Jump to content


Monument CCA


zingy
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5033 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Zingy,

 

If there are no grounds to dispute it, you should continue to pay unless you cannot afford to do so.

 

Are there any unlawful penalty charges or mis-sold PPI on the a/c which you can reclaim.

 

:)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Zingy,

 

If there are no grounds to dispute it, you should continue to pay unless you cannot afford to do so.

 

Are there any unlawful penalty charges or mis-sold PPI on the a/c which you can reclaim.

 

:)

Already done:wink:

 

I'll continue to pay them but see if they'll settle, in the end, to a 50% F&F.

 

 

Interesting, Dotty - I never knew that. But I think all of the different creditors seem call it something different on their statements, lol.

Edited by zingy

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the financial conditions are in fact the reverse of the signed document it would be enforceable.

 

 

Hmmm.... well, I've had a look at these two (the reply card and what they say was on the back of it), and I don't believe them to be of the same document. I've put them next to each other and measured the width and height of both and it doesn't seem as though they could have been part of the same document.

 

Is there anyway I could ask to view the original etc? And if not, what reply should I send?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Zingy,

 

The trouble is that, even if you think the Prescribed Terms were not on the back of the document, BC will not agree the a/c is in dispute.

 

They'll continue with collection activity themselves and will use Mercers, Calders and others to pursue the debt.

 

Take a look at the "dispute" threads in any forum. Certainly here in the BC forum, a huge number of threads reach an impasse that can last for months and years.

 

If the a/c is not kept up to date, they'll trash your credit rating, register defaults, etc. The matter is very rarely resolved in court because BC don't use the courts often. And you taking BC to court is not an option since the ruling of Carey v HSBC last winter.

 

:)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, Slick.

 

I understand what you're saying, but monument are already trashing my credit rating anyway by putting 'arrangement to pay' markers on it.

 

Think I'll keep up the monthly repayments, but try negotiating an F&F with them. The only thing I want to do is stop the AP markers on my file tbh as I have a 8 defaults on there already - so it's trashed for a good while anyhow.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...