worry about and nothing to pay. The PCN they have sent you is supposed to be paid by you according to the Act within 21 days. The chucklebuts have stated 28 days which is the time that motorists have to pay. Such a basic and simple thing . The Act came out in 2012 and still they cannot get it right which is very good news for you. Sadly there is no point in telling them- they won't accept it because they lose their chance to make any money out of you. they are hoping that by writing to you demanding money plus sending in their  unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors that you might be so frightened as to pay them money so that you can sleep at night. Don't be surprised if some of their letters are done in coloured crayons-that's the sort of  level of people you will be dealing with. Makes great bedding for the rabbits though. Euro tend not to be that litigious but while you can safely ignore the debt collectors just keep an eye out for a possible Letter of Claim. They are pretty rare but musn't be ignored. Let us know so that you can send a suitably snotty letter to them showing that you are not afraid of them and are happy to go to Court as you like winning.  
    • They did reply to my defence stating it would fail and enclosed copies of NOA, DN Term letter and account statements. All copies of T&C's that could be reconstructions and the IP address on there resolves to the town where MBNA offices are, not my location
    • Here are 7 of our top tips to help you connect with young people who have left school or otherwise disengaged.View the full article
    • My defence was standard no paperwork:   1.The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 2. Paragraph 1 is noted. The Defendant has had a contractual relationship with MBNA Limited in the past. The Defendant does not recognise the reference number provided by the claimant within its particulars and has sought verification from the claimant who is yet to comply with requests for further information. 3. Paragraph 2 is denied. The Defendant maintains that a default notice was never received. The Claimant is put to strict proof to that a default notice was issued by MBNA Limited and received by the Defendant. 4. Paragraph 3 is denied. The Defendant is unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment allegedly served from either the Claimant or MBNA Limited. 5. On the 02/01/2023 the Defendant requested information pertaining to this claim by way of a CCA 1974 Section 78 request. The claimant is yet to respond to this request. On the 19/05/2023 a CPR 31.14 request was sent to Kearns who is yet to respond. To date, 02/06/2023, no documentation has been received. The claimant remains in default of my section 78 request. 6. It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of proof of assignment being sent/ agreement/ balance/ breach or termination requested by CPR 31.14, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to: (a) show how the Defendant entered into an agreement; and (b) show and evidence the nature of breach and service of a default notice pursuant to Section 87(1) CCA1974 (c) show how the claimant has reached the amount claimed for; and (d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim; 7. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed. 8. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer credit Act 1974. 9. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell and Hamptons


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4943 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Now I have the following letter, they have theusual may take court action but want to add £245 Interest Charges (50% of amount outstanding), £80 Court Fee's, £70 Solictors Fee's.

 

scan0013.jpg

 

They have had the Statue Barred Letter many times in the past, convienetly ignored and have been reported via consumer direct who have told me not to call them as they will take this as acknowledging the debt.

 

Can someone give me a link to the letter to send it a final time. Like others they have searched my file frequently, its in the region of one a month.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Link to the debt collector library of letters.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/resources/templates-library/86-debt-collectors

 

If you have advised them before and they have ignored you, there is a letter towards the bottom of the library list, which you may choose to use.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could always remind them that they've just lost a harassment case which has cost them over £2K and that you would be more than willing to bring about a similar action. ;)

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?p=3093861#post3093861

 

Also;

 

Ferguson v. British Gas Trading Ltd (2009) is relevant to cases like this - if Trading Standards are reluctant, draw their attention to this part of the judgment:

 

Sedley LJ:

:Parliament's intention in passing the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 was to criminalise the kind of serious and persistent unwarranted threat which is alleged here, giving a right of civil action as a fallback. In this situation it ought not to be left to hardy individuals to put their savings and homes at risk by suing. The primary responsibility should rest upon local public authorities which possess the means and the statutory powers to bring alleged harassers, however impersonal and powerful, before the local justices.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Link to the

debt collector
link3.gif
library of letters.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk...ebt-collectors

 

If you have advised them before and they have ignored you, there is a letter towards the bottom of the library list, which you may choose to use.

