Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good Evening, I've got a fairly simple question but I'll provide some context incase needed. I've pursued a company that has operations in england despite them having no official office anywhere. I've managed to find a site they operate from and the papers there have been defended so I know they operate there. They've filed a defence which is honestly the worst defence ever, and despite being required to provide their witness evidence, they have not and have completely ignored the courts and my request for copies of it. I'm therefore considering applying to strike out their defence on the grounds the defence was rubbish and that they haven't provided any evidence for the trial. However, it has a trial date set for end of june, and a civil application wouldn't get heard until a week before then, so hardly worth it. However, my local court is very good at dealing with paper applications (i.e ones that don't need hearings, and frankly I think they are literally like 1-2 days from when you submit it to when a Judge sees it. I'm wondering if I can apply to strikeout a defence without a hearing OR whether a hearing is required for a strikeout application.   Thanks
    • I have just opened another bank acc with lloyds (i have a few already) After doing some research they may have some relation to tsb or be apart of the same group will this cause me issue if my salary is paid into my lloyds account? Also, if the debts do go into default and nothing is paid then after 6 years it all goes away? As the DCAs cannot do anything? I do want to start paying in like 3/4 months or do you advise I leave it if it goes into default? again sorry for all the questions, i am just processing everything
    • one reply only  follow post 2 of letter of claim <<clickme link. dx
    • Sorry, I got confused  Yes, it states all three   Thanks, 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lloyds current account SCM response for LLoyds CCA


scarydays
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5014 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have an account which is seriously in dispute (been waiting 5 months for them to act on my SAR). Moorcroft are pressing saying next step is court. Can they take an account in dispute to the court stage?

 

I would press back and tell them in no uncertain terms that as they are delaying with your legal request ( I assume theyve cashed your postal order or cheque?)

Any court proceedings will result in you reporting this to the court

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK - I'm very confused. Not sure what I should do next.

 

I sent a SAR to Lloyds in March for my current account with them. I have sent several follow-up letters, and letters to Moorcroft stating that the account is in serious dispute, but they still threaten to pursue me.

 

I received a letter of notification last week that info was waiting at a local branch for me to collect. I went there today and received a tiny envelope. I expected to collect a huge file - I have had this account for 5 years.

 

So I open the envelope and inside is a covering letter saying the enclosed information should meet my requirements under the Data Protection Act 1998.

 

So inside the envelope is a printout of a summary of contact made with me/or attempts to contact me by telephone, dated between 02/01/2010 an 26/02/2010 - and a series of 15 computer screen dumps kind of associated with the list.

 

However, the first thing I notice is, it's got nothing to do with my current account at all - but with my Lloyds credit card.

 

The next thing I notice is that I did a CCA request on the credit card (via SCM)- which is noted in the list of contact. There is then a note in the list to say no credit agreement exists so unenforceable. Then there is a note to say, don't bother informing her, just put the account on hold, and pass the £1 fee to banking!!!!

 

Is this for real?

 

What should I do? I have Moorcroft breathing down my neck threatening legal action if I don't cough up by yesterday - re my current account. And no response from my SAR of 23rd March - and obviously no return of my £10.

 

And I have blatant evidence of them avoiding the situation with regards to my Credit Card.

 

Any suggestions?

Link to post
Share on other sites

send failure to comply letter to lloyds

 

ignore moorcrap they can do nothing to you

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Typical story.

Lloyds seem to think that the DPA does not apply to them.

Under the act-anything provided should be clear and intelligible.

What temp/letter did you send them ?

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

"The next thing I notice is that I did a CCA request on the credit card (via SCM)- which is noted in the list of contact. There is then a note in the list to say no credit agreement exists so unenforceable. Then there is a note to say, don't bother informing her, just put the account on hold, and pass the £1 fee to banking!!!!"

 

 

Really ?????????

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is very interesting.

 

Would you mind send me an email at our admin address to discuss a way forward on this.

 

I think that this discovery has put you ina very good positon

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've also sent you an email. Check your junk/spam filders if you don't see it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

The next thing I notice is that I did a CCA request on the credit card (via SCM)- which is noted in the list of contact. There is then a note in the list to say no credit agreement exists so unenforceable.

 

This seems to be a regular entry for LTSB. Unfortunately [problem] seem to get away with virtually illegible application forms which DJs accept.

'due the age of yr a/c the docs you req are no lngr held. we therefre regret we are unable to process yr reqst.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Some advice please,

 

I have just had the following letter from SCM regarding a CCA request I made. They have supplied an "agreement" which I need to check the validity of. But they also say,

 

1. the bank is not required to keep a copy of the Default notice, this was sent to you on xx xxxx 2009

 

2 A formal demand was issued on xx xxxx 2009 and this is the termination notice.

 

3 There is no notice of assignment of the debt as it has not been sold.

 

Are all of the above correct?

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some advice please,

 

I have just had the following letter from SCM regarding a CCA request I made. They have supplied an "agreement" which I need to check the validity of. But they also say,

 

1. the bank is not required to keep a copy of the Default notice, this was sent to you on xx xxxx 2009 generally, they don't keep copies of anything sent, it s/b all logged.

2 A formal demand was issued on xx xxxx 2009 and this is the termination notice. a formal demand for the full bal is generally regarded as termination. did they confirm in writing that their 'formal demand' is termination?

 

3 There is no notice of assignment of the debt as it has not been sold. correct, if it is still with the o/c then no 'assignment' has taken place.

 

Are all of the above correct?

 

Many thanks

 

IMO

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...