Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. Could you post up what they've sent please so we can see what the charge is? Cover up your name and address and their reference number. HB
    • I've looked through all our old NPE threads, and as far as we know they have never had the bottle to do court. There are no guarantees of course, but when it comes to put or shut up they definitely tend towards shut up. How about something like -   Dear Jonathan and Julie, Re: PCN no.XXXXX cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea that you actually expected me to take this tripe seriously and cough up. I'll write to you not some uninterested third party, thanks all the same, because you have are the ones trying to threaten me about this non-existent "debt". Go and look up Jopson v Homeguard Services Ltd, saddos.  Oh, while you're at it, go and look up your Subject Access Request obligations - we all know how you ballsed that up way back in January to March. Dear, dear, dear - you couldn't resist adding your £70 Unicorn Food Tax, you greedy gets.  Judges don't like these made-up charges, do they? You can either drop this foolishness now or get a hell of a hammering in court.  Both are fine with me.  Summer is coming up and I would love a holiday at your expense after claiming an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g). I look forward to your deafening silence.   That should show them you're not afraid of them and draw their attention to their having legal problems of their own with the SAR.  If they have any sense they'll crawl back under their stone and leave you in peace.  Over the next couple of days invest in a 2nd class stamp (all they are worth) and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
    • Okay please go through the disclosure very carefully. I suggest that you use the technique broadly in line with the advice we give on preparing your court bundle. You want to know what is there – but also very importantly you want to know what is not there. For instance, the email that they said they sent you before responding to the SAR – did you see that? Is there any trace of of the phone call that you made to the woman who didn't know anything about SAR's? On what basis was the £50 sent to you? Was it unilateral or did they offer it and you accepted it on some condition? When did they send you this £50 cheque? Have you banked it? Also, I think that we need to start understanding what you have lost here. Have you lost any money – and if so how much? Send the SAR to your bank as advised above
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot/morgan Claimform Morgan stanley card debt **struck out**


Hadituptohere
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2936 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thanks Andrew i had held of sending rorys letter until they had comited a criminal offence, which was the 21/02/08 hence the a slighly amended letter to fit has now been sent.

Would also like to point out that I recieved the photocopied rubbish yesturday 25/02/08 but the letter was dated 14/02/08 which would have been before the criminal offence had occured, luckily ive kept the envolope it was sent in that was clearly dated the 22/02/08.

they must really think im stupid??

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 523
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

they must really think im stupid??

 

 

It seems that is precisely what CABOT are relying on !!!

 

With every template they muster up, every court claim they get their bogey like solicitors to issue in courts, every template reply they send us all in answer to our quesries etc.. - they are relying on your complete lack of knowledge in these issues.

 

These companies have spent years "winging it" and making a fortune out of the consumers lack of knowledge.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi

finding it difficult to sit on my hands and wait for cabots next move, is it worth sending a CCA request or S.A.R to Monument?

Hadituptohere

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Just had some good news re the smaller debt that cabot was collecting on unlawfuly : We right further to your request for information under the Consumer Credit Act. Regrettably we have been advised by the original lender that they have not been able to obtain the relevant information for your account.

As a result cabot shall no longer collect on this account. (all that money ive paid them, it makes me really want to vom)

:D :D

Leaving one more to fight....

Hadituptohere.

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just had some good news re the smaller debt that cabot was collecting on unlawfuly : We right further to your request for information under the Consumer Credit Act. Regrettably we have been advised by the original lender that they have not been able to obtain the relevant information for your account.

As a result cabot shall no longer collect on this account. (all that money ive paid them, it makes me really want to vom)

:D :D

Leaving one more to fight....

Hadituptohere.

 

Then ask them to repay you what you have paid them as they have collected money from you without having a right to do so. I could write to you asking for money, but you're not going to pay me are you? - so why give them money - get it back. Ask, they'll refuse, you issue N1 then send in the bailiffs! :D Give them what they'd give you. :D

 

Sarah

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would I be within my rights to do that? ive been paying them 50.00/pm for a few years. its quiet a lot of money

Hadituptohere

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would I be within my rights to do that? ive been paying them 50.00/pm for a few years. its quiet a lot of money

Hadituptohere

 

If you'd been paying me under false pretences for years you'd want it back wouldn't you? If they do not have a right to collect money they have to pay it back.

