Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
    • The streaming giant also said it added 9.3 million subscribers in the first three months of the year.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

SAR too late??


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5034 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Sorry reposting as I was in the wrong place...We have a small family run business that has been hard hit by the recession and seen our income reduce by over 50%. I have 5 creditors who I have communiacted with at all times regarding our situation and with the help of the CCCS we have set up a token payment for them all, in fact 2 have put us on a severe hardshiplink3.gif scheme. Only one of them wanted to take this further and took me to court for a ccj, (strangly enough it is the one we owe the least too just £5,100) this was awarded and I was told I must pay an increased amount of £18.00. I have paid this religiously and have all the receipts since that court case. They then went for a redetermination: We had a court hearing and I was asked could I pay in full I told the judge this was impossible, and I feared any further increase would upset our others creditors and the arrangement we have in place with them. The DJ said 'i sympathise but you can see these people cant wait 30 years for their money' He agreed to them applying for a charging order. This is due to be heard in 2 weeks and I am scared. The loan was taken out over 5 years ago and what I neglected to tell the judge (due to nerves) is that for the first 3 years I paid £50 a month payment protection plan to safeguard myself, almost £2000 for nothing!. As soon as things fell into hardship I applied for help with the PPIlink3.gif and was told it was no longer appropriate as I was no longer paying the full ammount?? (I had never missed a payment before that) This cannot be fair?? I now know I should have not admtted to the full amount at the first hearing but in times of stress I dont think I knew what I was doing. I also have this loan in my sole name and my partner is joint owner of our home, which is in negative equity. I just would like some help on how to approach the hearing and what, if anything to send in advance, Some one suggested sending a SAR is this possible just 2 weeks before having originally admitted the debt, which I regret but didnt understand. Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi badger220987

 

A SAR gives the creditor 40 days to send you all the data they have with regards to your account. The main reason that people send a SAR request is to request statements for the account so they can claim back all the

Penalty Charges on the account with interest for the last 6 years plus. People also claim back PPI if it's been mis-sold. I think you've mistaken a SAR request for a CCA request. A CCA request gives the creditor 14 days to respond with a True

copy of your CCA. If they fail to provide a copy then then you can put the account in dispute.

 

With regards to the charging order here's some info on charging orders and how to stop a charging order. The link is for info only, not a recommendation.

 

http://www.insolvencyhelpline.co.uk/debt_factsheets/charging_orders_in_the_county_court.php

 

There is a lot you can do to regain control, it might seem tough, but it is possible. Others will advise too.

 

http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/86-debt-collectors/581-cca-request-letter

 

So send a CCA Request to all your creditors,

Reclaim all Penalty and PPI charges with interest. The PPI must of been mis-sold, did they just add it or did you ask for it.

Edited by rebel11
Link to post
Share on other sites

They added it on I did not ask for it. Thank you for explaining about the SAR If I send this to the people taking us to court (which is in 2 weeks) how does this alter the court hearing, what do I need to say to the DJ?

 

I am objecting to the CO on several grounds

a) we are in negative equity

b) I thought I had made provision for the possible loss of earning with PPI Which i have paid out almost £2000 over 3 years

c) the debt is in my name and not my partners

d) We have 4 other creditors who we owe more too and they have accepted a token payment and frozen interest and charges

 

Do you think I have a case and how should I add this SAR to my list of objections?

Many thanks Clare

Link to post
Share on other sites

badger220987

 

Move the pointing arrow over the 'subject access request' words in your post above. The SAR Request would not help your case, it just means that you are requesting information , but you could say to the judge that you've requested statements from the creditor so you can claim mis-sold PPI charges back.

 

You really need to stick to one thread.

Edited by rebel11
Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to get a copy of the T&C for the PPI, it appears to me that this has been mis-sold due to the fact you were self employed and the policy probably is worthless regardless of what payments you were making.

This loan will be halved when the PPI PLUS interest has been refunded.

I have no legal training, any knowledge I have has come from this forum, and my own experiences. Always balance up any advice you get with your own common sense.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...