Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well tbh that’s good news and something she can find out for herself.  She has no intention if peace.  I’m going to ask the thread stays open a little longer.   It seems she had not learned that I am just not the one!!!!  plus I have received new medical info from my vet today.   To remain within agreement, I need to generally ask for advice re:  If new medical information for the pup became apparent now- post agreement signing, that added proof a second genetic disease (tested for in those initial tests in the first case but relayed incorrectly to me then ), does it give me grounds for asking a court to unseal the deed so I can pursue this new info….. if she persists in being a pain ? If generally speaking, a first case was a cardiac issue that can be argued as both genetic and congenital until a genetic test is done and then a second absolute genetic only disease was then discovered, is that deemed a new case or grounds for unsealing? Make sense ?   This disease is only ever genetic!!!!  Rather more damning and indisputable proof of genetic disease breeding with no screening yk prevent.   The vet report showing this was uploaded in the original N1 pack.  Somehow rekeyed as normal when I was called with the results.  A vet visit today shows they were not normal and every symptom he has had reported in all reports uploaded from day one are related to the disease. 
    • Hi Roberto, Read some of the other threads here about S Sixes - they all follow the same routine of threats, threats, then nothing. When you do this, you'll see how many have been in exactly the same situation as you are. Keep us updated as necessary .............
    • Nationwide's takeover of Virgin Money is hitting the headlines as thousands of customers protest that they will not get a vote on whether it should happen.View the full article
    • unrelated to the agreement then, could have come from Lowells filing cabinet (who lowells - they dont do that - oh yes they do!! just look at a few lowell paypal EU court claim threads) no name and address for time of take out either which they MUST contain. just like the rest of the agreement then..utter bogroll that proves nothing toward you ... slippery lowells as usual it's only a case management discussion on 26 April 2024 at 10:00am by WebEx. thats good simply refer to the responses you made on your 4a form response only. pleanty of SPC thread here to read before the 26th i suggest you read at least one a day. dx  
    • I think you have the supremacy of contract as it allows you to park in designated areas. I would argue that there being parking enforcement there clearly means its to be used as parking and as such you can use it under your lease. Only need to worry if they ever follow through with a letter of claim and a claimform though
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

The Registry Trust. Genuinely safe to check?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5023 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have just deleted a complex story with Carter that was that complicated I confused myself. :D It really is a mess and my recollection of things is messed up! I do know the account (CC) was opened in February 2004.

 

To cut a long story short, I have a CCJ off him that will be SB'd for enforcement (save an application) sometime in 2011-2012. I think he played the splitting game and that is one reason I *may* elect to check with the trust to see all the details. I have read on here that no CRA's are involved, but can anyone cateogorically state this is the case? I'm sure I've read some murky posts about the trust. I don't even like the idea of paying with my visa debit!

 

I haven't applied for credit in a long time, and have no intentions of doing in the future, save for a possible mortgage, so feel I want to be in the know with as many details about this as possible. If I get the old DCA re-defaulting rubbish on some minute and not owed debts, then I need to sort that out after this is SB'd. The less nudges the better with potential enforcement potentially days away. Some off this debt is owed, though most of it is not and with the interest... I know they only have an application FWIW, as I remember filling it in, anyway..

 

I'm not interested in setting aside or anything.

 

I don't know why I am posting this really, other than I want to know if I can spend my 8 pieces of gold without nudging the back scratchers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have any clue as to which court the CCJ was issued at, I'd suggest you contact them instead. This week I wasted £16 on checking it - the info they gave me was less than that I got off the court :( Northampton CC were brilliant and emailed me back with the info in less than 48hrs.

 

I wasted £8 by checking my current address as opposed to the address which I was at when the CCJ was issued. :mad:

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know which Court, but I assume the bulk centre as it never got to allocation I don't think. Oh, I really don't know, lol.

 

Still, that's a great idea... if I feel I need the info, i'll start by calling them. :D

 

I do know what address the claim was issued at, but £8 my eye if Northampton will give it to me for gratis. Hmmm, might even try that tomorrow giving them only the address at the time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ooooh, Mr Carter... I love you!! :p

 

I now know what date I'm heading for, and even better, thanks to our 'iccle greedy far-from-following-procedure sweatpea Bryan, the most anyone can ever enforce on me, or otherwise, is 15% of the debt, or around 10% without the fees and interest levied thereupon. That's the remaing debt, as I had cleared a third of it.

 

You really shouldn't split your claim, sir - I know that you have no chance of getting anymore than the amount on the CCJ and you, or anyone else, can't see me back in Court again.

 

That is my only (and last!!) CCJ and isn't life funny at times.... I knew how rank DCA's were, but knew nothing of the trickery of splitting claims. How I have wished I found CAG before burying my head in the sand with this, but, and as it turns out thanks to Carter, he helped me considerably with my Natwest card.

 

I do feel naughty as tax writes offs and what I paid is short, although interest on the fees etc wouldn't have been that far off if I had charged their rate and dealt with the claim properly. Oh well, I'll never be reliant on any credit ever again, lesson learnt.

 

Seriously Bryan, thank you chuck xx :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

What bit is left, offer them sightly more than what they paid for it as a full and final settlement. 10% of 10% is.... ;) Then reclaim the charges, and hopefully get to file a court claim for them + 8% interest, and hit them with a few hundred in costs.

 

There's nothing like kicking the DCA **** in the balls while they're posting huge losses at the moment. :D

These are video links to show how I deal with Debt Collectors.

 

Fly fishing for C.A.R.S

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=zPtzK8FqE6k&feature=related

 

Frederickson International don't accept my card type

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=eiZBULlWW6Q&feature=related

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah yes, the 'Clerical Error' gambit often employed by the above. :rolleyes:

 

He must be the unluckiest solicitor in the world, he keeps updating his procedures, re-training his staff but they will have non of it. It must be awful having enemies working within. ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sleeping dogs, Fuzz. :D

 

It would be in contradiction to my DCA rule to talk to him, and I'd be mad to anyway!

 

LMFAO Cerbs. Clerical errors my ar$e. :D

 

Bryan Carter: Split claim debt specialist... 'We promise to eliminate your debt via our very own dubious practices!'.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...