Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I don't think I've ever seen someone appeal a mags court decision on fare evasion, JK, but as you say in this case TiredDodo has pleaded guilty. It is possible to challenge, as below. HB Appeal a magistrates’ court decision: Overview - GOV.UK WWW.GOV.UK How to challenge a decision by a magistrates' court. Including how to get a fine reviewed, if you did not know about your case, how to appeal to the...  
    • Update! I have now opened the mail from Barclaycard. I am assuming that their letters were prompted by my confirmation to them of my change of address, which I had advised them of twice. They are treating my change of address notification as a "General Data Protection Regulation Right of Access Request"  and state that I have made a "Right of Access Request. They are asking me to provide valid indentity documents! I have made no such request and am minded to ignore their request for extra information? I should add that their letters were sent to my correct current address!
    • Are you allowed to appeal if you plead guilty?   I know you appeal the sentence, but the criminal record formed from your guilt would surely remain?   I'm not sure if your able to appeal a crimianl record if you plead guilty are you?
    • DX: I did not pursue Link after I got the CCJ amended to monthly payments. Pretty sure the CCJ does not mention reviews, I do have the CCJ somewhere, I will have to look it up in storage. It is as mentioned on the thread you referenced  in your post #28. The Barclays loan was taken out in September 2004 for 60 months! Current Balance remaining approx £2K. On checking back my past correspondence with Barclaycard about this loan, there was a history of them ignoring my letters and offers to pay, and I even had problems in obtaining their bank account details for them to accept my payments! I have received strange correspondence from them too, one referring to insurance which I did not have. They seem very disorganised! Barclaycard told me to pay "Masterloan" a while back and I now receive regular statements and arrears notices from "Personal Loans from Barclaycard" clearly marked Masterloan, they changed the account reference number! I have never requested a CCA on this account. I advised them of my change of address last September, but they are still sending, until today, statements etc. to my old address! I have received 2 letters from Barclaycard Loan today though, not opened them yet!!
    • Yes, a few months ago. They wrote back saying there was no CCA and the debt was unenforcable. I then started gtting bombarded with threatening emails from their 'litigations team' which have been sent to spam. I've now recieved the letter before claim with the PAP form enclosed, but still no CCA or even a letter from them to say the debt is deemed enforcable. Thank you.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

PPC still at it in The Galleries


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5018 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Just nipped over to Asda at The Galleries (which I admit I rarely do nowadays because of the PPC presence that started a couple of years ago) and noticed a couple of cars in the disabled car park with the nice pretty yellow envelopes stuck to their window.

 

Not letting a little thing like that deter me at this time of night I parked my car up and toddled in for my milk fully expecting to come out and find a sticker on my window too.

 

I wasn't too bothered as I now have the address of a great website I could have posted on to help me beat the PPC [problematic] if need be. :D:D I'm sorry to say though, I don't need your help tonight guys coz I got no yellow envelop on my car for my 5 minute "transgression" of their rules. :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

This isn't directed at you crem as I don't know your personal circumstances, it's more of a general rant using the royal "you".

 

Were these bays actually being used by disabled people? I must admit as I much as I hate the [causing problems] PPC's, people who park in disabled bays because "I was only going to be five minutes" and "they weren't being used" really **** me off too. It ceases to be about whether or not blue badges are enforceable in private car parks etc, and just becomes about basic human courtesy and respect.

 

If you're not disabled, leave the disabled spaces for those that are and can benefit from them. Otherwise you're just a bit of a ******.

Link to post
Share on other sites

must admit while disabled spaces in private land is not valid, I have two sons in wheelchairs and often I find people taking up the spaces. This is not about the legality of it, but what is right. However I feel mother and toddler spaces are fair game as people get pregnant as a choice, disabilty is not

Link to post
Share on other sites

For those that are familiar with the galleries layout, they will know that the entire "small" carpark of about 45 bays near the Asda 24hour shop is marked as disabled. These were only marked as such when they co-incidently brought in a PPC about 2 years ago, increasing it from about 15 bays with the remainder being standard parking.

 

At the time of night I am talking about, when only the Asda is open, 45 bays is more than enough to cope with the entire customer base of the Asda with most sensible people not actually parking in the bays immediately nearest to the shop entrance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

However I feel mother and toddler spaces are fair game as people get pregnant as a choice, disabilty is not

 

And that isnt really an argument to use them, if you do its as bad as using a disabled space, they are there for a reason at the end of the day.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And that isnt really an argument to use them, if you do its as bad as using a disabled space, they are there for a reason at the end of the day.

 

 

The reason these spaces are there is as a marketing strategy.

 

That said, I think they are a good ides - it lessens the chance of one of them parking next to my car and some vile brat opening their car door onto mine and damaging it.

 

I think Crem has a point, though. Quite why people feel the need to inflict their screaming, badly-behaved spawn upon others in a supermarket is beyond me. Don't these people have cellars? ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

And that isnt really an argument to use them, if you do its as bad as using a disabled space, they are there for a reason at the end of the day.

 

Meh, I disagree. Just because little Johnny throws a tantrum when he has to walk an extra twenty feet to the store doesn't mean you deserve to park any closer than me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just because little Johnny throws a tantrum when he has to walk an extra twenty feet to the store doesn't mean you deserve to park any closer than me.

 

Who says anything about 20ft? Who said little Johnny can actually walk yet? One shopping centre near me if you park on the upper level then you cant physically get a pram down unless you push it down the ramp dodging cars - dangerous! Hence why there are parent spaces on the ground floor.

 

Whilst I do not agree with PPCs and their fines/invoices mentality, if you park there dont go moaning when someone nicks your disabled space!

 

Although it did give me immmense satisfaction asking the Porsche driver to shift his car out of one as he rolled up the other week, not just little Johnny who is a lazy @rse :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not disabled and I don't have children, so it's not something that affects me personally. But as someone said above, one is a choice and the other is not. I will park further away if you physically cannot, but that is rarely the case just because you have a child in tow (anecdotal isolated incidents aside).

Link to post
Share on other sites

The fact one being a choice and one not is a red herring, we are discussing the provision of the spaces. Else shopping, going to the cinema, everything else, etc is a choice.....

 

Legally you can park where you want, disabled or parent +child, at a PPC car park, its just graffiti as has been stated on other threads. Council you cant.

 

If it doesnt affect you then its just a case of you stating 'Im alright Jack'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess it all depends on where you draw your own line in the proverial moral sand. I don't view people with children as deserving any special dispensation, it appears you (and indeed others) do. I think there is certainly a lot more mutual understanding that can arise out of this particular scenario than that of lazy arseholes parking in disabled spaces, so I'll leave it at that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...