Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi and thanks It looks like they ticked all the boxes to me but I'll try and upload the notice. I was wondering if a witness to late delivery might be considered proof - I'm assuming they posted it as normal but Royal Mail stuffed up delivery. If not then they're really saying it just has to be posted within 12 days of the incident, regardless of when it is received. Annoying! edit ok thanks Honeybee here's my 2nd (actually 3rd) attempt at anonymising, copying and uploading the notice! Sorry about the state of it - I sat on it while distracted by my dog 🙃 pcn front.pdf pcn back page.pdf
    • ROFL - dont get upset just because someone (quite a lot of someones) dont want smart meters - well unless you get paid for it .. in which case ...   I assume you haven't been with Octopus long enough to be on one of the very long fixed price tariffs they offered before the prices went bonkers .. and that you dont use your electricity in the evening/lunch time if you think the 'agile type tariffs are good value .. let alone worth installing a smart meter for - high price a good disincentive for an evening cuppa eh? Let alone all your computer/tv etc time in the peak price evening or lunch time. - and boy do those peak prices instantly hammer your bill when those Russian and middle eastern issues kick off.   I would only have considered a smart meter if solar panels had been an option for me - but roof is oriented completely the wrong way. Oh - and My opinion hasn't changed since the smart meter trials 40 years ago, because neither have the issues (well not enough) but I'm happy for you. Be happy for me.
    • Hi. I'm afraid I've had to hide your post with the pdf files to keep this anonymous for you. You've left the PCN reference number and your car reg showing. Could you edit that and repost please? HB    
    • Well naturally if you want to maintain your outrage, and retain something to bitch about, then arguing about the level of your fixed monthly DD is the way to go. You are of course perfectly free to ignore the easy solution.
    • His financial situation isn’t great, and the landlord has made lots of things up. The things he’s put isn’t true at all. My friend did tell the full truth with incoming and outgoing, I helped him fill in his form and he checked bills etc. to make sure it was right. His wage is ok, but not as good as the landlord thinks it is,  and he doesn’t have anything spare. How much are they likely to take from him? Should he send any reply?  the letter just says to take the court letter with him. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lloyds - removing benfits from Disabled Living A/C


Csol2001
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5007 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

My wife received a letter today from Lloyds advising her that as she had missed her minimum payment on her credit card they have taken it from my brother in law's Lloyd TSB account. He registered disabled, following a stroke and my wife and father in law administer as signatories on his account, to pay for his disability carers etc.

 

In a despicable attempted to up the Anti on my wife and embarasse her, I quote from the letter as follows:

 

"IF THE ACCOUNT THAT WE HAVE TRANSFERRED FUNDS FROM IS HELD JOINTLY, AND A QUERY IS RECEIVED FROM YOUR JOINT ACCOUNT HOLDER ABOUT THIS PAYMENT, WE WILL BE REQUIRED TO EXPLAIN THAT THE FUNDS HAVE BEEN TRANSFERRED INTO THIS LOAN ACCOUNT. HOWEVER TO MAINTAIN YOUR PRIVACY NO FURTHER DETAILS ABOUT THIS ACCOUNT WILL BE SUPPLIED

 

As she is named on the bank account with my Father in Law, given his level of disability that the local branch is aware that my brother in law in registered disabled, the bank is abusing its T&C's.

 

Q - How should I address this with bank to ensure that it does not happen again.

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are not allowed to do this as confirmed in the attached link.

 

 

 

banking: firms' right of 'set off'

 

Insist they return the payment to her brothers account immediately.

 

 

enamae

Please note: I have no qualifications in this area and any advice offered is given in good faith.

 

 

http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/publications/Ombudsman-news/40/40_setoff.htm

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are trustees of the account. However, have Lloyds been told this and if so is ther evidence that they have been told this.

If you have told them and you have evidence then we can help you cause trouble.

 

Of course, this kind of behaviour is well within Lloyds' very poor level of morality.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks for your replies. No - my and father in law have not informed the bank that they are trustees of the account. I will write to the CEO of Lloyds to inform him of how shallow his bank is, to use such underhand, deceitful and dreadful tactics. He should be ashamed of his bank.

 

Can anyone suggest a use template to use.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't bother about that kind of thing. It is a waste of breath.

 

I suggest that you write them an immediate letter putting them on notice that you are trustees of the account and that the money in it is not yours and that you would like the money which they have taken out put back. If you have some evidence that what you say is true then you should include that with your letter. Let them know the date upon which you became trustees.

 

You might also visit a solicitor and swear an affidavit which you can send to the bank too.

 

I am no fan of Lloyds but I have to say that if you did not tell them of your status in relation to the account then what they have done is not suprising. You really should have made it clear at the outset.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Thanks,

 

We will compose the letter and send off to the bank. The local branch is aware of my Brother in Laws condition. However, this does not translate to Lloyd HQ.

 

For good order and clarity - It was the Lloyd Bank local branch who suggested this approach to managing the account given that there are only 6 payments per month coming into the account, and all Disability Living Allowances.

 

Poorly trained or devious in their training program to grab any and all funds where possible.

 

I will come back with any answers received

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Hi Thanks,

 

We will compose the letter and send off to the bank. The local branch is aware of my Brother in Laws condition. However, this does not translate to Lloyd HQ.

 

For good order and clarity - It was the Lloyd Bank local branch who suggested this approach to managing the account given that there are only 6 payments per month coming into the account, and all Disability Living Allowances.

 

Poorly trained or devious in their training program to grab any and all funds where possible.

 

I will come back with any answers received

I'm not condoning the Banks actions in any way but in absence of any other information wasn't the simplest solution to pay the amount

taken by the bank from the account you co-administer back yourself and at the same time advise the bank that they were never to repeat their action. The fact that only DLA was paid into the joint account would not appear to be pertinent to the transaction.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...