Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
    • thank you you mean you got a notice of discontinuance? dx  
    • Thanks for your interest dx100. Didn’t reach a hearing. Although they filed court papers, they withdrew a few days beforehand, and admitted it was statute barred and I have it in writing that they say the matter is now closed. Once again, many thanks for all your help.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

1and1 Limited - www.1and1.co.uk


Essex-Webs
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5018 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I have accounts with 1and1 Internet (1and1 Limited) www.1and1.co.uk

Been a customer for over 15 months and must of spent over £1000 in that time.

1 of my packages is for a Virtual Private Server at £34.99 + VAT

I downgraded this package to a £14.99 VPS. I have since been sent a invoice for the old package which is incorrect and 1and1 Acknowledge this mistake.

So I have been over charged by £20.00 on the invoice.

1and1 want me to Pay the Incorrect Invoice and will then provide Credit for the £20 at a later date.

The incorrect invoice is dated 27th June 2010 and have sent about 7 emails, 5 phone calls to try and get this sorted out. I am not refusing to pay, just not willing to pay an incorrect invoice.

1and1 have said unless I pay the invoice, my accounts will be suspended.

How can a UK Company act like this, Demand payment for an incorrect invoice and then issue a credit note. Its been over 25 days and they have not issued a credit note.

If they suspend my accounts, all my emails will stop working.

Any Advise please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Been told, unless i pay £48.41 inc VAT by Monday my account will be suspended.

 

I should only have been billed £14.99 + VAT

 

They are based in the UK and dont reply to any of my emails, phone calls.

 

Ive asked to speak to someone senior within the company and they refuse.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Follow my progress at

 

1and1 Internet Limited

 

You might want to move that blog if you start getting any traffic, as 1and1 have every right to shut it down as it's on their servers.

 

Personally, I have my domains with godaddy or namecheap (or 123-reg for uk domains) and then use either hostgator, midphase or hostnine (latter has uk-based servers) for hosting.

 

I have used 1and1 in the past and tbh found them to be pants. And, I would rather use cpanel hosting on reseller accounts now - which works great.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Essex,

 

It's rip-off Britain, there are some contact details here

United Internet AG - Impressum-Hauptsitz

 

You could threaten them with small claims court, breach of contract.

It's actually a German company. Any letters send recorded.

 

Give Consumer Direct a ring Consumer Direct

 

 

Depends where you bought from, but getting consumer direct onto 1&1 limited: WebCHeck - Select and Access Company Information might be better.

Link to post
Share on other sites

UK-blog.co.uk is now with 123-reg not 1and1 - dns should of been updated and pointing to the new server

 

if your dns as updated, you should see a site that looks like

 

here is the blog link >> 1and1 Internet Limited

 

1an1.jpg

 

You don't need to show me a screenshot, I'm not stupid.

 

I'm guessing you must have moved it over this morning? (as all of the dns records haven't updated).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry Zingy, i was not calling you stupid, just wanted to make sure you was getting the correct page thats all.

 

You're okay. I'm not your average joe public who knows sod all about t'internet and the like.

 

Why did you choose a subdomain for the blog anyhow? Thought a nice aged domain would do better with the big G (and a few more posts that are fully pinged (as well as a load of links) should get you some traffic etc).

 

Also, there's loads of people who have moved away from 1and1 etc, see: 1and1 Hosting Reviews - Read 1and1 Hosting Web Hosting Reviews at WebHostingTestimonials.com

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya Zingy

 

reason for using a sub domain for the blog, is so i can use the main domain for like a index to all the sub blogs (sub domains)

 

 

so http://www.uk-blog.co.uk/ would have a Index page full of content etc and then it would have links to all other blogs such as http://1and1.uk-blog.co.uk/

Link to post
Share on other sites

Each to their own I guess.

 

I don't use subdomains any longer as they offer no real benefit; they are treated as new sites by google and if you start to get some serious traffic then you'll get sandboxed for a good six months or so from G (I speak from experience).

 

Good luck with it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why do google sandbox sub domains? if google class them as new sites

 

It's too much to go into on here, but they don't know the validity of your site as it hasn't been around for long and blackhatters use subdomains a lot to [problem] the system.

 

So, in essence, your site isn't trusted by Google - it wants to see what you're going to do etc. Just as if you're given financial advice by a guy in his early 20s who has just passed all his qualifications to be an IFA, compared to someone who has been in the position for 10 years+ and has many satisfied clients. You'd probably be inclined to place more credibility on the latter guy's advice than the first.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...