Jump to content
  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • To me, it isn't just about social distancing and hygiene measures. I'm far from the first to say it but until there's a reliable track and trace system, I don't think this can be managed properly.   Children may not suffer as much as adults, although some do, they can be asymptomatic and pass on the virus to the rest of the family.   https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/uk-news/lockdown-david-king-second-wave-18739973
    • When will most schools actually re-open in September ?   And when they open, will they be providing teaching over the number hours 9am to 3pm  ?   I am thinking of the school I attended, which was a large Victorian building, with many modern extensions.  The classrooms which could accommodate about 35 Children elbow to elbow, will only be able to accommodate 20 at the most with any reasonable distancing.   Or does the whole class  of say 35 stay in a bubble and the teachers move around to teach the different subjects ?    I can see many schools opening later in September, not for all pupils for all days and not doing the full hours.   This is going to be very difficult to manage for all those concerned, including parents looking to return to work.     
    • Hi.   If you do a search of our forums you will find other people who've had trouble with Marquis. Sadly people don't always update their threads with the final result.   Scroll up this page to the red strip at the top, and type Marquis into the white search box on the right.   HB
    • I think independent assessments and quotations will be essential. Once again please monitor this thread for a for the reply later on or tomorrow
    • We'd love to return it but from everything I've read it would a long drawn out business so keeping it would probably be simpler.   I think we are going to give them a chance to sort the heating/hot water.We've got very squeaky brakes now which my local garage is going to look at a week on Monday. I'm saving all receipts etc. I'd also like to charge them for fuel used and my time doing what they should have done.   The time they take to get anything done is what is bothering me. If I choose to go somewhere else for a repair for anything would I be able to charge Marquis or do I have to continue using their warranty   I hadn't thought of getting an independent assessment, not sure how you go about it but I'll look into it. Thanks for the reply  
  • Our picks

    • Curry’s cancelled my order but took the money anyway. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/423055-curry%E2%80%99s-cancelled-my-order-but-took-the-money-anyway/
      • 11 replies
    • Father passed away - Ardent Credit Services (Vodafone) now claiming he owes money. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/423040-father-passed-away-ardent-credit-services-vodafone-now-claiming-he-owes-money/
      • 9 replies
    • Currys Refuse Refund F/Freezer 5day old. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422656-currys-refuse-refund-ffreezer-5day-old/
      • 6 replies
    • Hi,  
      I was in Sainsbury’s today and did scan and shop.
      I arrived in after a busy day at work and immediately got distracted by the clothes.
       
      I put a few things in my trolley and then did a shop.
      I paid and was about to get into my car when the security guard stopped me and asked me to come back in.
       
      I did and they took me upstairs.
      I was mortified and said I forgot to scan the clothes and a conditioner, 5 items.
      I know its unacceptable but I was distracted and Initially hadn’t really planned to use scan and shop.
       
      No excuse.
      I offered to pay for the goods but the manager said it was too late.
      He looked at the CCTV and because I didn’t try to scan the items he was phoning the police.
       
      The cost of the items was about £40.
      I was crying at this point and told them I was a nurse, just coming from work and I could get struck off.
       
      They rang the police anyway and they came and issued me with a community resolution notice, which goes off my record in a year.
      I feel terrible. I have to declare this to my employer and NMC.
       
      They kept me in a room on my own with 4 staff and have banned me from all stores.
      The police said if I didn’t do the community order I would go to court and they would refer me to the PPS.
       
      I’m so stressed,
      can u appeal this or should I just accept it?
       
      Thanks for reading 
      • 16 replies
myusername

Pastdue Credit Solutions

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 3621 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

I received a letter today dated the 26th July stating, this is a formal demand.

 

scan0011.jpg

 

Their client is British Gas Residential and they claim I owe a sum of just under £800 for a property I lived at nearly five years ago.

 

Whilst I lived at that property my energy bills were handled by Npower and have never recieved a bill from British Gas, confusingly nothing with regards to this has ever shown up on my credit file.

 

I would be pretty sure if I had a debt of this amount British Gas would have contacted me whilst I lived there or tracked me down straight after it seems very strange to wait so long.

 

So I am not sure were to proceed with this, have had a browse on here and found this letter which might be worth sending.

 

Any help and advice would be greatly appreciated

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anthrax alert at debt collectors caused by box of doughnuts

 

Make sure you do not post anything which identifies you. Although we can remove certain things from the site unless it's done in a timely manner everything you post will appear in Google cache & we do not have any control over that.

