Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • How was the "receiver" appointed and what is their role? Appointed by the lender under the terms of their security on the loan (sometimes referred to as "LPA Receiver")? Or are they acting for you in insolveny? What's the current role of the agent?
    • Wait for more replies, but that letter to me can be interpreted as a letter before action. Ignoring it can have consequences. The court to impose sanctions for failure in responding to a letter of claim.
    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

*Capquest and Limitation Act bluff?*


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5028 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I'm helping a friend who is being written to by Capquest for a big loan of 25,000 from Bank of Scotland

 

This loan was border line he tells me about 6 years and he defaulted on it and made no payments or contact etc.....I send them a limitation Act letter to which they have replied that the account was opened on the 25/10/04

 

Just a couple of months within the 6 years......A bluff by them???

 

I have searched his credit file on Experian and there is no details or record of this loan? No couty court Judgement nothing?

 

I will be looking at his Equifax file on Monday/Tuesday maybe it would be on there?

 

Any views on this or my next letter please or should i continue with the Limitation act angle or possible go with this letter below?

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Re:− Account/Reference Number

 

This letter is a formal request pursuant to s.77/78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. I require you to provide me with a true copy of the credit agreement relating to the above account, together with any other documentation the Act requires you to provide.

 

I expect you to comply fully and properly with this request, within the statutory time limit. You are reminded that should you fail to comply with my request, the provisions of s.77 will apply.

 

If it is your view that you are not the creditor, s.175 of the CCA 1974 applies in the case of a simple assignment, and places a duty upon you to pass this request to the creditor. In the case of an absolute assignment, you are a creditor as defined by s.189. If you contend that you purchased the rights but not the duties of any agreement, you are reminded that s.189 of the Act is clear that an assignment is of both rights and duties.

 

Your attention is drawn to ss.5(2), 3(b),6 and 7 of the Consumer Protection From Unfair Tradinglink3.gif Regulations 2008 (CPUTR).

 

I enclose a postal order in the sum of £1.00, which is the statutory fee. Note that these funds are not to be used for any other purpose.

 

If you are unable to comply fully and properly with this request, you should confirm this in writing at the earliest opportunity, and certainly within the statutory time limit for compliance, and return the fee.

 

We look forward to hearing from you.

 

Yours faithfully

Mr A N Other

Edited by kathleenbilly
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 77
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

You definitely want a copy of the agreement but you also want to know what payments were made as SB starts from the date of the last payment. I would send the BOS an SAR to get all the details on the account and you will get a copy of the agreement in the SAR.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly thanks for the reply,

 

Correct me if i'm wrong but don't all banks seek a County Court Judgement when a loan is not paid?

 

Given the amount i'm sure they would of sought a County Court Judgement and this would of shown on Experian.

 

I really want to see if it's on Equifax in any way...''

 

If this is not shown on the credit files than i'm presuming the 6 years have passed? hense no record of it?

 

Then maybe the Limitation Act does apply and they are bluffing.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why not make a subject access request under data protection to BOS. They should provide all the information that your friend needs, including copies of statements, CCA, default notice, notice of assignment.

 

Your friend could send this letter to the relevant BOS address by recorded delivery, addressed to the Data Protection/Compliance officer. They would need to include a £10 postal order.

 

Data Protection Act 1998

Subject Access Request

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

 

ACCOUNT NUMBER: xxxxxxxxx

 

 

Please supply me with all data that you hold on me. This includes in particular, but is not limited to, the following:-

 

 

1. The original signed, executed credit agreement and any terms and conditions that applied to the account at the time of default and at the time the account was opened.

 

2. Transcriptions of all telephone conversations recorded and any notes made in relation to telephone conversations by your company, or by any previous creditor

 

3. Where there has been any event in my account history over this period which has required manual intervention by any person, I require disclosure of any indication or notes which have either caused or resulted in that manual intervention, or other evidence of that manual intervention in relation to my account formerly held with ORIGINAL CREDITOR.

 

4. True copies of any notice of assignment and/or default notice or enforcement notice that you or the original creditor sent me, with a copy of any proof of postage that you hold.

 

5. Documents relating to any insurance added to the account, including the insurance contract and terms and conditions, date it was added and deleted (if applicable).

 

6. Details of any collection charges added to the account; specifically, the date it was levied, the amount of the charge, a detailed financial breakdown of how the charge was calculated, and what the charge covers.

