Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. Could you post up what they've sent please so we can see what the charge is? Cover up your name and address and their reference number. HB
    • I've looked through all our old NPE threads, and as far as we know they have never had the bottle to do court. There are no guarantees of course, but when it comes to put or shut up they definitely tend towards shut up. How about something like -   Dear Jonathan and Julie, Re: PCN no.XXXXX cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea that you actually expected me to take this tripe seriously and cough up. I'll write to you not some uninterested third party, thanks all the same, because you have are the ones trying to threaten me about this non-existent "debt". Go and look up Jopson v Homeguard Services Ltd, saddos.  Oh, while you're at it, go and look up your Subject Access Request obligations - we all know how you ballsed that up way back in January to March. Dear, dear, dear - you couldn't resist adding your £70 Unicorn Food Tax, you greedy gets.  Judges don't like these made-up charges, do they? You can either drop this foolishness now or get a hell of a hammering in court.  Both are fine with me.  Summer is coming up and I would love a holiday at your expense after claiming an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g). I look forward to your deafening silence.   That should show them you're not afraid of them and draw their attention to their having legal problems of their own with the SAR.  If they have any sense they'll crawl back under their stone and leave you in peace.  Over the next couple of days invest in a 2nd class stamp (all they are worth) and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
    • Okay please go through the disclosure very carefully. I suggest that you use the technique broadly in line with the advice we give on preparing your court bundle. You want to know what is there – but also very importantly you want to know what is not there. For instance, the email that they said they sent you before responding to the SAR – did you see that? Is there any trace of of the phone call that you made to the woman who didn't know anything about SAR's? On what basis was the £50 sent to you? Was it unilateral or did they offer it and you accepted it on some condition? When did they send you this £50 cheque? Have you banked it? Also, I think that we need to start understanding what you have lost here. Have you lost any money – and if so how much? Send the SAR to your bank as advised above
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ESA appeal query


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5032 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello and thank you for joining the forum.

 

Most people appeal using the GL24 form that should have come with your decision letter, although you can write your own letter. I would base the letter on the information requested in the form, if you feel it fits.

 

I have a 'sticky' at the top of the forum about appeals and tribunals, can't remember the new title.

 

Here's a link.

 

Appealing or going to a Tribunal? Some useful information

 

Please post if you have other questions.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Libra, I've just answered your duplicate post on happyhamr's thread. I see you're a newbie and just wanted to say that CAG don't like duplicate threads and you my find yourself edited by the site team. I'm not one of them, just a humble cagger trying to explain.

 

If you need more information having read my sticky, I suggest you start your own thread on here.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No need to apologise, I got loads wrong when I joined :).

 

If you want to start your own thread, click on the red triangle at the bottom of your initial post and ask the site team to start one for you. Give them a title if you can think of one, otherwise they'll dream one up for you.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

My advice to you, likelylibra2006 is that if you have enough time and you are sure that you should have got at least 15 points from the descriptors, try to get some evidence from your doctor to support your appeal and send it with your appeal letter. Make sure that you are specific about the reason that you disagree with the decision.

 

If you are not specific, and if you do not include evidence from your GP or hospital consultant (even a supporting letter from them) then in all likelihood the DWP will not revise their decision but send it on to the appeals Tribunal which could drag on for months.

 

Bear in mind though that there is a time limit of 1 month from the decision letter for you to send in your appeal. If you are running out of time, then send in your letter straight away and get the supporting evidence later.

If my posts have been helpful, please click the star icon and add to my reputation points. Thanks! :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

My advice to you, likelylibra2006 is that if you have enough time and you are sure that you should have got at least 15 points from the descriptors, try to get some evidence from your doctor to support your appeal and send it with your appeal letter. Make sure that you are specific about the reason that you disagree with the decision.

 

If you are not specific, and if you do not include evidence from your GP or hospital consultant (even a supporting letter from them) then in all likelihood the DWP will not revise their decision but send it on to the appeals Tribunal which could drag on for months.

 

Bear in mind though that there is a time limit of 1 month from the decision letter for you to send in your appeal. If you are running out of time, then send in your letter straight away and get the supporting evidence later.

 

Hi, just a word of warning, in my case and others that I know about, they give you little if no time to submit any further evidence for it to be re-considered before it goes off to the Tribunal.