 

Vir prudens non contra ventum mingit

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

17 Port & Maritime Regiment RCT

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My daughter had something very similar a while ago and it turned out that although she was paying her combined account through a key meter, only the electricity had actually been paid and nothing had been credited for 2 years to the gas account. It took British Gas 2 years to notice this and we are still fighting!


Every journey begins with a single step :):)

 

Please note: I have no qualifications in this area - my advice is learned from the wonderful members of this Forum. Thanks to you all for your help.

 

If you have found my post helpful please leave a short message by clicking the star to the left of my profile - Thank You

 

The only person entitled to your Personal Finance details is a Judge not a DCA

 

Move all banking activity to another banking group if you have a dispute - your funds can be used to offset debts within the same group.

Be careful with Banking details (card/account numbers) as these can be used to take unauthorised payments.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would follow the advice given on the rest of the thread you mentioned.

 

i've had a similiar issue, but from moorcroft in relation to a britishgas account.

I contacted moorcroft to get further details, then contacted BG to enquire. No outstanding accounts with them - fully paid up.

 

so sent a proove it letter to moorcroft - not heard anything since.


[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sent the prove it letter today, will see what develops

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So a month has passed and they have sent my account to another debt collector.

 

This letter was sent to Pastdue on 2nd August 2010

 

scan0004.jpg

 

 

This Letter has been recieved today from Scotcall Debt

 

scan0001.jpg

 

 

So much for a DCA to pay any attention to the letters they recieve, shall I just send the first letter above to the new DCA. On a seperate note they are sending letters to a Ms and I am a Mr does this have any effect.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some thoughts on Ducks, donkeys, tails, and scams....

 

I am aware of someone who received a letter from Past Due Credit Solutions Limited (Registered in Scotland No. 287794) and it reads thus;

 

"I would be grateful if you could conatact me on 0844 559 8349 regarding an important matter.

The office hours are ..{blah blah}

Your Assistance is appreciated."

 

It caused the recipient some anxiety and it does me too, not for what it says, but for the irrational reason of what it does not say.

 

First thing, I advised the recipient resist the temptation to contact Past Due Credit Solutions Limited. (PDCS)

Via the letterhead and the PDCS web homepage I had the impression that PDCS were a debt collection company pursuing a debt but the nature of the letter made me suspicious.The recipient and I still had anxieties though. This was plain silly.

 

If I were to walk by a pond, hear a "quack" and see something that looks like a duck would I get stressed wondering what I had just seen? Of course not, I would accept I had just seen a duck.

 

I figured the most likely explanation was that PDCS, whether bona fide or not, were fishing.

 

If you get a letter like this alert yourself to the likelihood that you have seen something that looks like a [problem], and reads like a [problem], so it could well be a [problem]. Proceed with great caution on the basis that the approach could be genuine, but because it falls well sort of genuine, satisfactory, and professional practice and therefore gives excellent reason to be sceptical. Print this thread, take it and your letter, then seek advice from the Citizens Advice Bureau (CAB) or call at the constituency office of your MP. You could even call at your local County Court and they will clarify watt law may apply and advise you on your rights. Do not telephone PDCS. If you cannot ignore the letter simply reply by letter that you have no idea what they are talking about. Reveal nothing that they don't already know about you. That's what I advised my friend to do, but before we got around to that, ...

 

A couple of days later my friend received another envelope also bearing a Clydebank frank-stamp. There were two letters in the envelope. One had the look of being from an energy supplier and the other from a third party with a box number adresss in Nottingham and no registered address or company number declared on the letterhead. My friend now has three letters.

 

Between the letters is an attempt to get my friend to pay off an alleged debt arising form (it appears) energy supply to an address from where she has twice removed and last lived at seven years ago. All final accounts were settled and mail was diverted for twelve months. Yet out of the blue (seemingly) she has a letter from an energy company which says they have been trying to get in contact to "settle a final balance of £XX.pp." The hell they have!

 

My friend did once reside at the address in question. For all we know there may well be an outstanding balance or a CCJ pertaining to that address. However, my friend is certain that no bad debt is attributable to her because all acounts at that address were legitimately held in a completely different name. The once fashionable childrens party game of game of pin the tail on the donkey springs to mind.

 

For all I know PDCS could have a legitimate business. However, if the letters are read carefully there are anomalies, errors and inconsistencies. Furthermore, it would be possible for scamsters to entirely fabricate the case that these three letters conspire to make against my friend from records and databases that are not that difficult to access.

