Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • DN is ok DCA NOA is ok, though not one from Newday saying they've sold it. agreement states esigned on a sunday at 11am?? really??  but no typed names or tick box nor any IP address used. if the date is correct then poss ok, it that your correct address for that time of take out? but if not, then that could simply be a copy of someone elses they've used with you details copy'n'pasted over theirs. the agreement details separate T&C's in at least 8.4. a full set of T&C containing your correct address for the time MUST be included. failure renders the agreement unenforceable... have you the T&C's too? dx
    • Npower and Scottish Power and others have always had regulations that require them to treat customers fairly - the threads here and my experiences demonstrate that those regs are little more than useless.   Even Octopus recently spent month after month saying they needed to increase my monthly payments despite my credit balance slowly going up TWICE I had to reset it online back to prior payment as they unilaterally increased it unilaterally. Raised formal complaint and they than said i was paying too much and reduced the payment, again without my agreement, although that time at least they told me they were doing it.   .. and Octopus has been one of the better ones.    
    • Thank you. You left all your personal details showing on the invoice, but I've removed them. From Googling it seems the free parking is limited to one hour.  You stayed two.  There is no point appealing, you did overstay.  That's apart from the fact the private parking companies are just interested in £££££ and never accept appeals. We have other Iceland cases, Iceland as a company refuse to have these invoices cancelled. So it's up to you. Pay £51 and the matter goes away. Or refuse to pay.  Horizon very rarely do court.  We would support you all the way. 
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Default notice from TBI -currys credit/store card


pavidus
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5020 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

If a debt collector has bought a debt and has been extorting money from you on a monthly basis to repay, can they legitimately issue a default notice when you fail to make payment to them? IE Has an actual credit agreement been made between yourself and the debt collector in arranging to make payments to them? Debt already defaulted with the original creditor in 2004.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I did send CCA. Would you beleive I forgot to write their name on postal order so they have sent them back. Will be sending CCA request again, with a fully filled in postal order! I think they are trying to say that I now have some sort of credit agreement with them as I made arrangement to pay them £10 a month.

Link to post
Share on other sites

when they sent the postal order back, what did their covering letter say, as shouldn't make any difference wether you wrote their name on it, propabley just wasting time as they have got no paperwork.

 

Have you checked your credit file?

Is the any default on there from Currys?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did wonder about the postal order. They said as it is not made payable to anyone that I would have to have it amended or redrawn. They acknowledged receipt of my CCA request but were awaiting the postal orders to be reurned. Haven't looked at my credit report for a couple of years, can't remember any default.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well get the postal order back to them soon as by recorded or they will say they never received it.

If nothing back in 12+2 working days from receipt then just sent account in dipute letter and stop payment.

If you do get anything back post it up on here (minus personal details) and we will see if it worth any weight in court.

 

Do not speak to them on the phone and if you have direct debits set up with them cancel them. Standing orders are ok as you are in control of that and under no curcumstances ever give them your debit card details

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have just checked my credit report through credit expert, experian. TBI defaults showing, the defaults were placed on my report on the 18th of this month. The dates shown as the default dates are 2004 and 2005! Can't find anything else on my credit report at all, not even any outstanding debts!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

May I add that the defaults have been listed as credit/store card. I have never had a store card, I may have had finance arranged to purchase something from them but not a card with an ongoing credit facility. Is it wrong to have the default listed as being credit/store card when that was not the case? Can they issue this default five and six years after it occured?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think what has happened here is the the original creditor placed the default in 2004 as you say,

so that will be due to drop off some time this year as the six year limit is up.

 

Why it is marked again in 2005 I didn't know.

Is it for the same debt? and was it still with the same creditor?

 

When a debt is sold, either the new owner or the OC can update the records, but not both.

 

If you enter into a payment plan with the new owner you have essencially entered in to an agreement,

if you fail to pay under the terms, then the new owner will default you again,

as you have breach the conditions of the new payment plan, not the original.

 

You cannot be defaulted twice on the same debt whilst in remains with the same owner.

 

Once sold the new owner can default for breach of any new payment arrangment.

 

Hence why it is always better to get proof they have a legal right to collect the debt before making any payments to a DCA.

They cannot default you on something you have yet to agree to.

 

Others might have an angle on how to approach this as something is fishy,

 

they are trying to screw your credit file for a further 6 years as your penance for not paying in the first place, something which is not on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...