Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

dx100 V HFC PPI - account 2b **WON +£2k**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4842 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

following on from:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/payment-protection-insurance-ppi/177008-dx100uk-hfc-ppi.html

 

i've three more acounts to hit them with

 

this thread will be about the a/c i will call account B

 

account B

 

taken out in 93 60PCM @ £80 ended NOV 98

i had original agreement, they didn't!

 

 

 

more later

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like another nice little earner to me dx - all the best with it ;)

 

Landy x

LTSB PPI on various loans (current/settled) - Refunded inc 8%

 

MBNA 1 Charges - Refunded inc CI

 

MBNA 1 PPI - Refunded

 

MBNA 2 Charges - Refunded inc 8%

 

MBNA 2 PPI - Refunded

 

MBNA 2 Accident Ins - Refunded

 

Swift Advances (settled) Mortgage Charges -Partially refunded

 

Swift Advances (settled) Mortgage PPI - Refunded inc CI & 8%

 

Sainsburys (settled) Loan PPI - Refunded inc CI +8%

 

Sainsburys (closed) Card Charges - Refunded inc CI + 8%

 

M&S Money (closed) Card Charges - Refunded inc CI

 

M&S Money (closed) Card PPI - Refunded inc 8%

 

Direct Line (settled) Loan PPI - Refunded inc CI + 8%

 

Debenhams Card (closed) PPI - Refunded inc 8%

 

Swift Mortgage Charges -Refunded

 

Hitachi Finance (closed) Charges - Refunded

Link to post
Share on other sites

i started letter tennis with them at the same time as the previous thread jan 09

 

in all 15 letters from me

started fos complaint in nov 09

 

received fos letter july 10 saying they upheld my complaint.

 

now waiting for HFC to cough up

 

i need to investigate if they can off set from this refund [12yrs closed a/c] against arrears on a active A/C

 

anyone know?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

what the fos have said:

 

I am pleased to let you know that following our involvement, HFC Bank has now agreed to make an offer to settle your complaint regarding loan account numbers account b and account A.

 

HFC Bank will be writing to you to explain the precise terms of its proposed settlement - however, it has told us that it will be based on the general approach that the Financial Ombudsman Service takes when we decide that a consumer has been mis-sold a PPI policy.

 

When we find that a policy such as yours was mis-sold we usually ask HFC to put you in the position you would have been in if the policy had not been sold.

 

We would expect this to be done by refunding to you the premiums you paid for the policy as well as interest at a rate of 8% simple per year, from the date you paid the premium to the date the settlement is paid.

 

HFC has agreed to calculate and pay compensation in this manner. You should note that the settlement will also take into account whether a claim has been paid under the policy.

 

If you would like to accept this offer, please sign and return the enclosed settlement form to us by 31st August 2010. We will then pass the form to HFC Bank so it can finalise the details of your settlement with you.

 

Please note that by signing the form, you are accepting the general approach to calculating the settlement on your complaint.

HFC Bank will then write to you with the exact figures (and revised loan details where appropriate) once the calculation has been carried out.

 

If, once you receive the figures, you believe that the firm has made an error in the way it has carried out the calculation, please contact the firm initially to discuss this.

 

If you are unable to resolve the matter with the firm, we will be happy to assist you.

 

 

.............................

 

dx

Edited by dx100uk

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi dx:)

 

I see what you mean about the wording - looks like maybe the FOS are finally getting the message about getting us to sign accepting in 'full and final' when we have no idea what we are agreeing to.................

 

So do you intend to sign?

 

Landy x

Edited by landy_alert

LTSB PPI on various loans (current/settled) - Refunded inc 8%

 

MBNA 1 Charges - Refunded inc CI

 

MBNA 1 PPI - Refunded

 

MBNA 2 Charges - Refunded inc 8%

 

MBNA 2 PPI - Refunded

 

MBNA 2 Accident Ins - Refunded

 

Swift Advances (settled) Mortgage Charges -Partially refunded

 

Swift Advances (settled) Mortgage PPI - Refunded inc CI & 8%

 

Sainsburys (settled) Loan PPI - Refunded inc CI +8%

 

Sainsburys (closed) Card Charges - Refunded inc CI + 8%

 

M&S Money (closed) Card Charges - Refunded inc CI

 

M&S Money (closed) Card PPI - Refunded inc 8%

 

Direct Line (settled) Loan PPI - Refunded inc CI + 8%

 

Debenhams Card (closed) PPI - Refunded inc 8%

 

Swift Mortgage Charges -Refunded

 

Hitachi Finance (closed) Charges - Refunded

Link to post
Share on other sites

part two:

 

You should also get in touch with us by this date if you are unhappy with this proposed settlement and would like us to consider any new points that we should take into account.

 

However, I realise it has taken time to reach this stage and of course, if you think you may be unable to reply by then or require more time, I would be grateful if you could let me know.

 

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

 

there is no mention of it being an F&F , leaving the door open for pending secret commission investigations which i am currently compiling.

 

and yes possibly will sign

 

going over with a find toothed comb this week.

 

some details and minor wording have been changed inc dates to protect the guilty.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

acceptance letter was returnd on the 26th august...still awaiting hfc to cough now they have been told to.

 

have had two pers calls from foc.

 

one on the entries to my credit file whilst account a [my first hfc thread a/c] was in dispute over ppi, because i complained they had marked my file during a period of dispute.

'had i had a response on this from hfc yet...no . he'll get them on that.

 

two.......about my account c [see the thread here..

account c

 

 

dx

Edited by dx100uk

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

22 November 2010

Your complaint about HFC Bank Limited (HFC Bank)

I wrote to you on 4 November 2010 and explained my reasons for upholding your complaint in relation to the loan numbered 2b

As you agreed with my recommendations in relation to the loan numbered 2b

I have sent your signed acceptance form to HFC Bank.

HFC Bank will be in contact with you shortly regarding the payment of redress in relation to loan 2b.

HFC Bank has informed me that the redress will be paid by BACS.

 

moving fwd slowly..........

 

its abt +£2200

 

 

i wonder if i'll get it for xmas

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hfc will pay out normally within two weeks DX, ime starting my new complaint and claim against them, following the FSA;s published charges regime ,it is fact that HFC have not been adhering to the rule they have been charging or should i say using the American method of calculations which in my case amounts to 10.00 per month more than the FSA figures ,so ten years of overcharging methinks dude ...nice tidy sum huh

patrickq1

Link to post
Share on other sites

tnc guys

 

did you check my spreadsheet dj?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

dont uderstand the 8% on bal bit

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

urm..

 

having a dim moment then

 

i have calc'ed it via the fos guidelines and thats simple int for ppi?

 

i use:

http://www.bllaw.co.uk/services_for_businesses/insolvency_and_recovery/simple_interest_calculator.aspx

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

where?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

got a letter today from HFC

 

they are going to refund £2280.61

almost exactly the figure my spreadsheet calcs

 

i'm really confused about this add 8% on the bal.

 

i've never seen it before

 

my figures are £17.54 payments PCM

then 8% stat int from each date it was levied to today

 

cant see how you get an extra 8% again from when the loan finished to dtoday, as i've already got that by claiming to today on each payment

 

am i totally stupid?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

right

spoke direct to the adj today

 

the calc i have done is correct

 

they use no of days since payment to date of oc's letter stating their offer at 8% simple for ppi claims where the A/C is completed.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

won!!

 

money appeared in 3rd party bank a/c xmas eve am!

 

no sign of off-set either which is what i was worried about

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...