 

But despite there being three letters and and there being an implication that my friend owed money to an energy supplier there is no explicit declaration to clarify the following;

 

  1. The account number with the energy supplier
  2. The date the account was created or opened, in whose name, and upon what authority

  3. What goods or services were provided
  4. The period, or date, of supply

  5. The date the alleged final bill was issued
  6. and the date the final bill fell due

My friend has written to PDCS asking for documentary evidence to answer all of the above. She has been careful to reveal nothing about herself that PDCS don't already know.

 

Something else is inferred in the letters. There is a suggestion that the alleged debt has been sold by the energy company to the third party and that the third party is "..now the data contoller of your personal data in the records of this account. We are a company which purchases debts from other organisations. [.. ..] Your peronal data will be used for the purpose of collecting the outstanding balance from you." This is nothing but twaddle intended to play on the readers' fears and fuel anxiety.

 

If details of an alleged debt have been sold then the energy supplier will, after the elapse of time have written off the debt for accounting purposes. It is not implausible that 'bundles' of cold case debt data files may have been sold by an energy supplier for a fraction of their worth to a third party. But, according to the letter(s), the energy company has "assigned all of its' respective rights, title ande interst in respect of the above referenced account (including the right to recieve paymentof the outstanding balance)"

 

So, if the above is true, and I remain open to the possibility that it is not, then even if my friend were to pay the alleged outstanding balance then the payment would not go to settle the alleged debt with the energy supplier. The sale of the data of the old debt for pence, if it actually happened, merely converts the alleged debt into a commodity which, if people are gullible enough, can be converted into an income stream for PDCS.

 

Between the three letters there are several anomalies, spelling mistakes, grammatical errors, and typosthat ought not appear in legitimate correspondence from suitably respectable, professional and legitimate debt recovery companies. Anomalies, spelling mistakes, grammatical errors, and typos do however appear in scams.Think back to that duck ..

 

Trust your instincts, if it looks like a [problem] and reads like a [problem] then in all probality it is a [problem].

 

My friend is clear in her mind that she will only deal with these people in writing, she will not reveal anything they do not already know, she will quote her name and address exactly as they do complete with the errors, she has said she disputes any suggestion she is responsible for the alleged debt, she wants explicit clarification upon the six points listed above, and she wants to recive documentary evidence (such as copy of the bill and agreement) to prove the alleged debt. I do not expect she will receive anything back.

 

After my friend vacated her former address people that followed could have left leaving a bill unpaid and details of that debt could be in the public domain. Via files held by consumer credit reference agencies my fireinds links with her present address and her former addresses can be linked. I have given my friend my opinion. I have said that in all probability PDCS are playing a game of pin a tail on a donkey. Remember, PDCS and the alleged third party are in this to produce an income stream. Nothing that is recovered will be passed to the creditor (the energy supplier) so it cannot be debt recovery. The incentives for PDCS or whoever would answer the telephone are not to recover debt for the energy supplier but to produce an income stream for themselves. So, will it still concern them that the payment should be received from the right person?

 

In my humble and unqaulified opinion and in all probability, "the game that PDCS is playing with you is to pin a tail on any donkey," I told my friend.

 

My friend conducts her affairs responsibly. She has covered herself. She has stated in writing she disputes any suggestion that she is responsible for the inferred alleged debt and she has asked for documetary evidence.

 

Together we faced the anxieties that these letters produced, rationalised our concerns, then turned our fears around to make the case that PDCS have fabricated look silly.

 

Like Harry Potter we confronted a demon and cast a spell, "RIDICOROUS !!"

 

For all I know PDCS may well have a legitimate side to their business.

 

But if you receive correspondence from PDCS, or any other company for that matter, that has smiilar hallmarks as I have described above then try not to be overly worried as it has the hallmarks of a con. Dispute it, reveal nothing, do not make contact in any other way than writing, ask what was supplied and when, ask for the coressponding meter readings if applicable, ask for a copy of a bill, ask for documentary evidence, and then expect to hear nothing more.

 

Above all, conduct your affairs responsibly, if you get into arrears and difficulties seek professional and unbiased advice early, don't let overdue accounts snowball, keep records, and keep them where you can find them even seven years on.

 

If my friend could quicky restore her memory who was her energy supplier seven years ago she could quickly put her mind at rest.

She has a temptation to telephone PDCS and ask what was supplied. She would love for PDCS to answer, "GAS". (There never was, nor is it likely now, any gas service to that property.)

 

We hope PDCS will go away, go forth, but we pray to our God that they do not multiply.

 

Hard as it is to make a living, whatever your beliefs, do only unto others as you would have others do unto you.

 

God bless

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...