Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. Could you post up what they've sent please so we can see what the charge is? Cover up your name and address and their reference number. HB
    • I've looked through all our old NPE threads, and as far as we know they have never had the bottle to do court. There are no guarantees of course, but when it comes to put or shut up they definitely tend towards shut up. How about something like -   Dear Jonathan and Julie, Re: PCN no.XXXXX cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea that you actually expected me to take this tripe seriously and cough up. I'll write to you not some uninterested third party, thanks all the same, because you have are the ones trying to threaten me about this non-existent "debt". Go and look up Jopson v Homeguard Services Ltd, saddos.  Oh, while you're at it, go and look up your Subject Access Request obligations - we all know how you ballsed that up way back in January to March. Dear, dear, dear - you couldn't resist adding your £70 Unicorn Food Tax, you greedy gets.  Judges don't like these made-up charges, do they? You can either drop this foolishness now or get a hell of a hammering in court.  Both are fine with me.  Summer is coming up and I would love a holiday at your expense after claiming an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g). I look forward to your deafening silence.   That should show them you're not afraid of them and draw their attention to their having legal problems of their own with the SAR.  If they have any sense they'll crawl back under their stone and leave you in peace.  Over the next couple of days invest in a 2nd class stamp (all they are worth) and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
    • Okay please go through the disclosure very carefully. I suggest that you use the technique broadly in line with the advice we give on preparing your court bundle. You want to know what is there – but also very importantly you want to know what is not there. For instance, the email that they said they sent you before responding to the SAR – did you see that? Is there any trace of of the phone call that you made to the woman who didn't know anything about SAR's? On what basis was the £50 sent to you? Was it unilateral or did they offer it and you accepted it on some condition? When did they send you this £50 cheque? Have you banked it? Also, I think that we need to start understanding what you have lost here. Have you lost any money – and if so how much? Send the SAR to your bank as advised above
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Buchanon Clark and Wells. Charges!**Resolved** well almost.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5025 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Buchanon Clark and Wells have contacted me regarding an outstanding gas bill from a previous address. They have very helpfully decided that it would be reasonable to charge me an extra 35% of the orirginal bill in costs. Is there anything I can do about that? The dates that they have quoted for my total gas usage include an entire month after I moved out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I'll move this thread to a more appropriate Forum.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Buchanon Clark and Wells have contacted me regarding an outstanding gas bill from a previous address. They have very helpfully decided that it would be reasonable to charge me an extra 35% of the orirginal bill in costs. Is there anything I can do about that? The dates that they have quoted for my total gas usage include an entire month after I moved out.

 

When you moved out, you should have given the gas supplier your final meter reading and address to contact you regarding your final statement. As it appears you may not have done this, you need to contact the gas supplier concerned and try to resolve this. Hopefully the new owner or someone has informed them of the meter reading at the time of the change of home occupier, so they can work out a revised bill. Then you need to come to arrangement to pay the relevant amount. I doubt BCW own the debt, they are just chasing on behalf of the gas supplier.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

How do I go about tackling them on this? Is there a specific letter to send or do you have any advice as to what to send to them? They say it is 35% to cover their clients costs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

more like there own costs

 

to begin with you need to find out if yoiur landlord informed the utilities companies after you moved out or did you

 

send bcw a recorded letter asking if they own the debt and to send you a notice of assignment

 

i would contact the utility company also by phone and ask them what amount they are claming and then update your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have contacted Scottish Power today, they say that they still own the debt and that BCW are acting on their behalf. I mentioned the over inflated admin charges and was told to give them a ring about it!. This was supposed to be their social responsibility department, I received no help at all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have contacted Scottish Power today, they say that they still own the debt and that BCW are acting on their behalf. I mentioned the over inflated admin charges and was told to give them a ring about it!. This was supposed to be their social responsibility department, I received no help at all.

 

I don't know where this bit about DCA's not being able to add charges is coming from. From what I have read, they can add charges, but these must not be excessive. Consumer Direct should be able to advise you on this.

 

To resolve this, you must get hold of an accurate bill from Scottish power based on the gas usage you are responsible for. Concentrate on getting that sorted first of all and then you can argue about any charges.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am sending further information and new tenancy agreement to Scottish Power to get the bill amended, they are currently charging for five weeks after I had left. Scottish Power are aware that I am disputing the amount which they are claiming, is there a letter that I can send to the DCA to inform them that the amount is in dispute and to not chase until the bill is corrected?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am sending further information and new tenancy agreement to Scottish Power to get the bill amended, they are currently charging for five weeks after I had left. Scottish Power are aware that I am disputing the amount which they are claiming, is there a letter that I can send to the DCA to inform them that the amount is in dispute and to not chase until the bill is corrected?

 

Just send the DCA a simple letter. e.g Please note this account is currently in dispute with Scottish Power. The amount they allege I owe is incorrect as it includes gas usage when I was no longer legally responsible for any usage in the property, being that I had ended the tenancy. May I request that you put this matter on hold, until you have received revised instructions from Scottish Power. Please note that it is against OFT guidelines to continue collection activity whilst the account is in dispute.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know where this bit about DCAlink3.gif's not being able to add charges is coming from. From what I have read, they can add charges, but these must not be excessive. Consumer Direct should be able to advise you on this.

 

 

they dca can omly add charges if the original agreement allows it in the t&c

 

your account is with the utility company, not the dca

 

i would deal direct with the utility company and tell gthe dca to sod off as they have no legal powers at all

Link to post
Share on other sites

I rang the utility help line and they put me through to Scottish Powers social responsibility department. The lady who I spoke to said that because there was a marker on my account she could not help and I would have to deal with the debt collectors. I explained to her that I was in fuel poverty already with my existing fuel payments and do not have the money to pay the old bills and certainly could not afford 35% charges and she said that if I speak to BCW they may reduce the charges "a wee bit"!. She was not prepared to help me any further and told me to go to CAB.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Report her as she is not properly trained - and another hint when dealing with fuel companies is to ring in the week rather than evenings and weekends, you will get a better trained person more able to help.

 

CAB should be able to help as you already are in fuel poverty.

 

Write a letter to the customer complaints department at the fuel supplier, copying in Trading Standards and the Office of Fair Trading, that might get some action going.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have now resolved this matter with Colin at Scottish Power. The debt is no longer with dca, therefore no more 35% admin. There has been an adjustment made for the period charged that I was no longer resident. Sadly Scottish Power had defaulted me, but apparently Colin will try his best to get this removed. Paying remainder over 18 months. Thanks for help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's good to hear, pavidus.

Hopefully they will remove the default, they should.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...