Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi LFI, With regard to the ANPR cameras in your post #65, while I was on the phone to the Planning Department, they did take a look at Google Streetview and went back to 2012 where they could see the ANPR cameras in place so therefore they would have deemed consent. I had previously read the T&C Planning Regulations and had read the section on deemed consent so I understood the point they made on the phone. It doesn't matter though, that doesn't harm my case any, and I shouldn't really mention this now, (this is what you reminded me of on another thread) but in the past I was a member of a scheme that gave me access to legal advice, I have spoken to a barrister previously through this scheme on another matter and I think I am still a member. I am going to check if I am still a member of the scheme, and if I am I will discuss my case with a barrister or solicitor, whichever the scheme deems appropriate. I will let you know the outcome. I am also going to take Bankfodders advice in the sticky and go to the local court and ask if I can sit in on a case in the Judges office.
    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx Yes sorry. they called it a deed at first in court.  Then Judge said she was happy to have it sealed as something else  exact names of orders in message above.     The disease was tested for when his cardiac testing was done immediately after purchase and part of the now sealed case.   However, results were disclosed incorrectly and I only found out  two days ago.   This disease did not form part of my knowledge during the case as I had been informed of a normal result that was not the case.   it is perfect clarity of a genetic disease where as the previous cardiac issue could be congenital until the pup is genetically tested. 
    • Hi, Halifax recently sold a credit card account of mine to Cabot. I am unemployed and have no assets and was thinking of making token £1 payments for 12-18 months in order to drag things out a bit and reduce the chance of Cabot being able to get the correct CCA documents from Halifax if I requested them in future. However, I saw on the pages on this forum about defending county court claims that one of the standard approaches when defending such claims is to say “I had an account with bank X, but I don’t remember the details and so don’t know if I owe this debt…”. If I made £1 payments to Cabot, would it prevent me from using such a defence in future? OC: Halifax DC: Cabot/Wescot Card account opened: 2016 Defaulted: 2023
    • Paperwork says sealed consent order and composite settlement agreement      YES  ADDISONS DISEASE 
    • Hi, This may be the wrong place for a thread BUT If you receive a defence, can you send a CPR 31.14 request for document mentioned in the defence, and then apply to proceed with the case only after (14) days passed or they respond OR is it only if you receive a claim I see @dx100uk thread is for when you receive a claim, but can you also do the same when you receive a defence?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

EGG PPI Offer - Should I accept?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5013 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

After a single letter just received an offer from Egg for miss sold PPI, BUT it ignores the original loan (2001) and contains no compound interest, it is only the original premium plus interest at a "contractual rate" it completely ignores the interest on the loan. Should I reject the offer? It is about a grand short of the figure quoted as total payable in the attached.

 

egg_p1blk.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

So you've asked for £3500 and they've offered £2500?

When you've had all the help you need, make sure you stick around to help others too!

Just think, if everyone left the site after they'd got their help, there might not be anyone left the next time YOU come back needing more assistance!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Scrambled,

 

If in your original claim letter you requested a refund on the original loan from 2001, then personally I would refuse their offer on that basis alone.

 

Am confused by your comment "and contains no compound interest" and then "it is only the original premium plus interest at a contractual rate"

 

If you let us know the date your first repayment was made, I can work out how much your refund should be, then the decision is yours whether or not to accept their offer.

 

DJ

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Scrambled,

 

If in your original claim letter you requested a refund on the original loan from 2001, then personally I would refuse their offer on that basis alone.

 

Am confused by your comment "and contains no compound interest" and then "it is only the original premium plus interest at a contractual rate"

 

If you let us know the date your first repayment was made, I can work out how much your refund should be, then the decision is yours whether or not to accept their offer.

 

DJ

 

Glad I wasn't the only one confused :D

 

 

We need to know the figures to balance up your options :) I was offered £400 less than I'd asked for (although I'd added more than 8% statutory interest on top of the original figure, so I was quite happy to accept their offer). Letting them "off" that £400 is the difference between having a long drawn out battle on my hands, referring to the ombudsmen and making the case longer, or that 4k being in my bank account within 21 days (fingers crossed).

 

It can be fine demanding more and more, but sometimes you have to look at what's the best outcome for you at the time :)

When you've had all the help you need, make sure you stick around to help others too!

Just think, if everyone left the site after they'd got their help, there might not be anyone left the next time YOU come back needing more assistance!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi the original figures are iin the previous attachment for the Oct 2005 loan (I'll have to dig out the 2001 but guessing kinda similar. The offer is 2862 less PPI refund when load defaulted (2009) of 164 plus 113 contractual interest, giving a total of 2811, which is less than the original amount even without the 8%. INteresting they neither accept or deny the loan was miss-sold (existing medical condition), and they only quote the newer loan reference so I guess I could treat them separately.

