Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Another one. Apparently this has been hushed up for about three months. They're working through their majority quite fast with all the sackings. Not that they've done anything about Menzies yet but he sounds like a blackmail risk. Here's the original article.   Revealed: Tory MP allegedly demanded campaign cash to pay ‘bad people’ ARCHIVE.PH archived 18 Apr 2024 07:32:33 UTC  
    • and another one   MP Mark Menzies loses Tory whip as party investigates claims he misused funds The Fylde MP is alleged to have used campaign funds to pay off ‘bad people’ and cover medical expenses Never mind losing whip - how about criminal charges   MP Mark Menzies loses Tory whip as party investigates claims he misused funds WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK The Fylde MP is alleged to have used campaign funds to pay off ‘bad people’ and cover medical expenses According to the The Times, £14,000 given by donors for use on Tory campaign activities was transferred to Mr Menzies’ personal bank accounts and used for private medical expenses. The MP, who is one of Rishi Sunak’s trade envoys, is also said to have called his 78-year-old former campaign manager at 3.15am one day in December, claiming he was locked in a flat and needed £5,000 as a matter of “life and death”. The sum, which rose to £6,500, was eventually paid by his office manager from her personal bank account and subsequently reimbursed from funds raised from donors   "According to a source close to Mr Menzies, the MP had met a man on an online dating website and gone to the man’s flat, before subsequently going with another man to a second address where he continued drinking. He was sick at one point and several people at the address demanded £5,000, claiming it was for cleaning up and other expenses."   Hes supposed to use funding from Taxpayers and doners for a life of service, not funding a life of drink and debauchery Hope his parliamentary expenses are also investigated.   In fact, perhaps Mr Bates next role in life should be as an independent investigator of Parliamentary expenses?
    • He asked for that one, didn't he?
    • Trump was unable to make it through the first day of court without falling asleep on Monday, which sparked a whole host of jokes, memes and even a new nickname, 'Dozy Don'    
    • The shift to card and contactless technology in the past decade has been rapid - not just in Britain, but in all sorts of remote pockets of the world. This is yet a further sign of it.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

How do you like it now Lloyds!?


cantsay
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6288 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This is probably why you did not get a response, claim forms should be addressed to their registered office in London.

 

If you attempt to enforce it, it is highly likely judgement will be set aside, i.e. the judgement becomes a nullity. This will delay you by a few months. Obviously if Lloyds pay up then these points are irrelevant.

 

I will come back to you later when I have a little more time with a positive way forward.

If I have been helpful please click on my star and add a comment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually , I looked at my form and it wasnt that address it was Customer Services recovery ,charlton place , Andover. Also it was one that was offered as an address by the court.Also, the court didnt mention anything about that and the onus on the bank, when they receive official court docs must be to ensure they get to the right dept surely! Not just ignore them and not respond to any letters from myself which have all been sent recorded delivery.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just been on phone to the court, GuidoT , and they confirm that your point is wrong. The Bank have had the docs and they havent responded, the onus is on them, he said I could apply the warrant without fear of the bank saying "You sent it to the wrong address we want judgement set aside"

Link to post
Share on other sites

The court staff have no legal training, should not be giving out advice (save on administrative matters) and often misinform people.

 

However, who you listen to is your prerogative.

If I have been helpful please click on my star and add a comment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not saying they are not be trusted per se, but they often misinform (not deliberately), however they are usually fine with administrative type matters.

 

See post 2 of the link below regarding the difficulties relating to default judgement:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloyds-bank/61649-issuing-request-judgement-want.html

 

As I promised in post 27, here is something a little more positive (if you want to listen to me that is).

 

I would write to Lloyds' registered office as below (and it should find its way to SCM) saying I have judgement in default, pay up in 14 days or I will take steps to enforce. That way they may pay up or alternatively in the event you do enforce then you can show the judge that you also took reasonable steps to bring the matter to the Lloyds attention and provided them with a warning.

 

Lloyds TSB Bank Plc

25 Gresham Street

London

EC2V 7HN

 

Others may have different views and consider a more aggressive approach appropriate.

If I have been helpful please click on my star and add a comment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I appreciate what your saying. As to bringing the matter to their attention! I think the registered letters and emails I've exchanged with them over the past few months may have given them a clue! As well as the official court doc's theyve had. I, as has nearly everyone dealing with Lloyds has had to bend over backwards to make sure we do things by the book and give them every opportunity to settle, but they take the pi**. The court has said I can enforce judgement and thats what I'm going to try to do. Why should I give them even more time. As the judge said in Kazzaws case, they have settled every single other case are are abusing not only court time, but my time as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...