Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks I just had a quick look.  Will study over the w/e My friend does have kids. But it's a really dysfunctional family.  They don't talk.   Many years ago he sold 2 property assets and gave them a lot of money (enough to buy homes w/o loans) .  They've done nothing for him in the last 2 decades. And he altered his will so his new partner gets everything; the kids nothing (more). The 1st form I glanced at - to be deputy - asks for family details.   If I give his kids details I suspect the authorities may say they should get the deputy job instead?  Then  they will steal the money and give nothing to his partner. I can get a copy of the medical assessment  - and get it translated.  If need be.   This has all happened very quickly.  He got sick. And that must have kick-started dementia.   He was fine to hold a detailed conversation 6months ago; now he cant
    • Hi I think the only way around this as he lacks capacity is someone is going to have to apply to be a deputies via the Courts as he has assets here in the UK and a UK Bank Account which will take time and there will possible be Court Fees to make the application. Also if the Lack of Capacity (Dementia) was diagnosed abroad the person applying for deputies will need that diagnosis and it will need to be translated legally for the UK Courts so possibly cost for this as well. Also for reference although you were assisting them before the lack of capacity and had authority to act on there behalf that no longer stands due to there diagnosis of Dementia therefore Lack of Capacity so you no longer have any authority legally to act on there behalf unless the below is actioned or someone has Power of Attorney for that individual (which was setup before the Lack of Capacity) Have a wee look at these links: https://www.gov.uk/become-deputy https://www.lawsociety.org.uk/topics/private-client/mental-capacity-international-aspects#:~:text=You might need to make,act within the foreign jurisdiction https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/office-of-the-public-guardian I have got to ask with the Dementia diagnoses are you 100% sure the diagnosis states they Lack Capacity as not everyone that gets a Dementia diagnoses may lack capacity initially. Now the Office of the Public Guardian link above you could also consider giving them a call just to give them a brief on this situation and get there advice on what documents etc are needed for deputies to be appointed as the person with Lack of Capacity is abroad.
    • Ultimately, when systems wobble, there is little that can be done - except wait for a fix.View the full article
    • The ready-made drinks are at the heart of a labour dispute that saw thousands of Ontario liquor board workers walk off the job.View the full article
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Suspended - Investigation FB comments - Gross Missconduct


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5104 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have been with my current employers for nearly nine years, for the past few years morale at the Company has been at an all time low. The situation has got to the stage where we as employees have been in discussion and balloted for industrial action (of which I am a keen advocate). There are many issues ongoing which has cause a big divide between Management and us in the front line.

 

Because I have been at the company a long while and because I have some influence with newer members of staff I believe I am being targeted.

 

I returned from a holiday (On the Monday) to be given a verbal advice the day I got back for a very petty incident (I was wearing an incorrect name badge) I informed the supervisor that this although not common practice had been perfectly acceptable in the past, and said that I do not accept this and refused to sign. (whilst away the rules re name badge wearing had been changed to state "It had to be your own name").

 

On the Thursday I was called into a Managers office along with a union rep (which i thought was to discuss the name badge incident) only to be told that I was to have a Q&A with regards Face Book comments I had made since May30th.

 

I know that we are not allowed to be negative or mention our Companies name, and had my settings and friends only for chat, and friends of friends for photos.

 

I therefore assumed only my friends could see any comments and join any discussion. I also at no time mentioned the Company name but ref to them ambiguously as "School" and "Teachers" ect. I was venting my anger and work situations and the way we are treated.

 

I have now been suspended, was told I would be contacted the next day after investigation, and since then told after the week end and then just to standby.

 

I am at a loss at this, I am totally stressed out by the whole episode and feel it is such a cheap shot at getting rid of somebody and replace thenm with a new person who wont argue for their rights ect.

 

I have read articles about the recent thing of people being sacked over FB comments and have spoke to a lawyer online who said they are aloud to investigate employees. He did say that because my comments never mentioned the Company or Managers names it was ambiguos and therefore not serious BUT I am still very worried I may lose my job, I have a mortgage am 43 and would not know where to start if sacked.