 

The thing is Cabot 'buy' this debt - a creditor, whether the original creditor or not must supply proof that they are entitled to ask you for money. Well they haven't done that so you have every right to ask for it back - to hell with them. They only paid circa 7 or 8% of the debt value so they won't be losing much anyway so don't begin for one second to start to feeling sorry for them.

 

Write stating that as they have not been able to provide proof under their obligations within the Consumer Credit Act that they are entitled to collect money from you will be expecting a cheque for the total amounts you have paid plus interest @ 8% and if they do not within seven days then you will be taking legal actions to recover same. Then sit back and enjoy the ride.

 

The alleged debt belongs to Cabot, if they have bought something that was not a proven debt then that's tough. It'll teach them to make sure these debts are proven before buying them. You are not under contract to Cabot and entered no credit arrangements with them so they have no rights to demand monies from you. Get it back. & Tell them the Cabot Fan Club send them their love :D

 

Sarah

Link to post
Share on other sites

In no way would I be feeling sorry for these halfwits, just thought id read somewhere in the forum that you wouldnt be able to claim back monies payed to them.

Hadituptohere

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In no way would I be feeling sorry for these halfwits, just thought id read somewhere in the forum that you wouldn't be able to claim back monies payed to them.

Hadituptohere

 

....you probably did, but unless you stick your neck out and challenge them you won't be sent a cheque in a thank you card will you - go for it and make them realise they can't keep buying debt without the proper authority to collect. You won't be alone, there's hundreds of us here helping you to do it. An what have you got to lose? a 32p stamp?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cool, if anyones got some well worded templates/ideas of what to send as im U.S at letter writing. thanks Sarah

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Still putting together a letter to cabot requesting they return the payments the've unlawfuly collected on the smaller of my two so called accounts with them. Its now 31 days since cabot recieved my letter from post 17 in this thread that Rory posted for me and just had a Experian credit check and there still processing data on there, what would the next step be, where should I be complaining to (other than cabot) about this matter? thanks

Hadituptohere

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just thought of another thing I cannot remember recieving a default notice on the alledged debt that cabot have entered a default on..... deoesnt this affect things slightly???????

Hadituptohere

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bump

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its now 31 days since cabot recieved my letter from post 17 in this thread that Rory posted for me and just had a Experian credit check and there still processing data on there, what would the next step be, where should I be complaining to (other than cabot) about this matter? thanks

Hadituptohere

Any help would be appreciated guys

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a look at my blog, and do a search for DPA. You should get an idea from there of why Cabot shouldn't be sharing or processing your data. But be aware, you'll probably have to take them to court to get them to remove the default. There's a lot of hoops to jump through first, such as complaining to the ICO first though. I complained months ago, and although I got an acknowledgement, I've yet to have any further contact from them. Unfortunately, I cannot take court action until I've exhausted all other avenues, including the ICO route.

 

AT this rate, my default will have dropped off before I can make them do it. However, even if that DOES happen, I intend claiming compo for the 6 yers of prejudice I've suffered anyway.

 

As for getting Cabot to return your money, I think you have about as much chance of getting that back as I do of marrying Keira Knightly. But! Nothing ventured, nothing gained, so you could just try something along the lines of...

 

"As you acknowledge in your letter dated (Whenever) that no agreement for account XXXXXXXXXXXX exists, I trust that you will now be making arrangements to repay the amount that was erroneously paid by me in respect of this account, a total of £whatever-it-was.

 

Please indicate your acceptance of this arrangement by issuing a cheque to me for the above amount within 14 days. Failure to do so will mean that I shall have to formalise this with a complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service. You will note of course, that as you have exceeded your own timescale for dealing with my original complaint by a considerable margin, this would be a reasonable course of action under the circumstances."

 

Something like that anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Thanks for the advise Sea, had a reply today following my letter (post 17) sent to cabot which they recieved on the 1/03/08, seems to me like a bog off, sidestepping the points that were made in my correspondance to them. any advise would be appreciated.

