Jump to content


Are Barclaycard default notices invalid?


Drederick Tatum
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5027 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

scan your dn

remove all pers info inc barcodes etc but leave all figures and dates.

goto one one of the many free online pdf converter websites

convert the image to pdf format.

open a new msg box here

hit go advanced below the msg box

hit manage attachments below that box

browse to your pdf file and upload it

hit close this windows at the bottom below upload it box

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've posted it previously in the Invalid Default Notices thread over in the Debt Collection Industry forum on this site but I'll post it up again to five people an idea about what I'm talking about.

 

The dates are fine but people have mentioned in there, as well as Slick in here in a thread I was reading earlier that Barclaycard default notices sent through Mercers are invalid, people believe it's invalid because the creditors address isn't present, backed up by the Consumer Credit (Enforcement, Default and Termination Notices) Regulations 1983 saying that (1) The name and a postal address of the creditor or owner. should be on there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

then slick is your man

 

unless it was posted 1st class then its not valid anyhow

 

its always best to keep to one thread then people dont waste their time.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi DT,

 

Yes, this DN is not valid is it fails to comply with the strict requirements imposed by the CCA 1974.

 

See Sections 87, 88 and 89 here - http://www.passprotect.studio400.me.uk/Consumer_Credit_Act_1974.PDF

 

Read further on this here - The Consumer Forums - Challenge a default on a disputed account and here - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/data-protection-default-issues/

 

Also, if there are any unlawful penalty charges included in the balance stated on the DN, this also renders the DN invalid.

 

You can tell any CRA that has the DN showing against you that you require your dispute to be recognised until the matter is resolved.

 

:)

  • Haha 1

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...