Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Using the Freedom of Information Act to get details of Consumer Claims brought - and their results


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5034 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

It would be interesting to use the Freedom of Information Act to get details from the Ministry of Justice around the number of claims raised by a certain DCA and then the number of those claims that were withdrawn before being heard.

 

I suspect the figures wouldn't read well, in that most of them probably result in CCJ's against folk with lesser knowledge!

 

Viva la CAG!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

could that be done? maybe we should gather various court stats so caggers know what they are facing?

 

some may seem discouraging e.g. number of cases that go to CCJ or are lost by debtors but in another light it could be seen to be encouraging as it simply confirms that creditors play a numbers game whereby they intimidate through action and legal process most debtors who don't want to see things through at court and as such creditors are often bluffing when they take action..so every reason to fight to the end in many cases.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would be interesting to use the Freedom of Information Act to get details from the Ministry of Justice around the number of claims raised by a certain DCA and then the number of those claims that were withdrawn before being heard.

 

I suspect the figures wouldn't read well, in that most of them probably result in CCJ's against folk with lesser knowledge!

 

Viva la CAG!

 

I have no doubt that the MoJ will just say they do not collect or collate that metric. I doubt they even keep a track of how many cases are discontinued.

 

Could be worth a punt tho ;-)

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, if my court had to call ME to find out how many claims I was dealing with, I'm not sure there's much hope for accurate statistics coming out of HMCS.

 

On the other hand....... Heather Brooke lit the fuse on the MP expenses scandal by pursuing the Freedom of Information Act.....

 

As CAR has said VIVA LA CAG!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would be interesting to use the Freedom of Information Act to get details from the Ministry of Justice around the number of claims raised by a certain DCA and then the number of those claims that were withdrawn before being heard.

 

I suspect the figures wouldn't read well, in that most of them probably result in CCJ's against folk with lesser knowledge!

 

Viva la CAG!

 

Perhaps now is the time to start asking them, maybe get a letter template done and encourage every CAG member to write to the Ministry of Justice, can you still go onto the No. 10 website and start a signature campaign.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps now is the time to start asking them, maybe get a letter template done and encourage every CAG member to write to the Ministry of Justice, can you still go onto the No. 10 website and start a signature campaign.

 

With the greatest of respect to your intentions, I don't think this should be the case. FOI requests should only be used in certain circumstances, and submitting lots of requests from different members could mean they argue that the effort in getting the data together isn't in balance with the interests of the Act. What is needed is one person (doesn't have to be me ;)) to submit a request for this data and then for that to be shared with CAGgers.

 

No 10 petitions are available online, yes, but what is your petition? :confused:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

With the greatest of respect to your intentions, I don't think this should be the case. FOI requests should only be used in certain circumstances, and submitting lots of requests from different members could mean they argue that the effort in getting the data together isn't in balance with the interests of the Act. What is needed is one person (doesn't have to be me ;)) to submit a request for this data and then for that to be shared with CAGgers.

 

No 10 petitions are available online, yes, but what is your petition? :confused:

 

 

Your probably right:

 

The Freedom of Information Act gives you the right to obtain information held by public authorities unless there are good reasons to keep it confidential.

 

I can think of a large number of banks/DCAs/solicitors who would come up with any number of good reasons.

 

Could CAG, as an organisation, not request it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Freedom of Information Act gives you the right to obtain information held by public authorities unless there are good reasons to keep it confidential.

 

I can think of a large number of banks/DCAs/solicitors who would come up with any number of good reasons.

 

And that would be? :lol:

 

Could CAG, as an organisation, not request it?

 

Anyone can make a FOI request ;)

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

And that would be? :lol:

 

Where would one start.

 

Anyone can make a FOI request ;)

 

Rather than, as you said "submitting lots of requests from different members could mean they argue that the effort in getting the data together isn't in balance with the interests of the Act".

 

Would a single request from CAG be morely likely to get a result.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Where would one start.

 

 

 

Rather than, as you said "submitting lots of requests from different members could mean they argue that the effort in getting the data together isn't in balance with the interests of the Act".

 

Would a single request from CAG be morely likely to get a result.

 

Nope, as an individual would get the same response ;)

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2007/08 - Total claims issue in England & Wales

893,860

 

of which 267,217 were housing & recovery of land

 

leaving 626,643

 

allocated to small claims 91,767

allocated to fast track 50,228

allocated to multi track 25,947

 

Settlements after allocation

Fast track 39,041

Multi track 22,698

 

Cases heard

Small claims 51,896

Fast track 11,700

Multi track 4,177

 

Attachments of earnings granted 76,890

 

Appeals from District Judges 2,939

Link to post
Share on other sites

Total UK personal debt

UK banks and building societies wrote off £9.6bn of loans to individuals in the last 12 months to end Q1 2010. In Q1 2010 they wrote off £2.13bn (£1.25bn of that was credit card debt). This amounts to a write-off of £23.35m a day.