 

Markletter2.jpg

Markletter.jpg

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, it might satisfy their obligations in that they only have to supply a copy of the agreement IF it exists. And as it quite clearly doesn't, and the scrap of paper they HAVE supplied is exactly that, then there is no evidence that you ever consented to any sharing of your data.

 

As they seem to have missed their own complaint timescale, I'd say you have done as much as can be resonably expected, and so you can complain to the relevant bodies. Quite clearly, they are in breach of OFT guidlines with respect to debt collection, so have a word with Consumer Direct, who will in turn pass your complaint on to Trading Standards. See their website for a phone number... Consumer Direct

 

The FOS will also be an option. They'll hit Cabot with a £400 if they investigate. Have you sent Cabot a notice under section 10 of the DPA? If you want the default removed, then that should be your next step. If they fail to respond satisfactorily to that, you can escalate your complaint to the ICO. You MUST beVERY clear in your mind as to why you think this is something that Cabot should be doing. As I mentioned earlier though, the ICO is awash with complaints so don't expect a rapid response. But it IS a route a court will have expected you to take before you contemplate taking Cabot to court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again Sea, no havent sent the s10 notice will be on its way tomorrow along with a call to Consumer Direct.

Hadituptohere

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well you wont believe it (or maybe you will!!!) cabot have sent me a letter recieved today, regarding the smaller of the two accounts which they have already written to me to say that they will no longer be collecting on due to the lack of the relevant information, asking me to contact them 'preferably by telephone if this isnt possible then please complete the enclosed budget form along with a proposal for repaying your account, If we dont hear from you within 28 days we'll have no alternative but to resume our telephone procedure.' would you advise that I wait to see if they do contact me via phone and log the calls to ad to my complait to the relevant authorities, or contact them in writing pointing out the previous letter I have recieved as they are sent by two different people

Hadituptohere

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Use the letter as evidence that they are threatening to break the law regarding telephone calls. It's in black and white, so they CANNOT refute it. And get them reported. DON'T tell them, just do it. You have made every effort to be reasonable, and they are so arrogant they think they are above the law. They've been warned, so you can just take the next step now.

 

If the calls do resume, then just add them to your complaint as further evidence.

 

Feckers!!!! :mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Scary isn't it that even at this stage they insist on using template letters in the hope of froghtening us into paying them for an unenforcable debt !!!

 

Regards

Bigandy

The Grand essentials of happiness are: something to do, something to love, and something to hope for.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have recieved a letter today from cabot regarding the smaller of the two accounts (wich they had said they couldnt collect on) informing me that they now have the information necessary and have included :

A copy of the (claimed) credit agreement from morgan stanley.

Copies of the terms and conditions.

A notice of assignment on goldfish letterheaded paper dated 25/4/08 informing me that as of 27/5/04 goldfish has sold and assigned my agreement to cabot (this has Representation of this letter sent on 02/06/04 scribbled in pencil acroos the top).

A template for their letter of introduction dated 25/04/08 (with none of my details in also with Representation of letter sent on 02/06/04 scribbled across the top in pencil).

 

Will post the info asap once I can get access to a scanner to check the legality of the credit agreement/application but any advice would be appreciated.

Hadituptohere

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

RIGHT ive had another letter today reminding me that I havent paid my so called account or been in touch despite the bundle I recieved only had a postal date of the 25/04/08 and didnt recieve till 27/04/08, cant get to a scanner but hope this works :

DSC02113-1.jpg

 

DSC02114.jpg

 

DSC02115.jpg

 

DSC02116.jpg

 

DSC02117.jpg

 

Any suggestions as what to do about this would be appreciated, dont know if the application qualifies as a credit agreement.

Hadituptohere

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bump, again if anyone can please look at this agreement/application and let me know if its a true excecuted cca

thanks

Hadituptohere

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Where do the financial and related conditions come from? If they are not part of the same document as the application then it is not a conforming credit agreement as the prescribed terms need to be in the credit agreement - not in a seperate document.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...