Jump to content


Overhanging tree collision, thoughts please...


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5039 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all... I'm Representing at a Disciplinary tomorrow afternoon, I have all of

my bases covered so won't go in to much detail, I just want some last

thoughts about the subject of the accusation please...

 

Member has struck an overhead object on a narrow trunk road road at a

height of 11'10". At the point of collision he is on an Urban Clearway, the

road is marked out with lineage bringing traffic to the left and he is also

subject to a Mandatory Directional Arrow on a new traffic island forcing

traffic to the left. Tree (TRUNK) is overhanging by 30° going by the photo's

taken as evidence, the traffic island is clearly badly damaged by vehicles

taking evasive action and driving into it (plastic island), the tree trunk is

also heavily damaged by previous strikes.

 

Company are claiming Serious Misconduct, Driving Without Due Care and Attention.

Are trying to pass off a photo' of a single deck bus passing under tree which is 1' 7"

lower than truck.. As a previous warning exists Dismissal is an option..

 

Just thoughts please and last idea's, I'm not going into any more detail..

 

Thanks in advance, Dave.. :-)

Edited by diskmandave
typo..
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dave. So presumably there is no warning to the driver other than the evidence of many previous near misses? Not really familiar with such things, but isn't there a duty on the part of the Highways department to either construct a build-out or some other means of minimising collisions?

 

I would say it was very unfair to punish the driver if he could reasonably expect to drive down a carriageway deemed appropriate for that size of vehicle in every other way. Can't really add much to that - sorry. Hope the guy gets on OK though.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

if its impeaching the safe passage of legally allowed vehicles for that type of road, which it appears to do, then its a highways issue.

they do not have the legal right to Discipline him.

 

have you contacted the local traffic office or the highways commissioner to enquire about past notices?

 

if its beenthere XXX yrs then there should legally be a hieght restriction sign i think.

 

if its 'fallen' recently, how the hell can he be made responsible?

 

is it a road he has travelled before or any same vehicle on your fleet has gone down before?

 

all you need to prove is either there is no sign where there should be one or that it has moved of recent and even highways/traffic police are not aware it is a hazard.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...