Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Just to clear it up, sorry I don't make sense sometimes. I have paid £4000 £1200 of that was suppose to clear the £1200 debt.   Meaning I have sent a extra £2800 on top of my normal mainternance money.   Thank you
    • Try CPR 31.15 Possibly but a party is not compelled to disclose any documents pre allocation
    • Hi, I shown my key worker a letter that was sent to me saying that I owe £1200, she setup a standing order around 2021, this was to pay back money I owed, with my mental health status I have had complex issues to deal with and I just simply forgot about this standing order so it has been running for about 3.5 years acording to my key worker, anyway I'm not worried about the money that was sent that I call a overpayment, it went towards supporting my child's household so I am just happy with that, I am a little sad that I am being told I still owe this £1200, I have sent bank statements over 3 years worth but they have not taken away this £1200 bill and still say I owe it   Thank you
    • She did try contacting EON in the early days of the debt but they refused to speak to her because she could not pass the security checks. She didn't know the answers on an account she hadn't opened?   I also saw this article recently which could be what has happended here: Debt collection agencies in the UK are using fair means or foul to link people to an address where an unpaid debt has been run up, sometimes years after they have moved out The Guardian Anna Tims Mon 22 Apr 2024 The letter from the debt collection agency arrived out of the blue, and it was intimidating. It informed Joshua Simpson* that he owed £2,212 to Octopus Energy, and accused him of ignoring previous requests to settle the bill. If he did not stump up within 14 days, he was told, further action would be taken to recover the money. Simpson checked his Octopus account – it was in credit. Then he noticed the address where the debt had been accrued between 2022 and 2023. It was his childhood home – which his family had sold 18 years previously. "Since I was only 16 when we left the property, I was astonished that they'd linked my name [to it]," he says. "The debt collection agency insisted I provide a tenancy agreement to prove how long I've lived at my current address. I couldn't, since we bought our home. "They are now actively pursuing me for this debt, causing me a huge amount of stress. We are about to remortgage, and if this debt prevents us switching to a better deal, we will face real financial hardship." Simpson had been sucked into the shadowy world of "identity tracing", whereby investigators recruited by creditors seek to locate individuals who have moved home without paying their bills. It is an unregulated sector where anyone can set up as an agent in a back room without a licence, or scrutiny, and use fair means or foul to identify debtors. Reputable companies join a trade association that operates a code of practice, but membership is not mandatory, and mistakes are common. Last year, a teenage boy was chased for a debt of more than £900 by debt collectors acting for the energy company Ovo. A "trace agent" had somehow linked him to the debt because his parents had previously rented the property in question. An investigation by the Observer established that the debt had been run up by a subsequent tenant. The consequences of mistaken identity can be catastrophic. Individuals who are erroneously linked to a debt face, at worst, court action, bailiffs and a ruined credit rating. At best, they can endure weeks of stress and paperwork in order to prove they are not the debtor. It is estimated that 20m identity traces are made in the UK every year, many on behalf of companies that are owed money. Personal data is often obtained from credit reference agencies, which record applications for credit, and details are supposed to be verified with several different sources before being used for debt enforcement. In practice, however, this does not always happen. Simpson's details had been passed along a chain of intermediaries before the demand was issued. Octopus had given the unpaid account to a debt collection agent, which had contracted a tracing service, GBG, to find the debtor................ Full Article: https://www.theguardian.com/money/2023/oct/04/a-cry-for-help-energy-providers-play-the-villain-in-dramas-to-chill-the-blood ..............The Financial Ombudsman Service, which investigates complaints about financial firms, states that debt collection agents have to produce convincing evidence to link an individual to a debt, rather than rely on names, addresses and birth dates. According to the trade association, the Institute of Professional Investigators, an unknown number of investigators and trace agents are operating below the radar. Many more are merely inept, as data protection compliance training is not mandatory. "We have been campaigning for many, many years to try to get all private investigators regulated," says secretary general Glyn Evans.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Unpaid Fare Notice, Virgin Trains, Lost 16-25 railcard on way to train


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5016 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello Everyone

 

On july 5th I travelled to manchester with a young persons ticket (virgin trains). I had purchased a 16-25 railcard on the 4th of july.

 

Sometime between collecting my ticket and boarding the train I lost my 16-25 railcard. When asked to produce it I was unable to do so and was issued with the unpaid fares notice. For £146 for one way, my original return ticket was for £43.

 

On the return journey, the same thing happened, and i received another unpaired fares notice for £146.

 

I am currently able to show the stamped receipt (showing railcard number my name and date of purchase) and the purchase receipt for the 16-25 railcard. I showed the train manager my driving licence and he took down the number on the unpaid fare notice so I am able to prove that the receipts for the 16-25 railcard are mine. (i.e. the person travelling that day when the unpaid fare was issued)

 

I appealed the notices straight away, posted first class on the 6th of july. with copies of the 16-25 railcard stamped leaflet stub/receipt and purchase receipt. As well as copies of the unpaid fare notices and tickets and my driving license. To the revenue protection support services.

 

I have received no response to this. On the 29th of July I received instead 2 demands for £146 each. With 14 days to pay it from the 27th of July (the date quoted on the letter) before a further £20 is added to each fine.

 

I understand there is a need to prevent fare evasion. But I believe it is clear that this was not what I was doing, and that I am able to prove this.

