Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Should this ever happen to me, I will make an appeal at the first stage to avoid any problems that may occur at a later stage. Although, any individual in a similar position should decide for themselves what they think is an appropriate course of action. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Reasonable adjustment


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5032 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am representing a friend in work who has wrote a letter to the hr department requesting a reasonable adjustment to his working hours.

 

He is suffering with depression and has been for the past 18 months. He has missed a number of shifts as his depression gets worse whilst working 2pm-10pm. His request is to move his thurs and fr pm shifts to 6am-2pm.

 

After submitting his letter he has had a response from hr stating in line with company procedures, his case has been referred to the occupational health department where they will review the information provided in the letter and information provided at previous attendance review meetings.

 

my question is can the hr department forward personal details to the occupational health without consent?

 

what qualifications do a occupational health advisor need before they can asses somebody with depression?

 

any other advice welcome

 

many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

no he didnt see the form. he sent his letter to hr on the 7th july and got a reply from hr via letter telling him that this info has been sent to occupational health. hr are awaiting a report from occupational health on the best way to procced. the letter also says occupational health may also contact him

Link to post
Share on other sites

You friend should asked HR for a copy of the form submitted to OH as soon as possible, as he want to know what they have put on it. I think the OH may contact him by phone. ;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks will advise the info be checked. should hr be requesting his own doctors report ? would occupational health be best qualified to deal with somebody with mental health problems?

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks will advise the info be checked. should hr be requesting his own doctors report ? would occupational health be best qualified to deal with somebody with mental health problems?

 

 

Hello, I'm not sure what you mean about the info being checked.

 

HR may well want to write to his GP or other adviser, but should not do so until he has signed a form consenting to them doing that. He will be able to see the report before it goes off to OH and will have the opportunity to comment.

 

I would suggest that OH should write to the doctor and deal with it medic to medic. Someone on the forum said that HR never ask the right questions.

 

OH is likely to be where you start and are probably the best-placed people in the company to deal with it. I saw an outside consultant and he was very good on mental stuff. At the end of the day, if you disagree with OH, you could ask the GP or preferably someone from the NHS Mental Health team to write to them. If he's been ill for that long, I would hope he's been seen by the Mental Health team.

 

Hope that helps a bit.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks honey bee and allwood. Are you saying that hr should not send anything to oh without my friend seeing whats in the report and giving his consent for it to be seen by oh?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I would like to respond iro HR referral to OH.

Usually an employee should be fully prepared to work with HR towards reaching a workable solution. The employer / employee contractual relationship is basically very simple:

An employee is contracted to work and the employer is contracted to remunerate that employee for that work. It is when variations to that relationship crop up, that these sorts of questions arise.

In my view, an employer (be that HR), has every right to refer an employee to OH and I would have difficulty understanding why an employee would have a problem with this, after all, the employer has a duty of care to ensure that the employee is fit to fulfill their contractual obligations.

Having said that, the employee has the right to see the OH referral letter. Equally, the employee has the right to agree or refuse, that OH contact and discuss the medical problem with the GP.

However, I must state that in the many, many Tribunals I have attended, it is of no help to the claimant when it can be shown by the employer, that they were obstructive in all matters OH-related. Obstruction can very easily be shown when the employee has refused consent to contact their GP, failed to attend OH appointments, etc.

My advise is that the employee is fully engaged in the OH referral, after all, if there is indeed a genuine problem (and I am not for one minute saying there isnt), then there should be no reason for the employee NOT to engage. HR cannot and never should, make any health-related decisions without solid OH advice.

Good luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks honey bee and allwood. Are you saying that hr should not send anything to oh without my friend seeing whats in the report and giving his consent for it to be seen by oh?

 

 

Just to be clear on this, your friend has no right to 'stop' the OH referral, and has not automatic right to 'consent' to an OH referral.

The only right they have is that they can see what the referral document includes as well as the right to see the resultant OH report.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are right regarding the OH however when my friend was referred to the OH in 2007 she did not know anything about it. She answered all he OH questions regarding her time off work with a serious injury.

 

Later my friend got to see the OH referral that was submitted by the manager and some of the information was incorrect on the form it said that my friend was a temporary employee which was not correct. Do not know what the manager though what was to be gained by putting that on the form as she knew perfectly well that my friend was a permanent employee with the company.:-(

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you sunflower for yor input

 

i agree with what you say and my friend is fully committed to seeing the oh.

 

i asked 2 questions at the start of this thread.