 

I feel that my privacy has been invaded (and my friends), I have since learnt that I can block individuals and have culled my friends list, but this doesn't stop me wondering how this was done.

 

The Company say that because its a social networking site the public can view my comments, interpret them, realise who I work for and therefore bring them into disripute which is ridiculous??

 

Any advice would be helpfull

Link to post
Share on other sites

Reference the name-badge incident if they changed the policy whilst you were away, and you did not know of or sign the new policy, then I would argue you are not bound by it.

 

In regards to the FB comments I would be surprised if this reached the threshold for a dismissal. Keep us update on here as to what happens.

 

There was a recent judgment (I think it might have been CoA, I can't remember) in which it was said that information put on a social networking site is classed as being in the public domain, as a result you would not be able to claim any infringment of your privacy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you work in a school? I work in a school and can tell you that it takes one heck of a lot to lead to a sacking :eek:. The procedure is so drawn out and long-winded that it can sometimes take over a year for someone to be "persuaded" to leave! The only exception to this (to my knowledge) is when a potential CRB issue comes to light... and your situation doesn't sound like anything even close to that.

 

I very much doubt that you will lose your job over this. A couple of people in the school where I work were disciplined for F/book comments some time ago but providing you leave them ambiguous, it's hard to prove if it relates to anyone/anything at work or not. As for the privacy aspect, "friends of friends" covers just about anyone.... and.... under "newsfeed" other people's activities often come up if you've commented on them, or if they have commented on yours, so in reality.... nothing is private on F/book at all....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't work in a school no, that was just what we said when chatting instead of naming company or Manager.

 

I really did not think I was doing anything wrong because I believed I was only chatting to friends, whats annoying though is it would be what I would say at work to friend or even in the pub to mates.

 

Apparently somebody else at work now suspended (witch-hunt).

 

Its just so frustrating, yes I had a moan about them, the way they have acted over certain issues but you wouldn't know I was talking about them if you wasn't my friend or in on the silly little code

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I really did not think I was doing anything wrong because I believed I was only chatting to friends, whats annoying though is it would be what I would say at work to friend or even in the pub to mates.

 

Apparently somebody else at work now suspended (witch-hunt).

 

Its just so frustrating, yes I had a moan about them, the way they have acted over certain issues but you wouldn't know I was talking about them if you wasn't my friend or in on the silly little code

 

It might be one of those situations where you get to know who your friends are and... who's more interested in crawling up the ass of the management instead; by dobbing you in, so to speak.

 

F/book is not entirely private.... and anything put on there in writing could put you on dodgy ground. They still have to prove it though.... so until/unless they do, I'd get on with your life as best you can but be very careful who you talk to in future; on or off F/book.

 

:)

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

It might be one of those situations where you get to know who your friends are and... who's more interested in crawling up the ass of the management instead; by dobbing you in, so to speak.

 

F/book is not entirely private.... and anything put on there in writing could put you on dodgy ground. They still have to prove it though.... so until/unless they do, I'd get on with your life as best you can but be very careful who you talk to in future; on or off F/book.

 

:)

 

 

Will do

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no sympathy with anyone who by their own admission supports industrial action, Quote: `of which I am a keen advocate` referring to industrial action.

 

No company in the UK is going to have an employee ,with the above mentioned belief, on their pay roll.

 

Seems to me that you are your own worst enemy.

 

Good luck any way......

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no sympathy with anyone who by their own admission supports industrial action, Quote: `of which I am a keen advocate` referring to industrial action.

 

No company in the UK is going to have an employee ,with the above mentioned belief, on their pay roll.

 

Seems to me that you are your own worst enemy.

 

Good luck any way......

 

You seem to be implying that employers can do what they like.... 8-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no sympathy with anyone who by their own admission supports industrial action, Quote: `of which I am a keen advocate` referring to industrial action.

 

No company in the UK is going to have an employee ,with the above mentioned belief, on their pay roll.

 

Seems to me that you are your own worst enemy.

 

Good luck any way......

