Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I guess we can expect ‘clarification’ from the PM tonight while the sky fills with flying pigs. My best guess on further measures: You can cross parish boundaries as long as you hop on one foot whilst humming happy birthday  Cars can move between different boroughs with differing restrictions as long as the combined ages of the occupants total no more than 90 years If your journey involves crossing county boundaries you need to download a government approved eye test chart and use this as your permit to travel.      
    • From what I can gather, which may be wrong or incomplete   The saliva test is supposed to be cheaper, easier and quicker to implement and check than the swab tests (projected at $10 in USA) BUT only effectively tests for infection in the upper respiratory tract - ie is readily spreadable by coughs and sneezes etc hence only 'validly flags people as 'not currently spreading via coughs and sneezes and only that for a limited time - perhaps a day tops.   Not sure how its supposed to check whether people are 'sweating' it out although it does seem likely that if people are sweating it - they would have it in the upper respiratory tracts - seems a reasonable assumption to me as a 'none virologist' . I'm not sure how certain it is that upper tract infections are the first - although it does seem likely in many or perhaps most cases   Not really how it was originally 'sold' - but nothing new with that It likely it uses relatively portable testing machines to test locally rather than send them off as in the reports of the 'Southampton' tests   https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-saliva-test-for-coronavirus-piloted-in-southampton https://health.usnews.com/wellness/articles/what-to-know-about-new-saliva-tests-for-covid-19 https://heavy.com/news/2020/08/covid-19-saliva-test/ https://kstp.com/coronavirus/mdh-covid-19-briefing-fall-sports-changes-first-saliva-testing-sit-to-open-/5869458/ https://www.latimes.com/science/story/2020-08-31/covid-tests-with-saliva-are-comparable-to-nasal-swab-tests   As for charging everyone for it .. Just another way of taxing the NHS/care industry who along with schools and shop staff (IMO) would benefit the nation/community most by having it - other than that it just largely seems to be enabling the wealthy to bypass restrictions have their days out grousing and stag'ing .. as Dodo told the CBI “For that sort of test that may be a normal cost of doing business to be able to have non-socially distanced activities, but that’s different than for symptomatic people who should always feel like they can come to an NHS service.”  
    • Particulars of claim  1) The claim comprises the following  Agreements the defendant entered into: a. EDF energy customer plc  with reference 671061193309 and current balance of £124.47 b. Capital one (Europe) plc with reference 5460978463392406 and current balance £194.97  The agreements were terminated as payments were not maintained  and subsequently assigned to the claimant  And the claimant claims: a)The total of the said sums being £319.44 b) Interest pursuant to s69 county court act 1984 at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue, but limited to one year, being £25.56 c) costs    Issue date: 07 September 2020   Name of Claimant: Lowell
    • Includes eligibility, appeals, tax credits and Universal Credit View the full article
    • By the way, I'm curious. Would the parcel shop have known what was in the parcel? Was it clear from the wrapping or did you have to tell them what it was before they gave you the receipt?
  • Our picks

    • @curryspcworld @TeamKnowhowUK - Samsung 75 8K TV - completely broken by Currys. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/426151-samsung-75-8k-tv-completely-broken-by-currys/&do=findComment&comment=5069075
      • 4 replies
    • @skinnyfoodco Skinny Foods. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/426130-skinny-foods/&do=findComment&comment=5068996
      • 8 replies
    • I’m in desperate need of help
       
      I bought some clothes online in may through Evans and paid through PayPal
      returned them all seven days later
       
      I waited the 14days for my refund and no refund came
      I put in a dispute through PayPal but I didn’t get any emails to escalate the case - PayPal closed it. 
      evans said they couldn’t refund the money because PayPal have cancelled the refund because of the open dispute
       
      I contacted PayPal
      they said the dispute had been closed but Evans at no point had attempted a refund.
      fast forward to today
       
      I’ve got copies of numerous messages sent to and from twitter messages as it’s the only way I can contact them
      I’ve also contacted their customer service too
      all I get is PayPal have cancelled refund because dispute is still open.
       
      I have proved that the dispute is closed
      I have got an email saying that if Evans sent the refund they would accept it
      but up until the date I got the email they have not once attempted a refund .
       
       I have sent them a letter before court email
      I have even offered to have the full refund as a gift card just to get this sorted !
       
      I’m literally at the end of my tether and don’t know where to turn next !
       
      i suffer with mental health issues and this is affecting my health and I’d saved the money for a year to buy these clothes as I’m on a low income .
    • In desperate need of help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/425244-in-desperate-need-of-help/&do=findComment&comment=5067040
      • 29 replies

Case file I need W F Harrison & Co Ltd v Burke and another !


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 3493 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

I put it in the title for future people searching.

 

SFound a couple of links, but they are both 404's

 

Anyone able to help me attaching the case of;

W F Harrison & Co Ltd v Burke and another - [1956] 2 All ER 169

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites
I put it in the title for future people searching.

 

SFound a couple of links, but they are both 404's

 

Anyone able to help me attaching the case of;

W F Harrison & Co Ltd v Burke and another - [1956] 2 All ER 169

thanks

 

Hello niknakszaks,

 

I take it you are looking for the authority on assignments (legal and equitable).

 

Who is your case with, what creditor?

 

 

Kind Regards

 

The Mould

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have had a read of your thread.

 

Why don't you put in a plea of 'no legal title to sue', regarding the legal assignment issue.

 

The authority on assignment:

 

Roberts (FC) (Appellant) v Gill & Co Solicitors and others (Respondents) -

[2010] UKSC 22.

 

Have a very good read of that, Judgment given on 19 May 2010, Heard on the 22 and 23 February 2010.

 

You will find info on case law there for you to refer to and rely on as far as assignment is concerned.

 

Kind Regards

 

The Mould

Link to post
Share on other sites
will give it a read , thanks.

But my statement is already in, so I need to make sure my bundle is complete for my hearing.

 

 

Yes, argue it on the day of hearing.

 

Kind Regards

 

The Mould

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 7 months later...

Hi niknakszaks

 

Did you manage to find W F HARRISON -V- BURKE AND ANOTHER ???

 

i too am looking for this case and cannot locate it.

 

Any help would be appreciated

 

 

Gemby

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...