 

question 1 was the fact that hr sent his details without first asking my friend as this was personal information i wondered if consent was needed.

 

question 2 was do oh need to be specialised in the field of mental health

 

my friend needs help and will do all the company require to enable him stay in employment

 

thanks all

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi. I think I said earlier that I don't know if you'll get an OH person with mental knowledge, although it is part of workplace health. You would need to ask what qualifications they have and then check them out.

 

If a form was sent to OH, then it would be manners for your friend to see it, I don't know if there's a legal requirement. The referral could have been by phone. Is it an in-house department or an outside consultancy?

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

One would expect OH to be qualified certainly within the OH Advisory level - usually, anything they are unable to deal with, they would refer on to a medical practitioner. The role of OH is to assess whether there is anything within the work arena that could be contributing to the ill health, they also make recommendations towards supporting the employee back to full time employment.

 

In terms of your question in respect of whether the employee needs to give permission for the OH referral - the short answer is no. Why would they have a problem with a referral intended to help / assist them to better health?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

One would expect OH to be qualified certainly within the OH Advisory level - usually, anything they are unable to deal with, they would refer on to a medical practitioner. The role of OH is to assess whether there is anything within the work arena that could be contributing to the ill health, they also make recommendations towards supporting the employee back to full time employment.

 

In terms of your question in respect of whether the employee needs to give permission for the OH referral - the short answer is no. Why would they have a problem with a referral intended to help / assist them to better health?

 

What if OH has advised certain things to be done by the employer and they have not complied with it.

 

Also, 2 times manager has put wrong information one OH referral forms manager had put employee down as temporary although the employee had been with the company over 2 years, the second time it was DoB was incorrect surely they are fundamental things that mangers should get correct before any referral form is send to OH

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

The mistakes you refer to sound like bad administrative errors and I doubt they could have an impact on an OH assessment or recommendations. There is no reason the employee can't put these errors to right during the appointment. Dob and temporary vs permanent mistakes just sound sloppy, rather than deliberate attempts to derail a referral.

 

Of more importance is if certain measures are recommended by OH that are subsequently ignored by the employer: are we talking risk assessment, work station assessment, reduced hours, that sort of thing?

 

The employee should raise this formally and ask why the recommendations, which came through a referral THEY did, are not being actioned.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

The mistakes you refer to sound like bad administrative errors and I doubt they could have an impact on an OH assessment or recommendations. There is no reason the employee can't put these errors to right during the appointment. Dob and temporary vs permanent mistakes just sound sloppy, rather than deliberate attempts to derail a referral.

 

Of more importance is if certain measures are recommended by OH that are subsequently ignored by the employer: are we talking risk assessment, work station assessment, reduced hours, that sort of thing?

 

The employee should raise this formally and ask why the recommendations, which came through a referral THEY did, are not being actioned.

 

Hi Sunfl0wer, yes, I agree it must have been administrate errors but for it to happen twice is not good. also it is not alway possibile to put these erros right during the appointment as the employee would not be available of the errors if they do not see the OH referral in the first place.

 

The OH gave good recommendation but not carreid out by the employer also the employer dose not like giving reduced hrs. :???:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also if the employer was to let the employee see the form before it was submitted to the OH then s/he could confirm that all the personal details were correct and this help the employer and employee. 8-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks allwood, sunflower for your input

 

the reason i ask could hr sent his details without first asking my friend as this was personal information i wondered if consent was needed is due to data protection. if personal information is sent to a oh would consent be needed and indeed checked prior to information being disclosed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello colin813. As Sunflower and probably some others have suggested, I think you're barking up the wrong tree here about the personal information part of this. I don't think the point about the referral to OH is relevant, irritating as it may be. I would say the important part is your friend's medical problems rather than finding fault with the date of birth, etc. Sorry.

 

For what it's worth, I think you should be pursuing other avenues against this employer, as mentioned in previous posts.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

indeed thank you hunniebee. i am in total agreement with all comments and fully support the hr decision to refer to oh. This is the correct response to help my friend. i just think it would have been polite to seek permission rather than send a letter to notify of the referal.

 

thanks again all

Link to post
Share on other sites

The reason having the correct DoB on the OH form for the employee that is referred to them is because the OH may needs to contact the employee's GP therefore a correct DoB is important as GP's has lots of patiens of the same names and it would be essential that the GP has the correct DoB for their patiens to locate their records for the OH if needed. :(

Edited by Allwood
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...