 

Just a thought on insurance in general, isn't it interesting how the selling of insurance occurs, imagine buying a car in the same way and having to tell the dealer every road you were ever going to drive on with the car before buying, then breaking down on a different road and being told sorry warranty doesn't cover you! The whole finance industry is morally bankrupt and allowed to get away with whatever they like, when was the last time a DCA had its licence removed for mis practice yet if you read these forums it occurs on a daily basis. These forums and the valuable contributors on here offer some of the only real protection out there for consumers. Bit off topic, but just wanted to express my gratitude for here and annoyance for a an industry which takes but never gives.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Getting more confused here scrambled.

 

So to clarify, you have had 2 loans from egg. The first was taken out in 2001 and you made 46 payments before Egg defaulted you in 2009 and have now offered you a refund of £2,282.

 

Right so far?

 

The second loan taken out in October 2005 on which you made 5 payments and then ???????? Egg have made no mention of a refund on the second loan.

 

Correct?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Getting more confused here scrambled.

 

So to clarify, you have had 2 loans from egg. The first was taken out in 2001 and you made 46 payments before Egg defaulted you in 2009 and have now offered you a refund of £2,282.

 

Right so far?

 

The second loan taken out in October 2005 on which you made 5 payments and then ???????? Egg have made no mention of a refund on the second loan.

 

Correct?

 

 

I have a horrible feeling OP thinks he's going to get a huge windfall for the second loan - rather than just a refund of premiums paid.

When you've had all the help you need, make sure you stick around to help others too!

Just think, if everyone left the site after they'd got their help, there might not be anyone left the next time YOU come back needing more assistance!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you tried ringing the person at Egg dealing with your case and asking whether they have investigated your first loan? Secondly I would ask why the contractual interest is so low on the refund. Egg generally won't pay you the 8% statutory interest (I assume this is what you are referring to as compound interest) unless you go through the FOS.

 

The staff are generally quite helpful.

 

Good luck!!

 

PS Forgot to ask, was the balance from your previousloan consolidated into your new loan in 2005?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The first loan was consolidated by the second one, which after five months was defaulted by Egg (even though I paid before the DN deadline, I later found out it was passed to DCA 1 week before their own deadline!). Having looked at the defaulted amount, I think that that the offer by Egg, although low is not too far off, as has been pointed out its a balance between cash now vs 8%.

 

The letter only references the second loan, which may be my error in that I used the claim form by the FSA and only made reference in the notes to the first loan, in hindsight I am guessing that I should have been more explicit.

 

My question I suppose is this, given the reference on the offer relates to the second loan, if I accept that would it affect a future, separate claim against the first one? The first one I guess would be more appropriate to contest the 8% given the time. My feeling at the moment is to accept, wait for the payment and then proceed with the first one later.

 

On a side note, I have been trying to set up a payment plan with Arden, I have made an offer in line with another similar debt, but they refuse to accept without an income/expense report, am I correct that only a court is legally required to request such information? Should I just make the payments I offered and ignore their refusal?

 

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi scrambled,

 

If you are happy to accept this offer, personally I would write to Egg making it perfectly clear this acceptance is in relation to the loan taken out in 2005.

 

Then there is absolutely nothing stopping you going after them for the PPI on the first loan.

 

DJ

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sent off the acceptance yesterday, on the form I added "For account xxxx only" just in case they try and say that their reference number relates to me and not that one account. I should know how they take it in 14 days!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Quick Update

 

I sent the form off with "only in relation to load xxx" written on it and have been patiently waiting for my account to be credited. The past few days I have had to reminders from Egg asking me to return the acceptance form (little keen perhaps) so I called up to ask if they had received it since it has been nearly two weeks. They said they had, noting it was for one loan only and that they had also sent out an offer for the first loan! That is very efficient since I hadn't even mentioned it to them yet! I am waiting for their letter so don't know what the offer is yet. My original intention was to try and insist on the 8% since the loan was 2001 I am guessing that would be a sum worth pursuing. It will depend on what they offer since my car dies yesterday and unless its a reasonable amount and I stand a good chance of winning its probably better jam today. Anyway I'll keep the post up to date when I receive something.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The second offer cam today with "contractual" interest, which is about 45% of what I believe 8% would be (the loan was 2001). I had intended to stick this one out and try for the full, but the car I just bought turned out to be a dog, so better to take the money and get a decent motor since getting to work depends upon it. I am torn between saying well done Egg (for being so quick and easy) or suspicious for them being so. I'll post on the PPI successes when the cash actually arrives, seeing is always believing with the finance industry!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...