Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Your attachment showing the cinema parking restrictions seems crystal clear. Let's see what the photos turn up.
    • Meter certification periods re given in The Meters (Certification) Regulations 1998, Schedule 4. From there you can check if they are correct about your specific meter .. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1998/1566/schedule/4 If they're telling porkies then you have e clear grounds to tell them to take  hike. If they're correct or if you haven't been able to confirm then you have  few options. You could just keep fobbing them off. In general Octopus can't keep up with demand for smart meters. It took 9 months to get our. So they may not push too hard. Or ask if you can install your own choice of meter. The Electricity Act 1989 cover this in Schedule 7 (2) and (2A) https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1989/29/schedule/7 Or fight the them and their enforcement. Or go off supply.
    • We received a copy of the completed Directions Questionnaire (N181) from the solicitors along with a draft copy of their directions. I am on a course today so can upload over the weekend if needed. By 4pm on 16th May both parties must each give standard disclosure of documents by way of list by category. By 4pm on 30th May any request for inspection or copies of docs must be made and compiled 14 days thereafter. I will provide more over the weekend.
    • Have you asked for advice from your students union people? HB
    • I (and other respondents) always advise “not getting caught in a lie” it hardens their response. Why would they now believe protestations of remorse and “I won’t do it again” if they've already seen you'd lie and say it was a one-off when it wasn't..  You can try approaching the prosecutor on the day, but "I wouldn't hold my breath" …..  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Advice re Fraud transaction on my Abbey current account


yubnub
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5029 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi All,

 

I apologise if this is not the correct section to post this query.

 

My missus has recently noticed 4 transaction on her Abbey current account that have not been made nor authourized by us.

 

The only card linked to this account is a Abbey visa debit card.

 

We phoned abbey to advise them that we did not carry out these transactions. They said that they will mark them as "disputed"

 

One week later we have received aletter informing us to return the goods that were damaged/not as described and contact paypal and follow their proceedures to get the matters sorted.

 

They were baniong on about paypal when we were initially reporing the transaction which I felt was odd. We stressed to them that we do not have a paypal account.

 

i am not to sure what bit of the :

 

we have note made/placed these orders

there are no goods

we do not have a paypal account

 

they do not understand.

 

its like dealing with a brick wall - in fairness that may be a bit harsh towards the inteligence levels of brick walls.

 

Any advice on what our best cause of action is.

 

We tried phoning them to explain that they seem to have the "wrong end of the stick" and we felt the transactions were fraud.

 

they just then said "oh you will have to put it in writing"

 

i have started to pen a letter however any suggestions/legal snippeds to put in etc would be welcomed,

 

cheers

 

YUB

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi yub,

 

Didn't their system alert you?

 

Fraud Monitoring: Santander

 

I would stick to the facts and pursue it from their, send the letter to their fraud department. Once you've done that, if you get no joy report back. I think they will refund no problems. Point out that you have no Paypal account, give them permission to check.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ask to speak to their fraud section

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi both,

 

during our last call we did get them to acknolege that the transactions were fraud.

 

However they would not transfer us to the fraud dept - just the "put it in writing" line

 

generally speaking what if any comeback do we have bearing in mind this is a debit card not credit.

 

I work in retail and we get the dreaded "charge back" letters from our bank. if we can not prove in 14 days (with paper trail evidence) that the goods went to the registered address and were signed for etc we lose our money and it gets refunded.

 

this is what we want to get moving with these transactions,

 

thanks again,

 

YUB

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm thinking if you start 'charge back' they will think your carrying out a fraud, as you stated that the transactions weren't carried out by you.

 

hi both,

 

during our last call we did get them to acknolege that the transactions were fraud.

 

However they would not transfer us to the fraud dept - just the "put it in writing" line

 

generally speaking what if any comeback do we have bearing in mind this is a debit card not credit.

 

I work in retail and we get the dreaded "charge back" letters from our bank. if we can not prove in 14 days (with paper trail evidence) that the goods went to the registered address and were signed for etc we lose our money and it gets refunded.

 

this is what we want to get moving with these transactions,

 

thanks again,

 

YUB

Link to post
Share on other sites

cancel the card ! use the card cancel number on that website above.

 

 

when they ask why - tell them you have had several un-auth transactions that they are doing nothing about and you do not want anymore.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm thinking if you start 'charge back' they will think your carrying out a fraud, as you stated that the transactions weren't carried out by you.

 

Hi,

 

i use the term "charge back" generically as the letters at work we receive come from the "charge back" section.

 

As a retailer we are told that unless we post only to the registered card address and get a signature or we get a full pass with verified by via / secure mastercard etc then we are liable if a transaction gets queried. This is why I use that term.

 

we did not make these orders/purchases and I know that as a result the vendors concerned could not provide the relevent paperwork to satisfy abank.

 

All I want is the monies to be returned to our account

 

cheers

 

YUB

Link to post
Share on other sites

cancel the card ! use the card cancel number on that website above.

 

 

when they ask why - tell them you have had several un-auth transactions that they are doing nothing about and you do not want anymore.

 

dx

 

 

Hi,

 

we did cancel it last week whilst we were on the phone reporting the transactions. The new card has arrived and is now in use,

 

thanks,

 

YUB

Link to post
Share on other sites

don't think you can charge back on debit vard?

 

ddx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

don't think you can charge back on debit vard?

 

ddx

 

I think you are correct,

 

Any idea what potentially happens then?

 

is my money gone?

 

cheers

 

YUB

Link to post
Share on other sites

The other thing you can do is report it to the police, see if you can get a crime reference number that you can include in your letter. I think you have a fear of not being believed, but you need to get this letter off sharpish, just follow their procedures.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you are correct,

 

Any idea what potentially happens then?

 

is my money gone?

 

cheers

 

YUB

 

no you'll get it back

just chargeback is not an option

 

sorry

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the input.

 

I will get the letter off to them tomorrow stating that we did not make these orders/payments,

 

Will have to see what they come back with once they have the letter with all the facts,

 

thanks again,

 

YUB

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...