 

7. Specific details of the fees/charges levied by any other agency in respect of this account and a detailed breakdown of said fees/charges and what each charge relates to and on what date said fees/charges were levied.

 

8. A genuine copy of any notice of fair use of my data as required by the Data Protection Act 1998

 

9. A list of third party agencies to whom you have disclosed my personal data and a summary of the nature of the information you have disclosed.

 

10. Copies of statements for the entire duration of the credit agreement.

 

 

I enclose the statutory maximum fee of £10. You have 40 days in which to comply.

 

If there is specific information which you require in order to satisfy yourself as to my identity, please let me know by return. However, please note that the above address is the one which you normally use to communicate my private business to me and which you have hitherto found to be acceptable.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

 

print but don't sign your name

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Correct me if i'm wrong but don't all banks seek a County Court Judgement when a loan is not paid? Not automatic. They probably have so many accounts in default at anyone time, they would constantly be submitting claims.

 

Given the amount i'm sure they would of sought a County Court Judgement and this would of shown on Experian. If they issued a default notice, then yes I would have expected it to have appeared. If not on there, may be a mistake that default never registered or 6 years have passed.

 

Then maybe the Limitation Act does apply and they are bluffing..... They wound not admit if statute barred. If BOS have provided incorrect/unclear information, then CapQuest may be proceeding on a false basis.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Capquest relied saying the account was opened on the 25/10/04 there letter was brief.

 

so not statute barred, in simple terms i could just sit it out for a few months and then it will be statute barred according to there own information to me.

 

I still think there are bluffing they are well know for buying debts older than 6 years.

 

The fact the debt is not shown on Experian is a good sign if not on Equifax which i will see in the next fews days then clearly it's passed the 6 year date,

 

Thats my guess could have this rapped up by next week. It's for them to prove the debt is owing or not statue barred as they say by providing me the information to prove it ie: the credit agreement i don't see why i need to do anymore at this stage until i see what they have first, (maybe nothing) :cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is up to you. But Capquest have been known to suddenly issue a statutory demand with a view to applying for bankruptcy. This can lead to a mad rush to get hold of information to support defending this action.

 

Your friend would be wise to submit the subject access request to BOS, to get hold of all the information. Atleast then they can use the information to help them prepare and maybe if the details help, tell them to get lost.

 

Don't be worried about BOS advising CapQuest of the SAR. They won't, as they receive the requests on a daily basis and as they take awhile to get done, they just get on with it. They haven''t got the time to find out what is happening with the debt and to start making phone calls. This is not their job function anyway, in the compliance dept where these requests are handled.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mmmm,

 

i hear you and to be fair he has just in the last year brought a house,

 

So maybe i will seek the information so long as it does not have any detrimental effect or be passed to Capquest in any way then it would be a positive move.

 

thank you for the advice on that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The SAR request is specifically to BOS, so this is about data they have controlled, nothing to do with anyone else.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

It will the address shown on the BOS loan details, not the individual branch that dealt with the application. I think this is Bank of Scotland

PO Box 23581

Edinburgh

EH1 1WH

 

Postal order can be made payable to Bank of Scotland.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK right i see thank you.

 

I will request this information from them on Monday sending the letter in the post.

 

I will report back and let you know the outcome, in the meantime many thanks again for your time and advice on this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it's not on Experian,

 

So i doubt it will be on Equifax.

 

But i will check and confirm this in the next few days.

 

If it is not then it has never been issued or has fallen off due to being over 6 years old.

 

Yes it is still valid and you will always owe the amount but given the limitation act it can no longer be recovered if 6 years with no acknowledge has been made to pay or confirm the debt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Capquest Bluff....

 

 

I have just be able to check the Equifax Credit File and have found no trace or details of any loan mentioned by Capquest.

 

So no details on Experian and now nothing on Equifax.

 

So clearly the loan default has passed the 6 years.

 

The interesting part i would ask you if your looking in,

 

Capquest wrote back to me after i sent them a Limitations Act Letter afew day ago saying the debt was not statue Barred and that the account was opened on the 25th October 2004....

 

If that's when it was opened then the non-payment and subsequent default of not paying the loan would of been even later than the opening of the account so this would be well within the 6 years but it's not on the credit files of Equifax/Experian.

 

So now i have this information off my friends file i would like to call them stating i know nothing of this debt given i have checked my file etc.