 

Will be something new for them to ignore

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would complain to the CRA's for allowing such a disreputable company to search your files without your permission so many times aswell, tell them you are seeking legal advice.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I am getting fed up with DCA's simply ignoring peoples letters, they claim that in February 2006 that I made a payment of £1.00 towards the account.

 

Back in February 2006 a letter was sent to them requesting a copy of the credit agreement and a £1 Postal Order was enclosed to cover the statutory charge, So now 4 years down the line they are deciding that this letter even with "I do not acknowledge any debt to you or any other company or organisation that you claim to represent" is my acknowledgement of the debt.

 

I need some help on how to get a copy of this so called letter they claim to have on file stating I accept the debt is mine.

 

Will it be best to ask them to prove I have acknowledged the debt.

 

Todays letter recieved

 

scan0014.jpg

 

Letter Text Sent 3rd Feb 2006

 

scan0015.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just send them a copy of your 2006 letter, confirming what the £1 was for. Tell them that if they continue to make false insertions, that you will report this to the OFT, to assist them with their research into looking at Lowells fitness to hold a licence.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send Sam Barnard a Letter Before Action, and tell her in no uncertain terms that if they fail to supply you with the CCA request, of which you have paid the statutory fee of £1 for, AND they do not return your postal order, you will report the matter to the Police for theft, and fraud by false representation,

quote the specific part of the fraud act,

2Fraud by false representation E+W+N.I.

 

(1)A person is in breach of this section if he—

 

(a)dishonestly makes a false representation, and

 

(b)intends, by making the representation—

 

(i)to make a gain for himself or another, or

 

(ii)to cause loss to another or to expose another to a risk of loss.

 

(2)A representation is false if—

 

(a)it is untrue or misleading, and

 

(b)the person making it knows that it is, or might be, untrue or misleading.

 

S2, they are attempting to make a monetary gain from you, in light of use the £1 PO for the CCA as a means to keep the debt alive, you should also note on the letter that you will have nothing further to do with a company that acts outside of the law, that you have made a complaint to the OFT & TS for investigation and that as you will not deal with them at all in the future including their numerous trading styles, they should pass this account back to the OC immediately, OR if they have bought the debt including the rights under the law of property act, they should stop all collection activity until the matter has been fully investigated by the OFT TS and the Police.

 

People are far too soft when these DCA's attempt to exploit the debtors lack of knowledge and commit fraud like this, if every one this happened too made the necessary complaints they would be reigned in a lot sooner.

 

http://www.consumerdirect.gov.uk/contact Give them a ring and tell them what lowlifes have done, and say that you want this to be fully investigated and not added to the pile, advise them that you are looking at making a formal complaint to your local Police also regarding the matter of fraud, see if they agree or not.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is what I have come up with so far

For the purposes of clarity and the avoidance of doubt, please take careful note of the following:

 

This letter does not acknowledge any debt owed to you or your affiliates, agents, owners or otherwise.

 

As you are more than aware the letter sent to you dated 3rd February 2006 was a request under the CCA and the £1 was the statutory fee as required by law.

 

It is very strange that you never replied to that letter but have waited 4 years to try and use this to your advantage i.e. fraudulently trying to obtain a monetary gain from me, in light of use the £1 PO for the CCA as a means to keep the debt alive,

 

2 Fraud by false representation

 

(1)A person is in breach of this section if he—

 

(a)dishonestly makes a false representation, and

 

(b)intends, by making the representation—

 

(i)to make a gain for himself or another, or

 

(ii)to cause loss to another or to expose another to a risk of loss.

 

(2)A representation is false if—

 

(a)it is untrue or misleading, and

 

(b)the person making it knows that it is, or might be, untrue or misleading.

 

I will have nothing further to do with a company that acts outside of the law I have already made a complaint to the OFT & TS for investigation and I am not willing not deal with yourselves at all in the future including under any other trading name.

 

Lowell should now pass this account back to the OC immediately, or if they have bought the debt including the rights under the law of property act, they should stop all collection activity until the matter has been fully investigated by the OFT TS and the Police.

I hope this letter makes my position COMPLETELY clear

Link to post
Share on other sites

Best to keep everything in the open so it gets as much attention and advice as possible, I will be back on later hopefully with a head that is working......