 

 

I am not asking for Sympathy just advice, and because I support the current ongoing industrial action does not mean I am a communist Boss hating militant, and as you are not aware with what thats over to generalize just shows the mentality of some people today. If it was not for people fighting for their rights we wouldn't have a minimum wage, or even fair wages for all, wouldn't have better pensions, working conditions and lots more. Until you are on the receiving end of some unjustice you probably wont care eh!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no sympathy with anyone who by their own admission supports industrial action, Quote: `of which I am a keen advocate` referring to industrial action.

 

No company in the UK is going to have an employee ,with the above mentioned belief, on their pay roll.

 

Seems to me that you are your own worst enemy.

 

Good luck any way......

 

Lydeard27 is perfectly entitled to assert his legal rights with regard to industrial action, and to express support for same.

 

I'll remind you that the purpose of this thread is for others to advise OP, and respond to the points he's raised. It is not for you to post an opinion which is highly judgmental, made in ignorance of the facts, and irrelevant to the matter at hand.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You seem to be implying that employers can do what they like.... 8-)

 

Believe you me,employers, they do,`do what they like...`.

 

You only need to read some of the problems raised by workers on this forum on a daily basis,half of which could quite easily be resolved by the use of `simple common sense`, but are they? No!!

 

I speak from personal experiance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not asking for Sympathy just advice, and because I support the current ongoing industrial action does not mean I am a communist Boss hating militant, and as you are not aware with what thats over to generalize just shows the mentality of some people today. If it was not for people fighting for their rights we wouldn't have a minimum wage, or even fair wages for all, wouldn't have better pensions, working conditions and lots more. Until you are on the receiving end of some unjustice you probably wont care eh!

 

So Sorry that you feel ofended by my comments, I was merely suggesting that while all this is going on, you keep a very low profile.

 

And as for `the receiving end of some injustice......`At least you are still in employment and know nothing about the injustice that i continue to suffer.

 

Best of luck

Edited by madari
Link to post
Share on other sites

Believe you me,employers, they do,`do what they like...`.

 

You only need to read some of the problems raised by workers on this forum on a daily basis,half of which could quite easily be resolved by the use of `simple common sense`, but are they? No!!

 

I speak from personal experiance.

 

Yes, I know some employers do what they like. It's an employer's market and has been for years, so some will try it on and hope to get away with playing dirty. That doesn't make it right... which was my point.

 

As for common sense, that only works when the other party possesses it and uses it .... which in my experience, seems to have been replaced (over the years) by "the power trip" mentality instead, e.g. employees trying to climb up the boss's ass by turning on co-workers, while thinking they're indispensable themselves. No-one is.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update: I have been given a Hearing next week.

 

Bringing Company into disrepute

Acts of Incitement

failure to follow procedures

Serious breach of trust and confidence

breaches of confidentiality, predudicial to the interests of the company

 

They definately want me out, I got a meeting with the Union Monday, doent look good though.

 

All this from FB comments that didn't even mention the Company or any Managers name

 

They even implying that my friends who responded to them are members of the public!!! what a joke, and a Manager even said he just put my name into the search engine and was able to read all my posts LIES LIES LIES, there is absolutely no way he could have done that at all I have never had my settings to "Everyone", he got in through a mates account I reckon, but how cant any of that be proved!!!

 

Oh well I best put the flat up for sale and look for a job

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

They dont have to prove anything, all that is required for them to dismiss is to form a `reasonable belief`.

 

The leading authority, is the case of `Burchell v British home stores`,[google it & see]which is now referred to in the courts as, the `Burchell test`.

 

Best not put your flat up for sale,what ever you do `DO NOT ACT IN HASTE`

 

best of luck.....remember it is not the end of the world.you are not the first and certainly wont be the last.Chin up ......

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

They dont have to prove anything, all that is required for them to dismiss is to form a `reasonable belief`.

 

The leading authority, is the case of `Burchell v British home stores`,[google it & see]which is now referred to in the courts as, the `Burchell test`.

 

Best not put your flat up for sale,what ever you do `DO NOT ACT IN HASTE`

 

best of luck.....remember it is not the end of the world.you are not the first and certainly wont be the last.Chin up ......

 

Thanks for the information and kind words

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...