 

I would then ask them to provide me with evidence of a debt to which i do not acknowledge or have any details of.

 

Would this is a good idea or should i write another letter if so what letter would be suitable?

Link to post
Share on other sites

One thing you need to look at is whether your friend has moved in the past 6 years ago and whether the credit files have picked up everything from each address.

 

The only way to be sure that he doesn't have a CCJ is by using the Registry Trust website to check every address he's lived at over the past 6-7 years. This isn't cheap (£8 per search) and it wouldn't pick up a CCJ older than 6 years.

 

As others have suggested SARNing BOS and using the CCA should give you all the information you need. Does your friend have bank statements from that period?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes he has moved two times within 6 years and the loan was taken out at a particular address a point to note: he has said he did see this loan on his file a couple of years ago but clearly now it has gone,

 

I'm going to send this letter to Capquest below and see what they have got...

 

No debt is acknowledged to you. You have contacted me regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself.

I would point out that under the Limitation Act 1980 Section 5 “an action founded on simple contract shall not be brought after the expiration of six years from the date on which the cause of action accrued.” If your telephone calls continue,they will be taken as HARRASSMENT under PROTECTION FROM HARASSMENT ACT 1997. This is a CRIMINAL Act which can lead to 6 months imprisonment and/or a level 5 fine. I shall therefore report you personally to the police.

The last payment or acknowledgement of this debt was made over six years ago and no further acknowledgement or payment has been made since that time. Unless you can provide evidence of payment or written contact from me in the relevant period under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, I suggest that you are no longer able to take any court action against me to recover the alleged amount claimed.

I await your written confirmation that no further contact will be made concerning the above account and confirmation that this matter is now closed. If you do not supply such confirmation, I will be making a complaint to the statutory authorities.

I look forward to your reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any letters you send to them should be by recorded delivery, otherwise they might say they didn't get it ;)

Keep a copy of the letter and check on the royalmail website a few days later to print off the signed for receipt - keep that with your copy of the letter in case you need to prove they received it.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This really is a strange one,

 

My friend has found and now given me all the original paperwork and the credit agreement.

 

The date Capquest gave is correct 25th October 2004 is when the credit agreement was signed although i have the customer copy which does not have his signature on but has the signature of the bank on there.

 

So it's within the 6 years by a few months. So the limitation act does not apply.

 

Strange how there is no detail or record on his credit files no defaults no CCJ's we talking a 25,000 debt weird, the guy got a morgage last year with no issues at all.

 

So i know Capquest don't have the credit agreement as they would of said or at least sent me a copy to prove it. So i will write requesting confirmation and proof of the debt unless anyone has any other idea's on how best approach this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Best to throw it in dispute regarding the CCA, drag it out until 25th October (very easily done) Then hit them with the Statue Barred letter.

These are video links to show how I deal with Debt Collectors.

 

Fly fishing for C.A.R.S

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=zPtzK8FqE6k&feature=related

 

Frederickson International don't accept my card type

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=eiZBULlWW6Q&feature=related

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes i can see his payments he made two or three monthly then defaulted so this would take us into March 2005

 

These payments were made by direct debit but i doubt they will have that information (again no details or record on his credit files????)

 

I will send them this letter below is this the one you are talking about?

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Re:− Reference Number 31122233

 

This letter is a formal request pursuant to s.77/78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. I require you to provide me with a true copy of the credit agreement relating to the above account, together with any other documentation the Act requires you to provide.

 

I expect you to comply fully and properly with this request, within the statutory time limit. You are reminded that should you fail to comply with my request, the provisions of s.77 will apply.

 

If it is your view that you are not the creditor, s.175 of the CCA 1974 applies in the case of a simple assignment, and places a duty upon you to pass this request to the creditor. In the case of an absolute assignment, you are a creditor as defined by s.189. If you contend that you purchased the rights but not the duties of any agreement, you are reminded that s.189 of the Act is clear that an assignment is of both rights and duties.

 

Your attention is drawn to ss.5(2), 3(b),6 and 7 of the Consumer Protection From Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 (CPUTR).

 

I enclose a postal order in the sum of £1.00, which is the statutory fee. Note that these funds are not to be used for any other purpose.

 

If you are unable to comply fully and properly with this request, you should confirm this in writing at the earliest opportunity, and certainly within the statutory time limit for compliance, and return the fee.

 

We look forward to hearing from you.

 

 

Yours faithfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...