Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Dear Sir/Madam, TFL case number: **** I would like to thank TFL for providing me the opportunity to explain my behaviour. I realised the stupidity of what I have done and wish to seek a resolution to this matter. I have no valid excuse for this action and I am extremely sorry and deeply regret my action. I hope you will accept my sincere apologies. Nothing can justify my action. I am aware that TFL are only able to operate if everyone pays their fare correctly and I feel so guilty about attempting to breach public trust. This has caused me sleepness nights and raised my anxieties. I have history of anxiety. This has been a hard lesson learnt. I have never been in trouble with the law in the past and I ensure that I won’t be in the future. I am and will be using my oyster card (PAYG). I would like to humbly appeal to TFL to allow me to settle this matter out of court and avoid going to prosecution given the adverse consequences it can have on me and my family. I am very concerned that prosecution for the first time and I would like to make restitution for my action. Having a criminal offense on my record will have detrimental consequences on me. I have always been a law abiding person and have no previous offences. I would really appreciate if I can be given the opportunity to pay for any unpaid fares plus any charges and/or administrative cost which have been incurred by TFL due to this incident. I am sincerely remorseful and ashamed of myself, and I fully appreciate the severity and stupidity of my transgressions. Again, I would like to offer my sincerest apologies. Yours Faithfully, My Name
    • the date is 19/04/24, so i have until 29/4/24 to reply? Yes, i will send my draft of my begging letter   
    • use the webform if it allows you to attach your evidential documents then do so but do that later depending upon who your bank is.... - but i suspect you will be referred to Mastercard. who is your bank? dx    
    • If i did it through the bank, they seem to have an online form. I wondered if this is the best way or to do a letter, add supporting documents and send them through the post, recorded delivery  ?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Changed status of car park


Belaflat
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5014 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have a vehicle which I sorned at the beginning of this month. It is parked on a car park on a dock estate. The entrance to the estate states it is private land and there are barriers manned by security at the entrance.

Cut to the chase, I have just had a phone call telling me that ABP have allowed the DVLA jurisdiction on the estate and they have started towing away untaxed vehicles. Mine is still there but apparantly will be removed tomorrow.

This has got me worried as I believed that a private car park was not a public road and certainly not on an estate which is marked as private and secure. although the vehicle is in effect a scrapper, I left it there until I had time to remove some items before disposing of it. This car park is the one used by a dock pub which i frequent and a lot of us have had no problems over the years with similar activities.

What is likely to be my position, will they attempt a fine...how can a car park become a public road without any visible warning.

Its not the thought of losing my old vehicle thats annoying but the prospect of legal action when I have done what i thought was legal all along.

Of course I will pay you everything you say I owe with no proof.

Oooh Look....Flying Pigs

Link to post
Share on other sites

What...nobody any ideas...?

 

As a further update, I have had the vehicle towed to a definite off road storage area but after checking online, the DVLA have it down as unlicensed.

 

I am assuming they will now hit me with a penelty for back tax which I intend to challenge on the issues raised in my first post...anyone have any thoughts on this.

 

I should add, they accepted the SORN originally and I have the letter to show this.

Of course I will pay you everything you say I owe with no proof.

Oooh Look....Flying Pigs

Link to post
Share on other sites

DVLA contractors can remove vehicles from there that are not licensed or have a current SORN declaration and I would think that they are the ones that they are removing. As it is not a public road, your SORN declaration will be valid.

 

If your SORN declaration started on expiry of the last licence, you have no tax liability.

Link to post
Share on other sites

RayKay..they have removed a vehicle that I know was Sorned, I know the owner. He has had a letter telling him where it is impounded.

Apparently, the only reason they didnt take mine was it was too big for the truck they had at the time.

I declared sorn correctly, believing the car park was private for the reasons stated. DVLA have apparently cancelled this status as it looks like they are alleging use on a public road..ie...the car park.

Of course I will pay you everything you say I owe with no proof.

Oooh Look....Flying Pigs

Link to post
Share on other sites

DVLA cannot change the 'status' of the car park, it is in the Vehicles Excise & Registration Act 1994 that a registered vehicle must be licensed, but if it is not kept on a public road - a road maintained at public expense (a road, not a car park) - a SORN declaration may be made instead of a licence.

 

As it is not on a public road, what the contractors should do is check the status of each vehicle with DVLA before dealing with it. Sounds like they are not checking and just taking everything.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the car park has barriers then it is not accesable as a public right of way so your car cannot be removed by the DVLA as long as it is SORNd.

 

As Rakay says, the DVLA cannot change the status of a car park. For SORN not to be valid, your car would have to be parked on a public road.

