Jump to content


Is this A&L default lawful


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5029 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Letter dtd 21st January 2010, (Thursday) possibly 2nd class i.e. 4 days posting time say Tuesday 26th January, allowing you 3 working days to remedy. Clever are they not???? info as per Practice Direction regarding postal times and working days as per J R BICKFORD SMITH Senior Master Queens Bench Division.

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi , thanks for your answers.

 

Hold on to that information for the moment, it could come in very handy in the future.

 

In what way could it be handy?

Link to post
Share on other sites

In that if they now terminate the account it will be an ulawfull rescision ( why is my spell checker not working??) you will only be liabel for the arrears, is that amount they have stated the arrears? Or is that the full amount of the debt? Seems awfully high!

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, wait until they terminate the account, accept their unlwaful rescision, and you are only legally obliged to pay them the arrears.

 

The DN is inherently faulty, keep a copy of it...safe!

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm, missed that point.......damn beer! Cheers Ford....

 

Did'nt realise it was for an OD..

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It wasn't for an overdraft.

It was a flexiplan account with a £3000 limit.

I could transfer upto this amount into my current account and it was paid back by standing order at £100 a month.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In that case then my previous post still stands, wait until the terminate the account, or pass it to a DCA who requests the 'Full' balance then they will have terminated the account, and unlawfully rescinded the account, and you will only be liable for the arrears.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It wasn't for an overdraft.

It was a flexiplan account with a £3000 limit.

I could transfer upto this amount into my current account and it was paid back by standing order at £100 a month.

 

 

oh ok. some form of loan account? so they're demanding the full 'outstanding' amount of the account, as well as your current account? but why does the dn state for eg repaying the 'overdraft' on the flex account?

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok, so are they treating the £3067 as an 'overdraft'? which is the full amount outstanding on the flex ac that they are now demanding? so, there's no 'arrears' as such?

Edited by Ford
typo
Link to post
Share on other sites

While repudiatory breach for an invalid DN is significant in relieving you of the obligation to pay sums not yet due, that is of little value in a debt where the whole balance is due.

However, without issuing a valid DN, they don't have right of action, so keep it under your hat and hit them with it if they issue a claim.....:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...