 

I bought the railcard to save money as I am a student who after 5 years of study and with one still left to go has a debt of about £35,000.

 

I feel the fine is unfair as I was the victim of honest misfortune rather than someone trying to defraud the system, and am able to prove this.

 

I also think that it is unfair that they have ignored my appeal letter for 24 days and counting and have instead issued me with a threat to pay within 14 days of their letter (dated the 27th, but received on the 29th).

 

Thanks in advance for any help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

p.s. the unpaid fare notice told me to appeal to the Revenue Protection Support Services, which is what I did. And it is this the same 'company' that sent me the demand for £146 x 2. To be paid within 14 days

Edited by vp_99
spelling error
Link to post
Share on other sites

unfortunately the Terms and Conditions of your railcard make it clear that the railcard must be produced when requested in order to validate a discounted ticket, if you don't then you are treated as having no ticket, its all there in the agreement that you signed when you bought the railcard, surely after getting a UFN on the out journey would it not have been sensible to go and excess your return ticket before making the return journey? then you'd only have had to pay the difference between the fare paid and the correct fare?

Views expressed in this forum by me are my own personal opinion and you take it on face value! I make any comments to the best of my knowledge but you take my advice at your own risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am aware of what the T&Cs say. But i didn't lose my Railcard on purpose.

And I am able to prove that I had one that covered the ticket. I didn't pay extra because I believed I had grounds for appeal, and I am aware that once these companies have your money its difficult/impossible to get it back.

 

Am also aware of the fact that despite the RPSS trying to proclaim that they are an independent body, they are in fact funded by the train companies, and are infact a collection agency.

 

Also RPSS stands for revenue protection support service. How is the extortion of money from a passenger who had paid for their ticket in full, but then lost their railcard (which they are still able to prove they have purchased) protecting revenues?

 

p.s. please don't refer me to the T&Cs again, I am aware of what they say. I believe that the fare is unfair and would like advice on how to pursue this, other than the RPSS appeals service which seems to be ignoring my letter and evidence and setting deadlines to try and cajole me into paying them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you don't have grounds for appeal though, you breached the T&C's that YOU agreed to, UFN appeals are not dealt with by the Independent Penalty Fare Appeals service as they are not Penalty Fares, a UFN is issued when a fare is due not as a "Penalty", good luck but your best bet is just to pay up or write to Virgin Trains customer services dept and see if you get any joy with them, good luck but legally you are pretty bang to rights as harsh as it may seem.

Views expressed in this forum by me are my own personal opinion and you take it on face value! I make any comments to the best of my knowledge but you take my advice at your own risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately I cannot really offer you much different advice to that given by RPI.

 

The TOC was not in breach of the T&Cs, however, through misfortune on the first journey, you were and I could see a case for the TOC to accept that this was an unitentional situation and waive the charge for the first journey.

 

However, there is no case to do so on the second journey. Even if you had not recalled the terms & conditions from the time of purchase, you knew that you could not use the ticket without being able to show a valid railcard on your return journey because you had been issued an unpaid fare notice on the outward trip.

 

The simplest (and probably cheapest) thing to have done would have been to buy a new railcard before making the return journey, thus validating your ticket. You could at least then have shown that you made every effort to avoid the problem and applied for a refund of one railcard charge.

 

I suggest that you might write to Virgin and note that you were also inconvenienced by circumstances beyond your control. Ask if they will waive the fare due on the first notice, giving that explanation, but accepting and paying the second notice might be a good idea.

 

It is a harsh lesson perhaps, but there is a strict liability requirement that the Railcard is shown to validate any discounted ticket and if not, the traveller will be treated as if no ticket is held.

 

Whatever our personal opinion, that needs to be set aside and we have to recognise that if Virgin don't agree to waive or reduce the charge, failing to pay could become much more expensive in the long-run.

 

I don't say it's morally right, but that is the position in accordance with the rules in force.

 

Good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the replies.

 

 

Is there a rules and regulations booklet for unpaid fares notices?

 

the national rail conditions of carriage give no information on appeals or any code of conduct for the issue of an unpaid fare notice?

 

thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

The simple answer to that one is 'No'.

 

Although the TOCs may issue an Unpaid Fare Notice, they are not obliged to do so for the following reasons:

 

1. Where pre-purchase facilities are available, every traveller has a strict liability requirement to show a valid ticket on demand in compliance with National Railway Byelaws and the National Conditions of Carriage

 

2. Where pre-purchase facilities were not available, the correct fare is due at the time of travel and not later

 

Some TOCs allow the issue of an Unpaid Fare Notices (UFN) to resolve disputed issues, but that is a matter for their management and they could always proceed to issue a Summons alleging a Byelaw offence instead.

 

UFNs are not covered by the Penalty Fares appeals procedure and the Independent Penalty Fares Appeals Service has no formal authority to comment on UFNs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The difference between UFN's and Penalty Fares is that a Penalty fare can be disputed on various grounds such as a ticket machine being broken etc, etc, but a UFN is issued in circumstances when a person is travelling with no ticket/invalid ticket but does not have the means to pay or refuses to pay therefore if a UFN is issued then an offence has been committed, a UFN is not a penalty it is simply a bill to pay the outstanding Anytime single fare that was payable at the time.

Views expressed in this forum by me are my own personal opinion and you take it on face value! I make any comments to the best of my knowledge but you take my advice at your own risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...