 

In my case the date of the decision was 10th Februry 2010, the date I received the notification that I had failed was 24th February 2010. The appeal was lodged on the 10th March 2010, and the reconsideration took place on the 16th March 2010. I was then told that any further evidence that was sent in would be considered by the Tribunal not the DWP!

So it seems that if the evidence isn't enclosed with the appeal, it could be another 9 months before it is sorted out.

Edited by ANDYANDFLO
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm writing a letter of appeal re my ESA decision.

 

I've been advised all I need to put in the letter of appeal is that I am appealing against the DWP's decision without listing any specific grounds...is this correct???

 

You have been misadvised. An Appeal has to be "duly made" otherwise the Tribunals Service do not have to accept it. For a claim to be "duly made" there is certain information that you have to provide. One of these is that you have to give the reason why you disagree with the decision. If you don't give a reason the DWP will write to request grounds be provided within 14 days. If you still don't provide grounds they will then contact the Tribunals Service to advise that the appeal is not duly made as no grounds have been given. The tribunal service will then decide if the appeal can go ahead. In cases where no grounds are provided, the Tribunals Service will not accept the appeal.

 

Regulation 33 (1) © of the Decision and Appeals regulations 1999 requires that grounds are given in making an appeal.

 

You can submit evidence later if you can't source it immediately - just advise when you appeal that you will be forwarding further supporting evidence.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The grounds I have given in my appeal letter are that I believe I should have scored 15 points or more at the WCA "medical" and that information supplied at the "medical" were overlooked...is this adequate? Also I have been advised its a right of appeal to the tribunal which the DWP cannot refuse?

 

Also I have not asked the DWP to overturn their decision (apparently a waste of time!!) but requested to go straight to the tribunal...your thoughts please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds a fair start.

It's often expedient to go straight to a tribunal request. This is because, as part of that process, a DWP decision maker will re-examine the case anyway.

Best wishes

Rae

Link to post
Share on other sites

Provided you've been specific about what you feel was erroneous I can see no problem.

If the DWP 'refuse to forward' your appeal then that is very good news indeed! The only reason they will not forward your appeal to the tribunal service is if they read your submision, re-examine the case and completely agree with you. :)

Best wishes

Rae

Link to post
Share on other sites

Roughly speaking it's about 6 - 9 months. So, plenty of time to gather any extra supporting evidence to send off to the tribunal service...

Best wishes

Rae

 

NB: Don't forget that, whilst you will get the assessment rate of ESA throughout this process, you do need to continue sending in your [un]fit notes!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The grounds I have given in my appeal letter are that I believe I should have scored 15 points or more at the WCA "medical" and that information supplied at the "medical" were overlooked...is this adequate? Also I have been advised its a right of appeal to the tribunal which the DWP cannot refuse?

 

Also I have not asked the DWP to overturn their decision (apparently a waste of time!!) but requested to go straight to the tribunal...your thoughts please?

 

Those grounds are sufficient in your GL24 or appeal letter, yes. The DWP cannot refuse your appeal - but the Tribunals Service can. This is why the DWP would write to you first to obtain grounds if you hadn't supplied them. Then, if you still didn't provide grounds they have to inform the Tribunals Service who will decide whether to admit or refuse the appeal.

 

The DWP have to reconsider the case and have to overturn the decision if there is enough evidence that the original decision was wrong. If the decision is not overturned or is overturned but not in your favour, the appeal will continue. If the DWP do revise the decision, the appeal will lapse and that is the end of the appeals process - though there are fresh rights of appeal against a new decision. Reconsideration is an integral part of the appeals process and the Tribunals Service will not accept an appeal from the DWP where no reconsideration has taken place.

 

The DWP must check that the appeal is duly made, and if not so, contact the claimant or rep to provide information to make the appeal duly made, then if appropriate offer an explanation, then reconsider the decision then prepare a submission and then send it all to the Tribunal Service. That is a basic explanation of the process but there is more to it than that. If any part of the process is incomplete, the Tribunal Service cannot continue the appeal until it is done.

 

The DWP will send a copy of the submission to you as well if the appeal continues (i.e if they don't revise in your favour). Once you have this, you know that the case has gone to the Tribunal Service. Read through the submission with a fine tooth comb, and address any points in the decision which are contradictory to the facts or to the law, and you then make your own submission to the Tribunal Service along with any further evidence. The Tribunal will send you an enquiry form to complete shortly after they receive the submission.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...