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

LETTER BEFORE ACTION

 

Ref Number.

Dear Sam Barnard,

I refer to the above account number which you insist is attributable to me.

 

I have no knowledge of any such debt, and in any case any debt I may have had, is Statute Barred under the limitations act, something which again, you choose to ignore.

In your letter dated the 28th August 2010, you incorrectly state that you received an 'attempted' payment of £1.00 on the 3rd February 2006.

My records show that this will have been the statutory fee required in request for a consumer credit agreement, of which the request clearly states what the enclosed payment is for.

Your statement that I "attempted" to make a payment is incorrect and a flagrant abuse of your position. As such I have informed the relevant agencies including, but not limited to, the Office of Fair Trading, Trading Standards, and the Finacial Ombudsman, to investigate your fraudulent claims.

 

For your failure to act lawfully and supply me with the CCA requested in February 2006, and failure to return the stautory fee, instead fraudulently using it against the alleged debt, I am gathering this evidence along with that you have previously sent, in order to take legal action against yourselves and make a formal complaint to the Police for offences committed under the Fraud Act 2006, namely S2.

 

For your repeated unauthorised and vexatious searches on my credit file, I have reported you to the Information Commisioners Office to investigate, this will also form part of my claim against yourselves for damages in relation to this matter.

 

I now require confirmation from yourself that by (DD/MM/YYY) you will have erased any entries you have made on my credit file, you will also return to me my statutory fee of £1.00 which you have fraudulently used in your attempt at keeping an alleged debt alive.

And finally, you will accept that this alleged debt is beyond the limitaion period and close your files accordingly.

I expect a response by the date mentioned above, if, you continue to pursue this matter I will instigate legal proceedings against yourselves and claim damages in relation to your conduct, time and expenses and stress caused in dealing with you in this matter.

I also reserve the right to make a formal complaint to the Police regarding the attempted fraud you allude to in your letter of the 28th August 2010.

 

I look forward to your prompt response and your confirmation that this will be the end of the matter after rectifying all of my concerns laid out above.

Sincerely.

(print name)

 

You 'could' send that, or edit it to suit, HOWEVER the threats of legal action should 'only' be made IF you intend to carry them out, as is the reporting them to the Police for fraud, you should definitely report this shower to the ICO/OFT/TS & FOS.

  • Confused 1

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sorry but this is too wordy and 'emotional' it also contradicts itself, the grammar and probably the spelling too need to be run through Word spell checker or similar.

 

If they receive this letter as it stands it will not be taken seriously, okay we know this is how they will treat it anyway, but don't give them a stick to beat you with.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sorry but this is too wordy and 'emotional' it also contradicts itself, the grammar and probably the spelling too need to be run through Word spell checker or similar.

If they receive this letter as it stands it will not be taken seriously, okay we know this is how they will treat it anyway, but don't give them a stick to beat you with.

 

OK please advise accordingly, how would you reply in respond in their feeble attempts to extort money from people?

If my poor grammar and spelling offend you, please rectify said sentences or paragraphs, the idea of this site is to assist and help those who are being threatened and harassed by those that know better, not for others/trolls/newbies to pick fault and attempt to ridicule those giving giving advise and assistance please stick to credit today where your uneducated comments will be better welcomed.

Edited by Bazooka Boo

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they receive this letter as it stands it will not be taken seriously.

Only because they cannot read it!

[i'm sorry but this is too wordy and 'emotional'/QUOTE]

Please don't apologise, (EDIT) ...if you tell them to break the words down in to tri-agrammes and bi-agrammes they must just be able to work it out!..

Edited by freakyleaky
Personal insults removed

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Look at your last two posts, they say nothing about me but a great deal about you.

 

I was only trying to help.

 

I tried to rewrite the letter in a coherent style but I gave up, it needed more time than I had.

 

I would not dream of criticising the way someone posts *here* asking for help, but a letter which you propose to send to someone who is unlawfully harassing you is a different matter. It needs to be well written and effective.

 

I have reported your two most recent posts to the mods as they do not help the OP and consist solely of a wildly inaccurate personal attack.

 

I realise you are probably under a lot of stress yourself.

Edited by sandalwood
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...