 

Total UK personal debt at the end of May 2010 stood at £1,460bn. The twelve-month growth increased to 0.9%. Individuals owe more than what the whole country produces in a year.

Total lending in May 2010 rose by £1.5bn; secured lending increased by £1.2bn in the month; consumer credit lending increased by £0.3bn (total lending in Jan 2008 grew by £8.4bn).

Total secured lending on dwellings at the end of May 2010 stood at £1,241bn. The twelve-month growth rate rose to 1.1%.

Total consumer credit lending to individuals at the end of May 2010 was £220bn. The annual growth rate of consumer credit rose by 0.1% to 0.0%.

Average household debt in the UK is ~ £8,716 (excluding mortgages). This figure increases to £18,159 if the average is based on the number of households who actually have some form of unsecured loan.

Average household debt in the UK is ~ £57,944 (including mortgages).

If you add to this the March 2010 budget report figure for public sector net debt (PSND) expected in 2015-16 (excluding financial interventions) then this figure rises to £110,166 per household.

Average owed by every UK adult is ~ £30,000 (including mortgages). This is 126% of average earnings.

Average outstanding mortgage for the 11.4m households who currently have mortgages now stands at ~ £108,972.

Britain's interest repayments on personal debt were £67.5bn in the last 12months. The average interest paid by each household on their total debt is approximately £2,679 each year. According to PwC the average household will need to spend approximately 15% of net income purely to service the interest payments arising from this debt.

Average consumer borrowing via credit cards, motor and retail finance deals, overdrafts and unsecured personal loans has risen to £4,513 per average UK adult at the end of May 2010.

Statistical Sources - Unless otherwise indicated statistics in the “Total UK personal debt” section are calculated by Credit Action - primarily using the Bank of England's debt figures.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2007/08 - Total claims issue in England & Wales

893,860

 

of which 267,217 were housing & recovery of land

 

leaving 626,643

 

allocated to small claims 91,767

allocated to fast track 50,228

allocated to multi track 25,947

 

Settlements after allocation

Fast track 39,041

Multi track 22,698

 

Cases heard

Small claims 51,896

Fast track 11,700

Multi track 4,177

 

Attachments of earnings granted 76,890

 

Appeals from District Judges 2,939

 

Hi MD,

 

All amazing stats. Do you mind if I make a tiny but polite observation?

 

This information (and Blondie, Car, Martin, Nodefuallts and Rhia's posts) is way too valuable to get buried on this thread, it desreves to be more accessible. What do you think about starting a new thread on this topic? Bet it would be v effective (i.e., provocative and mobilising!).....

 

Martel

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Martel, can't add anything to your threads but following with interest and support.

Keep fighting!

 

Cym! Always great to hear from you!! Your support is much appreciated! Hoping all is well with you.....MX

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bing!

 

New thread ;)

 

Doh!! Well, I DID say it would be a good idea!!

 

Honestly, I must get out more. Or get around CAG more.

 

Will watch this one.....

 

Good for you!

 

MXX

Edited by Martel
misspelling
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi MD,

 

All amazing stats. Do you mind if I make a tiny but polite observation?

 

This information (and Blondie, Car, Martin, Nodefuallts and Rhia's posts) is way too valuable to get buried on this thread, it desreves to be more accessible. What do you think about starting a new thread on this topic? Bet it would be v effective (i.e., provocative and mobilising!).....

 

Martel

 

Excellent idea, and thank you car2403 (stops someone's thread being hijacked).

 

Wonder when 2008/09 figures will be available - bet they don't make pretty reading.

 

B40

Link to post
Share on other sites

IMHO, I feel it would be best to enquire of the courts concerned which cases went to the claimant or the defendant.

You can then determine maybe which Judge is biased one way or tother.

 

The FOI request, is useful ( Ive used it in the US ), because it puts the officials to task.).

But it should be used sparingly and carefully worded to winkle pick exactly what information you want, so be specific if you ever use it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How about using these stats in a letter to our mp's.

 

All the talk is about austerity measures so surely it would save a fortune in legal aid/help bills and maybe the odd judge redundancy if it were made compulsory to include a verified copy of the agreement where a claim is base upon an agreement.

After all this is what cpr already states it just isn't enforced sternly enough.

Simples me thinks?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...