 

__________________

Please Note

 

The advice I offer will be based on the information given by the person needing it. All my advice is based on my experiences and knowledge gained in working in the motor and passenger transport industries in various capacities. Although my advice will always be sincere, it should be used as guidence only.

 

I would always urge to seek professional advice for clarification prior to taking any action.

 

Please click my scales at the bottom of my profile window on the left if you found my advice useful.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks RayKay and Sailor Sam. To Clarify, the car park is fenced off from the road but not gated, however, the Dock Estate is, as a new road layout was introduced last year and all entrances closed except one which now has a security gate and barrier in and out.

I am waiting to see what the DVLA come back with but I was told that ABP, associated british ports gave the DVLA powere to treat the roads as public although I understand this was before the new gated layout.

I have found all this out since the incident so as far as I was concerned, I made a genuine SORN but I still fail to see how a car park on a gated estate can be deemed a public road.

I am going to need some good legally inclined minds soon methinks as I intend to dispute it if they try it on. just worried about the costs.

Of course I will pay you everything you say I owe with no proof.

Oooh Look....Flying Pigs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you permission to park there from APB to park there? Not that it makes much difference as far as the DVLA are concerned.

 

the bottom line is that they cannot do anything providing your car is SORNd and it is not parked on a public road. Have you checked the vehicle status with the DVLA?

 

__________________

Please Note

 

The advice I offer will be based on the information given by the person needing it. All my advice is based on my experiences and knowledge gained in working in the motor and passenger transport industries in various capacities. Although my advice will always be sincere, it should be used as guidence only.

 

I would always urge to seek professional advice for clarification prior to taking any action.

 

Please click my scales at the bottom of my profile window on the left if you found my advice useful.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was told that ABP, associated british ports gave the DVLA powere to treat the roads as public although I understand this was before the new gated layout.

 

ABP cannot give power to DVLA to treat their roads as public roads, either they are public roads within the meaning of VERA 1994 or they are not, gates and barriers have nothing to do with it. The criteria for a public road is that it is a road maintained at public expense, if that is not the case then SORN instead of a licence is valid and DVLA contractors have no authority to remove vehicles that are correctly SORN.

 

I wonder if ABP are just using that as an excuse because they want the vehicles removed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ABP cannot give power to DVLA to treat their roads as public roads, either they are public roads within the meaning of VERA 1994 or they are not, gates and barriers have nothing to do with it. The criteria for a public road is that it is a road maintained at public expense, if that is not the case then SORN instead of a licence is valid and DVLA contractors have no authority to remove vehicles that are correctly SORN.

 

I wonder if ABP are just using that as an excuse because they want the vehicles removed.

 

This is what i'm thinking.

 

__________________

Please Note

 

The advice I offer will be based on the information given by the person needing it. All my advice is based on my experiences and knowledge gained in working in the motor and passenger transport industries in various capacities. Although my advice will always be sincere, it should be used as guidence only.

 

I would always urge to seek professional advice for clarification prior to taking any action.

 

Please click my scales at the bottom of my profile window on the left if you found my advice useful.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sailor Sam, I have received the confirmation letter from the DVLA accepting the SORN but when I checked on thier website, the status is now unlicenced.

 

Ray Kay and Sailor Sam, I am told that ABP did want the vehicles removed after going around and seeing some that had been there a very long time.

Mine had been there for 4 weeks.

Of course I will pay you everything you say I owe with no proof.

Oooh Look....Flying Pigs

Link to post
Share on other sites

It will show as unlicensed, as all registered vehicles now have to be licenced, the offence would be that of being the registered keeper of an unlicensed vehicle - s.31A VERA 1994, however s.31B gives conditions under which the registered keeper does not commit an offence under s.31A, one of which is if there is a current SORN declaration in respect of the vehicle. So although it is unlicensed, you do not commit an offence - don't lose the SORN letter!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sailor Sam, I have received the confirmation letter from the DVLA accepting the SORN but when I checked on thier website, the status is now unlicenced.

 

Ray Kay and Sailor Sam, I am told that ABP did want the vehicles removed after going around and seeing some that had been there a very long time.

Mine had been there for 4 weeks.

 

SORN lasts up to 1 year then it has to be re-newd unless the car is taxed. Providing the SORN hasn't lapsed and is current, then you have nothing to worry about. As Rakay says, keep the letter!

 

__________________

Please Note

 

The advice I offer will be based on the information given by the person needing it. All my advice is based on my experiences and knowledge gained in working in the motor and passenger transport industries in various capacities. Although my advice will always be sincere, it should be used as guidence only.

 

I would always urge to seek professional advice for clarification prior to taking any action.

 

Please click my scales at the bottom of my profile window on the left if you found my advice useful.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...